Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

A Lancer that doesn't suck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 06:04 AM
  #1  
thun712's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Savannah, GA
Cool A Lancer that doesn't suck

Title was quoted from September's issue of Super Street. They have an article about the new Ralliart on there. Not exactly a review per se, but one of their "first drive" articles. The verdict ended up being "impressed." They said that it was definitely not an Evo and to just step up for the Evo expereince. Bolting on Evo X parts was also mentioned to just be a waste of money. Instead, the Ralliart was a "stepped up GTS" (quotes not exact I've left the mag at home)

They were happy with the shifting and the prospect of power came from the parts that ARE Evo-similar, specially the transmission. In lasts months article an Evo X trany was tested with increased power and it held on pretty good so they sorta expect the Ralliart trany to take the same kind of tuning. Because of this they are seriously thinking that the Ralliart could become a good tuner car since it is priced right below the Evo and has a different competition.

No mention of price other than expect it "right below 30K." There was a photoshoot of I wanna say some new pics but all of the same orange Ralliart we've all seen. The article's tagline was essentially Mitsubishi finally putting out a Lancer that doesnt suck. Definately a worthy read, so go check it.

I'll post more details when I grab the mag back at home again.
This is starting to look good!




Thun
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #2  
hibby's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by thun712
Title was quoted from September's issue of Super Street. They have an article about the new Ralliart on there. Not exactly a review per se, but one of their "first drive" articles. The verdict ended up being "impressed." They said that it was definitely not an Evo and to just step up for the Evo expereince. Bolting on Evo X parts was also mentioned to just be a waste of money. Instead, the Ralliart was a "stepped up GTS" (quotes not exact I've left the mag at home)

They were happy with the shifting and the prospect of power came from the parts that ARE Evo-similar, specially the transmission. In lasts months article an Evo X trany was tested with increased power and it held on pretty good so they sorta expect the Ralliart trany to take the same kind of tuning. Because of this they are seriously thinking that the Ralliart could become a good tuner car since it is priced right below the Evo and has a different competition.

No mention of price other than expect it "right below 30K." There was a photoshoot of I wanna say some new pics but all of the same orange Ralliart we've all seen. The article's tagline was essentially Mitsubishi finally putting out a Lancer that doesnt suck. Definately a worthy read, so go check it.

I'll post more details when I grab the mag back at home again.
This is starting to look good!




Thun
Scan it!!! (Please.)
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:39 AM
  #3  
16vTAWD's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
09' Lancer Ralliart=awd+turbo
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=127586
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #4  
VincentX's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Super Street sucks.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #5  
thun712's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Savannah, GA
Originally Posted by VincentX
Super Street sucks.
I appreciate your insight, but I don't think it has anything to do with what I'm trying to express! The car is getting publicity and a lot of reviewer (regardless of skill) are giving it thumbs up! That's what matters! You may not like it but there are people that are interested in the magazines and what their editors have to say. They got one thing going for them: They've stay popular, and that stands for something. Not defending the company, I'm defending the Ralliart's publicity

Won't scanning it be some sort of copyright scam thingy? Doesn't that even violate board rules? If not I can scan it later. I like the fact that almost everyone that looks at the car likes it (reviewers that is) It means more popularity which can increase aftermarket support, though it has its negatives too... double edge.

I do agree that people coming into the Rally with a "little evo" attitude will be disappointed. Those looking for a good car on its own are the ones that will enjoy it. Thanks for the linkie 16vTAWD

Thun

Last edited by thun712; Jul 24, 2008 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Stuff
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #6  
desperado-c's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Low Profile, TX
Originally Posted by thun712
I appreciate your insight, ....

Won't scanning it be some sort of copyright scam thingy? Doesn't that even violate board rules? If not I can scan it later. ....
Thun
Definitely a copyright violation but haven't heard of any mags pursuing it. You could be the very first!
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 12:14 PM
  #7  
VincentX's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by thun712
I appreciate your insight, but I don't think it has anything to do with what I'm trying to express! The car is getting publicity and a lot of reviewer (regardless of skill) are giving it thumbs up! That's what matters! You may not like it but there are people that are interested in the magazines and what their editors have to say. They got one thing going for them: They've stay popular, and that stands for something. Not defending the company, I'm defending the Ralliart's publicity

Won't scanning it be some sort of copyright scam thingy? Doesn't that even violate board rules? If not I can scan it later. I like the fact that almost everyone that looks at the car likes it (reviewers that is) It means more popularity which can increase aftermarket support, though it has its negatives too... double edge.

I do agree that people coming into the Rally with a "little evo" attitude will be disappointed. Those looking for a good car on its own are the ones that will enjoy it. Thanks for the linkie 16vTAWD

Thun
I understand what you are saying. I'm just saying Stupid Streets sucks. I used to read it all the time. After a while I got sick of it's riceness, JDM snobbery, and gross import models.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #8  
ralliarting's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
i think this is the magazine article:
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/fe...art/index.html
doesn't really tell us anything we don't know, but worth the read, at least time to kill meanwhile mitsu gives some further details of release date ! Even subaru is creating more news with there new 2009 versions.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 02:36 PM
  #9  
ExcessLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: ATLANTA
Originally Posted by thun712
No mention of price other than expect it "right below 30K."
Yeh and that is the problem.... the price as usual is too high... especially for a car with a reputation of sucking... MITSU can charge premium untill the lancer name earns back some respect.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #10  
hibby's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by ralliarting
i think this is the magazine article:
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/fe...art/index.html
doesn't really tell us anything we don't know, but worth the read, at least time to kill meanwhile mitsu gives some further details of release date ! Even subaru is creating more news with there new 2009 versions.
Thank you, but that one is from Sport Compact Car...the new one is from Super Street. I already scanned the SCC article and posted it...find it here...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...9&postcount=35
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #11  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
Originally Posted by desperado-c
Definitely a copyright violation but haven't heard of any mags pursuing it. You could be the very first!
Mags can and do persue it, including on this site. In the past we've been approached by a few major magazines (such as Motor Trend) requesting that we delete posts with scans.

Do not scan and post magazine articles. Just find it online and link to it.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #12  
aestival's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Originally Posted by otter
Mags can and do persue it, including on this site. In the past we've been approached by a few major magazines (such as Motor Trend) requesting that we delete posts with scans.

Do not scan and post magazine articles. Just find it online and link to it.
Like, for instance, this Sport Compact Car article that's been on the web for a week or so:

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/fe...art/index.html

[not that the scan linked to above wasn't nice for those of us who can't get the magazine locally]
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #13  
desperado-c's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Low Profile, TX
Originally Posted by otter
Mags can and do persue it, including on this site. In the past we've been approached by a few major magazines (such as Motor Trend) requesting that we delete posts with scans.

Do not scan and post magazine articles. Just find it online and link to it.
Point taken, if you don't want to cause problems for the forum, don't scan and post.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #14  
hibby's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: PA
Copyright enforcement is a total bummer.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #15  
downshift411's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: MA
lancer is no where near the evo x. then again mitsu is notorious makin the same chasis, body with different engine transplant for certain models. now the new lancer and the ten....to me the only difference is well everything...but its so wrong to think of it that way. mitsu gets a big thumbs down. wasting their money, wasting your time. with that money i'd rather get a real evo or put money down for one. AT LEAST ITS ABOUT TIME THEY BRING BACK "LANCER GSR'S" WELL SORTA.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:01 AM.