RalliArt Test Drive (Merge)
so none of those reasons are good enough to justify paying the same price for a car with less equipment
nobody's fighting over anything. just saying that the Ralliart is a screw up right out the gate. it's too slow, and too expensive. while we are on the subject, accord coupes and altima's are faster, better looking, better equipped, infinately better service, and warranty coverage, and can be had for likely the same money, or less than a ralliart, and will likely be better on insurance, and for sure a hell of a lot better on gas. that's just sad.
i dunno where you got those numbers from, but V6 accords have been low to mid 14 second cars for a while now, and the V6 6speed coupe has been known to break 13's (rare, but possible) stock. 0-60 5.9 1/4 mile in 14.5 as tested by road and track, autospies pulled a 14.6 with one, and i saw a guy on a honda forum that did 14.2.
altima V6 has been tested to do 0-60 in 5.7 1/4 mile in 14.2 tested by road and track, and the camry can also go 0-60 in 5.7 seconds. what's sad is these cars can not only toast the ralliart, but can almost keep up with the EVO in a str8 line. from a roll, they might win...that's sad.
altima V6 has been tested to do 0-60 in 5.7 1/4 mile in 14.2 tested by road and track, and the camry can also go 0-60 in 5.7 seconds. what's sad is these cars can not only toast the ralliart, but can almost keep up with the EVO in a str8 line. from a roll, they might win...that's sad.
You are wrong.
2008 Honda Accord Coupe (V6) 0-60mph in 5.9 sec
2008 Toyota Camry XLE 0-60mph in 6.1 sec
2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 0-60mph 5.9 sec
I just do not really see anything special about a $30,000 car with these numbers (Ralliart) I think that for once a car should include all the goodies for a flat rate. This isn't selfish considering many used to. If this car had a price tag of say $27,000 new and came with HID's AND Recaros then I would be all over it. However it does not offer that.
2008 EVO X GSR MSRP: $31883 (basic model, however still includes the recaros and xenons because it's an EVO)
2009 Ralliart w/ Recaros/HID's is just a hair below $30,000
2008 Honda Accord Coupe (V6) 0-60mph in 5.9 sec
2008 Toyota Camry XLE 0-60mph in 6.1 sec
2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 0-60mph 5.9 sec
I just do not really see anything special about a $30,000 car with these numbers (Ralliart) I think that for once a car should include all the goodies for a flat rate. This isn't selfish considering many used to. If this car had a price tag of say $27,000 new and came with HID's AND Recaros then I would be all over it. However it does not offer that.
2008 EVO X GSR MSRP: $31883 (basic model, however still includes the recaros and xenons because it's an EVO)
2009 Ralliart w/ Recaros/HID's is just a hair below $30,000
You are wrong.
2008 Honda Accord Coupe (V6) 0-60mph in 5.9 sec
2008 Toyota Camry XLE 0-60mph in 6.1 sec
2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 0-60mph 5.9 sec
I just do not really see anything special about a $30,000 car with these numbers (Ralliart) I think that for once a car should include all the goodies for a flat rate. This isn't selfish considering many used to. If this car had a price tag of say $27,000 new and came with HID's AND Recaros then I would be all over it. However it does not offer that.
2008 EVO X GSR MSRP: $31883 (basic model, however still includes the recaros and xenons because it's an EVO)
2009 Ralliart w/ Recaros/HID's is just a hair below $30,000
2008 Honda Accord Coupe (V6) 0-60mph in 5.9 sec
2008 Toyota Camry XLE 0-60mph in 6.1 sec
2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 0-60mph 5.9 sec
I just do not really see anything special about a $30,000 car with these numbers (Ralliart) I think that for once a car should include all the goodies for a flat rate. This isn't selfish considering many used to. If this car had a price tag of say $27,000 new and came with HID's AND Recaros then I would be all over it. However it does not offer that.
