Notices

Exhaust Size. 2.25" or 2.5"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2006, 04:07 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
chowetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,033
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MITVRX
The shop recommends 2" exhaust, otherwise I'll lose alot of low end torque. They said "Do you want top end performance or driveability?"

Top end 2.25" - 2.5"
Driveability 2.0" - low-mid-high

Do you think I should go 2 or 2.25?

I won't go 2.5 or larger..
If your exhaust shop is say for you to go 2" then he has absolutely no idea at all is trying to rip you a new one... reason why is that I think you will find that as a stock one you already have a 2" pipe... I wonder if he realises that the car is a 2.4lt not a 2lt that he most likely sees a lot of...

If you are planning on staying N.A then you would be best off having a 21/2" press bent if you want to go all out on N.A then get it mandrel bent if you are wanting to go turbo then a either 3" press bent or mandrel bent depending then on how much hp and how much of a race car you want

As for mufflers I would deffinately go for the Lukey Ultra flow as it is a really nice sounding not tinny and crappy I have never used the Magna flow so I can't comment on that one
Old Nov 9, 2006, 07:18 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
MITVRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry for the 2" i was talking about the size of the muffler..
Old Nov 9, 2006, 02:19 PM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
chowetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,033
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well again you would be wanting to have the exhaust and the muffler the same size - as soon as you start down sizing you immediately cause a restriction so if your exhaust piping is 21/2" wide then you muffler should also be 21/2" wide and the muffler should also be of a internal design were it is almost straight thru - should have a very slight kink in it to help reduce noise level but still very good flow- straight thru will give good flow but noise level will increase this is why I went for the Lukey Ultra Flow
Old Nov 9, 2006, 03:14 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
MITVRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay I'll get a 2.5" piping with 2.5" muffler? But 2.5" muffler isn't that too big for a N/A car?
Old Nov 9, 2006, 03:26 PM
  #20  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (133)
 
MitsuJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 3,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep the muffler the same size as the pipe. I know you are smater than this! =P
Old Nov 9, 2006, 07:55 PM
  #21  
Evolved Member
 
egk-69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Halli Wood
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MITVRX
Okay I'll get a 2.5" piping with 2.5" muffler? But 2.5" muffler isn't that too big for a N/A car?
naaaahhh...
what makes you think thaT?
Old Nov 10, 2006, 12:09 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
 
stEVOx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mitvrx, im looking for exhaust aswell. im going to go 2.5" from the cat back - as i plan doing a turbo job in the future - , but dont know what muffler to get (magnaflow or lukey): lol maybe we should go one brand each and compare, lol ...

anyways keep us informed on where u get it done and price please
(btw what state u in?)
Old Nov 10, 2006, 06:46 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
MITVRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im in Sydney.

Yep I'll notify you. If I get lukey or magnaflow, it will be both the same brand, don't want to mix brands really.

I'll get 2.5". Take it from there.
Old Nov 12, 2006, 06:51 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
MITVRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So today I went to the exhaust shop and they said to stick with the stock piping and just change the muffler only. He said the stock will keep the low end - mid end and driveability on the car would be at its best if I stuck with the stock exhaust piping.

He said 2.25" and even 2.5" was too big for the car. He said it would not be worth it as alot of low end power will be lost and the top end power will be very very minimal. On the other hand he said that it would be much better to just change the muffler to free up some hp. (btw this guy is very respectable in Sydney). He said "You know, if you want 2.5, I can do it no problem, but I'm telling you now, if I do it for you, you'll be wasting your money *shows hand gesture of ripping up money*) He said most exhaust shops just want money but I don't care about that, I care about whats best for the customer. Then he went on to say that if you want it, I can do it but I'm telling you your wasting your money.

For some reason, when he was testing the magnaflow exhausts/ xforce etc... the sound was very raspy (wet fart in a tin shed - lol) and it was not good at all. He said its possible the extractors could be causing the raspy sound..

We tried twin loop xforces, canon magnaflows and always raspy..

help???
Old Nov 12, 2006, 06:55 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8kor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 564
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
personally i don't think 2.25 or 2.5 inch will give you that much difference compared to the stock exhaust, i went w/ the 3 inch. plus it's louder
Old Nov 12, 2006, 06:56 PM
  #26  
Newbie
 
DSMSSQUASHEVOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Westfield, Indiana
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you only need a 2.5
Old Nov 12, 2006, 07:48 PM
  #27  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
xhotaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: home
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
go 2.5
Old Nov 12, 2006, 07:58 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
MITVRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by str8kor
personally i don't think 2.25 or 2.5 inch will give you that much difference compared to the stock exhaust, i went w/ the 3 inch. plus it's louder
Thats true, and yeah, it would be much much louder. Then again, you drive an Evo, so I guess 3" is recommended for turbos.

Okay, lets say I go 2.5, now tell me why? I mean, the extractors are 44mm, so should the piping be consistent? Or is it okay to change from 44 mm to a 2 1/4" pipe?
Old Nov 12, 2006, 09:58 PM
  #29  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
ROCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by xhotaru
go 2.5

NO. Go 2.5 and go slow. We tried it and compared it. 2.25 was better.

ROAD/RACE
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:50 AM
  #30  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (133)
 
MitsuJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 3,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go 2.5 and lose bottom end. I felt no difference with my pressbent 2.5" (which necks down) vs my 2.5" mandrel in the top end. The bottom end was about the same. If anything the mandrel was better in my case only because it did not leak and has a bit more back pressure when compared to what I was running on my 2.5" pressbent system which was an Ebay special muffler.


Quick Reply: Exhaust Size. 2.25" or 2.5"?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 PM.