Notices
04-06 Ralliart Engine/Drivetrain (no forced induction)

4G69 Information/Cross References

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2008, 01:43 PM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
PR_Mivec's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bryce89
So really all your saying is it i want to build my 4g69 all i would need a 4g69 spercific Cam shaft, crank and pistons. the rest i could use 4g63 stuff

Also just another question, take for example the honda boys using k24 block and a k20 head. would we be able to do the same? 4g69 block and a 4g63 head? using the 2.4L displacment and getting the legendary flowing capablity of a 4g63 head and 2 cams?


i retract from MY past opinios and state that yes you can put in a 4g63t head in on a 4g69 block and vice versa i saw this done on a mirage w/ "evo" engine (block read g69 on a g63 head
Old Jun 29, 2008, 05:01 PM
  #32  
Evolving Member
 
Cow town racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ even if it can be physically done you will have a hell of a time trying to tune for the dohc. I don't think you will be able to get the ecu to work.
Old Jun 29, 2008, 05:19 PM
  #33  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
PR_Mivec's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i know that is why this kind of mods NEED a stand alone ecu to work, the case in point had a TECIII, remember this was a mirage not a modern lancer
Old Jun 29, 2008, 07:05 PM
  #34  
Evolving Member
 
Cow town racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fair enough
Old Jun 29, 2008, 11:59 PM
  #35  
Newbie
 
Bryce89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course it would be done with a full stand alone ECU, Im not keen on piggybacks period.
Old Jul 21, 2008, 03:56 PM
  #36  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Realistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so sourcing parts are easily found from a 4g63? main/head studs and such? and the only custom items would be valve springs, and such?
Old Jul 22, 2008, 12:18 AM
  #37  
Newbie
 
Bryce89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Realistic
so sourcing parts are easily found from a 4g63? main/head studs and such? and the only custom items would be valve springs, and such?
You shouldnt need anything custom made, just about ever japanese tuning house has 4g63 stuff
Old Jul 22, 2008, 12:55 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
 
RalliDew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: naples,fl
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BUT THE VALVE TERRAIN ON THE 4G69 is one off for the 4g69 no other as of now.
Old Aug 6, 2008, 08:35 PM
  #39  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
LanEvo03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so will putting the Evo head (4g63) fit on the ralliart block (4g69)
Old Aug 7, 2008, 03:00 AM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
chowetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,033
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doing this major mod can really open up a whole new level of performance I mean your options would endless - but which head do you put on this engine my thoughts would be that you could really only put the Evo9 head - not sure could be wrong,

The other thing that you have to ask is do you go N/A and raise the compression to 10:5.1. or go boosted and swap over pistons lower compression etc or have a go at putting in the Evo Stroker kit ?

Either way you would ditch the Fly by wire setup put a return fuel line (all of which can be donated via a EVO!!)

As for the ecu - I wonder if you could ditch the factory ECU and adopt the evo 9 ecuu and then add a PB unit! I mean you are basiclly recreating a 4G63T engine but with a larger displacement.
Old Jan 21, 2009, 06:35 AM
  #41  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ralliart_on_LSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 2,699
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
this is an awesome thread. cant beleive it took me this long to find it. very helpful in my quest for 509whp. thanks.
Old Jan 31, 2009, 11:21 AM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ralliart_on_LSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 2,699
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So my rods cam in the mail. I'm going to post a picture now for you guys to see and compare our stock rods, and Eagle H-beam rods, for an EVO8 that fits our car perfectly. Some say we dont "need rods, and ours is already reinforced"

one look at this pictures tells a different story...





I'm going to post this up on a few other threads, just so it'll be helpful for others to search and find out info for our car.
Old Feb 1, 2009, 03:23 AM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
chowetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,033
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And now we can see how Mitsubishi saved 100+grams on each rod as a weight saver..

Thanks for posting very interesting to see them side by side - but damn talk about the banana effect...
Old Feb 2, 2009, 09:57 PM
  #44  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Realistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chowetime
And now we can see how Mitsubishi saved 100+grams on each rod as a weight saver..

Thanks for posting very interesting to see them side by side - but damn talk about the banana effect...
comments were too offtopic.

So as far as evo8/9 internals go... we won't be able to use evo pistons/mods?
but the head is fair game, as well as bolts/studs.. and springs?

Just curious what the advantage of using a 4g63 head, compared to a 4g69 head is.....
thanks again.

Last edited by Realistic; Feb 2, 2009 at 11:41 PM.
Old Feb 3, 2009, 01:53 AM
  #45  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
chowetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,033
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The advantage would be to be able to drop the compression and more available parts downside is that you lose CC


Quick Reply: 4G69 Information/Cross References



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 PM.