2008 EVO X GSR MSRP: $31883 (basic model, however still includes the recaros and xenons because it's an EVO)
2009 Ralliart w/ Recaros/HID's is just a hair below $30,000
The bottom line is. If this Ralliart was starting at $23,000 ish with what it has to offer, it would all be a different story. Kind of like the WRX TR, but no... companies want to scrape up as much damn money as they possibly can on a car they already cut corners on. This Ralliart... not only does it NOT come with Recaros or HIDs at this $27,000 price tag it doesn't even come with decent rubber. Hell the 2004-2005 Dodge SRT-4 came with BFG G/Force TA KDW's, Viper seats and a stock Quaife LSD... and was faster than this car and for almost $8,000 LESS if the Ralliart had ZERO options.
Insurance: You are buying a brand new car, if you are that concerned with saving the fraction of green you will be saving with a Ralliart over an EVO you need to look at how much you are throwing out the window buying a new car. You can take that depreciation hit and pay for insurance 3 years in advance.
Parts:A clutch will cost you the same to fix or repair, evo or ralliart. The twin clutch transmission is too, the same. Brake components may be a bit more expensive but unless you are a retard that does whatever the dealer tells you to do, it will be close to the same. I bet the other 80% of the parts are inter-changeable from there on out.
The point is:
Acceptable: Ralliart starting at $23,000 w/out Recaros/HID's or add the options for a total of $25,000 ish with better rubber
Unacceptable: Ralliart starting at $27,000 w/out Recaros/HID's and add the options for a total of $29,000 ish price as tested with better rubber. Too much for too little
Then you travel, you are less of an idiot traveling for the right deal then you are confining yourself to one small area on a map and saying "Damn, these things are just out of my range".
The bottom line is. If this Ralliart was starting at $23,000 ish with what it has to offer, it would all be a different story. Kind of like the WRX TR, but no... companies want to scrape up as much damn money as they possibly can on a car they already cut corners on. This Ralliart... not only does it NOT come with Recaros or HIDs at this $27,000 price tag it doesn't even come with decent rubber. Hell the 2004-2005 Dodge SRT-4 came with BFG G/Force TA KDW's, Viper seats and a stock Quaife LSD... and was faster than this car and for almost $8,000 LESS if the Ralliart had ZERO options.
Insurance: You are buying a brand new car, if you are that concerned with saving the fraction of green you will be saving with a Ralliart over an EVO you need to look at how much you are throwing out the window buying a new car. You can take that depreciation hit and pay for insurance 3 years in advance.
Parts:A clutch will cost you the same to fix or repair, evo or ralliart. The twin clutch transmission is too, the same. Brake components may be a bit more expensive but unless you are a retard that does whatever the dealer tells you to do, it will be close to the same. I bet the other 80% of the parts are inter-changeable from there on out.
The point is:
Acceptable: Ralliart starting at $23,000 w/out Recaros/HID's or add the options for a total of $25,000 ish with better rubber
Unacceptable: Ralliart starting at $27,000 w/out Recaros/HID's and add the options for a total of $29,000 ish price as tested with better rubber. Too much for too little
The bottom line is. If this Ralliart was starting at $23,000 ish with what it has to offer, it would all be a different story. Kind of like the WRX TR, but no... companies want to scrape up as much damn money as they possibly can on a car they already cut corners on. This Ralliart... not only does it NOT come with Recaros or HIDs at this $27,000 price tag it doesn't even come with decent rubber. Hell the 2004-2005 Dodge SRT-4 came with BFG G/Force TA KDW's, Viper seats and a stock Quaife LSD... and was faster than this car and for almost $8,000 LESS if the Ralliart had ZERO options.
Insurance: You are buying a brand new car, if you are that concerned with saving the fraction of green you will be saving with a Ralliart over an EVO you need to look at how much you are throwing out the window buying a new car. You can take that depreciation hit and pay for insurance 3 years in advance.
Parts:A clutch will cost you the same to fix or repair, evo or ralliart. The twin clutch transmission is too, the same. Brake components may be a bit more expensive but unless you are a retard that does whatever the dealer tells you to do, it will be close to the same. I bet the other 80% of the parts are inter-changeable from there on out.
The point is:
Acceptable: Ralliart starting at $23,000 w/out Recaros/HID's or add the options for a total of $25,000 ish with better rubber
Unacceptable: Ralliart starting at $27,000 w/out Recaros/HID's and add the options for a total of $29,000 ish price as tested with better rubber. Too much for too little
I won't argue about your logic here, this is your opinion and that's fair. The only other point I have to make it that the cheapest base V6 accord coupe starts @ $29500, and the cheapest V6 altima coupe base is $27k. We're also comparing a bunch of FWD cars to a car with the same AWD system as the EVO IX, to me that's a critical difference.
