Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Stock block power limit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2013, 12:47 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
powered4B11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stock block power limit

Hey guys i know there are a lot of threads about this, but I was wondering if anyone had any new info on this. The standard for stock block and internals has been 400 torque. Is this mustang dyno numbers, or dyno jet numbers? Has anyone reached safe numbers over 400?
Old Apr 24, 2013, 06:24 PM
  #2  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Oh8EvoX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe its on a mustang dyno. I was on a conservative tune on stock block/stock internals at 463/373 @28psi

Originally Posted by powered4B11
Hey guys i know there are a lot of threads about this, but I was wondering if anyone had any new info on this. The standard for stock block and internals has been 400 torque. Is this mustang dyno numbers, or dyno jet numbers? Has anyone reached safe numbers over 400?
Old Apr 24, 2013, 06:44 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
powered4B11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Oh8EvoX
I believe its on a mustang dyno. I was on a conservative tune on stock block/stock internals at 463/373 @28psi
Thanks man, ya I made 351/381 at 24psi on a virtual dyno, i know it's not entirely accurate but I know it's not far from it. Just wasn't sure if it was 400 mustang numbers
Old Apr 26, 2013, 09:33 AM
  #4  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
lippy1306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mustang dynos typically read lower than a Dyno Jet correct?
Old Apr 26, 2013, 07:08 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
mshilto89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by lippy1306
Mustang dynos typically read lower than a Dyno Jet correct?
That is correct.
Old Apr 27, 2013, 05:18 AM
  #6  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Mr. Move's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Nj
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to be on the safe side i would go by 400 on a dynojet and about 360-370 on a mustang dyno.
Old Apr 27, 2013, 06:02 AM
  #7  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
evokid4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NorthWest,Indiana
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea i was gonna say around 380wtq on a mustang should be where you wanna be at
Old Apr 27, 2013, 07:25 AM
  #8  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Darksun280's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ny
Posts: 476
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mustangs can be adjusted to read higher and on the other hand Buschur's Dyno reads so low it's made grown men cry. So basically the line of reasoning in this thread is moot. Best to just check with your tuner what they think is safe

My 605 was on a mustang dyno at R/t tuning. Believe me though if I dyno'd at Buschur I wouldn't even come close to that number.

Last edited by Darksun280; Apr 27, 2013 at 07:33 AM.
Old Apr 28, 2013, 09:07 AM
  #9  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
powered4B11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I got my car on my tuners dyno yesterday, turns out virtual dyno numbers are pretty far off. My original street tune got me 303whp on the mustang dyno, where the virtual dyno said I made 351whp with 381tq. Got the car retuned and was able to crank out 322whp 321tq at 25psi.
Old Apr 28, 2013, 09:09 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
powered4B11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Typically mustang dynos read 10-13% less than dyno jets. But it all depends on the adjustments made
Old Apr 29, 2013, 06:17 AM
  #11  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
MisterHappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Converse, TX
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stock block right now, riding at 402awhp. I know guys in the 430s though.
Old Apr 29, 2013, 09:17 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
powered4B11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MisterHappy
Stock block right now, riding at 402awhp. I know guys in the 430s though.
Stock internals?
Old Apr 30, 2013, 12:13 AM
  #13  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
mirkendargen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by powered4B11
Stock internals?
Torque is what matters. You could have 430WHP and 320WTQ, or 430+WTQ. Just depends on the tune and setup. With a medium-large turbo, it's very possible to have 500+WHP with a stockish redline and stock block friendly torque levels.
Old Apr 30, 2013, 06:48 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
powered4B11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mirkendargen
Torque is what matters. You could have 430WHP and 320WTQ, or 430+WTQ. Just depends on the tune and setup. With a medium-large turbo, it's very possible to have 500+WHP with a stockish redline and stock block friendly torque levels.
Yup. I know torque is what kills. Just wanted to know which numbers are acceptable on stock block/stock internals. I will eventually swap out my stock turbo for a 6266 t3 set up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slvrevo84
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Jan 30, 2015 06:13 PM
PsychDr. HN$
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
89
Oct 22, 2014 09:21 AM
nzevo8
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
15
Sep 20, 2014 04:51 AM
loweyz
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
1
Aug 9, 2014 07:50 PM
JDM936
Evo X Dyno Results
6
Dec 12, 2013 07:38 PM



Quick Reply: Stock block power limit



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:11 PM.