awesome..
the numbers look lower than ttp's baseline dyno

 

^^^That's the first thing I noticed... Reasoning behind that? Besides the fact that everycar is different...

 

Different dynos, different readings. Perfectly normal, as I understand it.

If you overlay TTP's chart with AMS's, the curves look about the same -- it's only the numbers that differ. I realize they don't match up exactly, but cars vary as well, and I didn't take too much time trying to align the graphs either.

EDIT: What I don't see on AMS' graph, however, and perhaps it's a smoothing setting or something, is the hp/tq spike @ 3700 rpm.

 

That spike occurred for TTP when the tranny started to shut down due to too much torque. I see the spike at 3400 though, so not sure if we are talking the same thing.

 

This is correct.

Interestingly enough, we did not hit torque protection limits today while tuning another RA.

 

WOW, so what does that mean in your opinion?!!

 

what kind of things are you planning to do? I might send my car up.

 

Any news guys?

Any luck with an intake?

 

Yeah, what happened to the add a part and check the gains?

 

hey those parts you guys made for the RA intercooler, are they for sale yet? and is the fmic the evo X fmic in your site?

 

Also if i want your intake do i have to get the smaller battery kit?