I won't argue about your logic here, this is your opinion and that's fair. The only other point I have to make it that the cheapest base V6 accord coupe starts @ $29500, and the cheapest V6 altima coupe base is $27k. We're also comparing a bunch of FWD cars to a car with the same AWD system as the EVO IX, to me that's a critical difference.
The Accord/Camry/Altima argument is not there to compare the cars in terms of pricing and what they offer. It is to bring up that a "Rally inspired all wheel drive turbo charged" sport compact can get tooled on by an ignorant soccer mom trying to merge lanes on the wrong side. It doesn't matter how much the Accord/Altima/Camry costs, it is the principle of being practically outperformed by what is known to be some of the most economical, boring, bland cars on the road when you are driving this alleged canyon carving turbo charged 4 banger.
Sarcasm -- look it up -- the 2009 Lancer Ralliart is a V4, the other cars aren't (at least not in their power versions), and they also don't have AWD or dual clutches. You see, I knew these things and the last part of the sentence was a dead giveaway that I was being sarcastic. Good god, I shouldn't have to explain any of this... do you even know what the 2009 Lancer Ralliart is?
I'm completely ready for it. It's going to be on hell of a package.
And you are complaining about the price but I bet you can't find a single other car in that range with those features for that price.
Like OMFG wow $1700 for the upgrade package? Guess what bud price those parts out individually and see what you come up with. It would be closer to 4 or 5000.
People seem to obsessed with the stupid magazine numbers, guess what they dont mean ****. The people testing ms3's said it did like 15.1 and we were doing 13.7's stock.
Wait for it to become a reality before ragging on it.
And you are complaining about the price but I bet you can't find a single other car in that range with those features for that price.
Like OMFG wow $1700 for the upgrade package? Guess what bud price those parts out individually and see what you come up with. It would be closer to 4 or 5000.
People seem to obsessed with the stupid magazine numbers, guess what they dont mean ****. The people testing ms3's said it did like 15.1 and we were doing 13.7's stock.
Wait for it to become a reality before ragging on it.
The same AWD system as the EVO IX yet a 0.81g on the skid? Hmm
The Accord/Camry/Altima argument is not there to compare the cars in terms of pricing and what they offer. It is to bring up that a "Rally inspired all wheel drive turbo charged" sport compact can get tooled on by an ignorant soccer mom trying to merge lanes on the wrong side. It doesn't matter how much the Accord/Altima/Camry costs, it is the principle of being practically outperformed by what is known to be some of the most economical, boring, bland cars on the road when you are driving this alleged canyon carving turbo charged 4 banger.
The Accord/Camry/Altima argument is not there to compare the cars in terms of pricing and what they offer. It is to bring up that a "Rally inspired all wheel drive turbo charged" sport compact can get tooled on by an ignorant soccer mom trying to merge lanes on the wrong side. It doesn't matter how much the Accord/Altima/Camry costs, it is the principle of being practically outperformed by what is known to be some of the most economical, boring, bland cars on the road when you are driving this alleged canyon carving turbo charged 4 banger.
EDMUNDS needs new drivers because those numbers are slow as ****. that doesn't mean the cars are slow, it means the people driving them don't know what they are doing.
I don't want to spend over $30K, I don't want a FWD, I don't want a coupe, I don't want Recaros, and I don't want a clutch pedal...sign me up for the RA, bishes....
With NO CLUTCH DROP LAUNCHES, the acceleration numbers are pretty impressive for how much it weighs. Handling figures are easy fixes, as I will not keep the car sitting on top of the world as it were and the wheels and tires are coming off within the first week. All the h8rs go sit on a fat
With NO CLUTCH DROP LAUNCHES, the acceleration numbers are pretty impressive for how much it weighs. Handling figures are easy fixes, as I will not keep the car sitting on top of the world as it were and the wheels and tires are coming off within the first week. All the h8rs go sit on a fat



