Wow long drive...Sounds like a fun trip

 

that is right, but all people drives them so some gain maybe looks awesome on the dyno , not so much on the street....
but the track numbers will be always true on the street ...

 

Dyno's measure the exact whp gains with precision which is why it costs $80,000-150,000 for one.

Please take your trolling posts elsewhere.

 

this dyno vs dyno is over talked many times, so a general agreement is a dyno good for measur the gains for the modification you did.
And many times happens, some one with the lower dyno numbers are actually faster on the real life then the higher ones.
That is why i said, for the newbies the Dyno numbers not salt and grain.
The dyno is a tool to measure the gain from your base number. On that particular dyno, thats all.

Prove me wrong on this.

 

Our dyno supports quarter mile drag racing and is dead accurate on the E.T. and MPH as it would run on the street.

 

it sounds like there's some crazy lag off the line. but from 40-70 that boost is really crankin'. sounds mean too!

a metering device would probably put it at 5.5 seconds to 60, pretty much in line with what reviewers are getting using torque brake method. which is pretty awesome. you don't have to break your tranny or eff up your brakes if you use a chip! but it sounds like you'll have to live with the CELs.

I can't wait for my sportback!

 

Is TTP still working on the Z-chip to get rid of the CELs or is that the final product?

 

We should be able to keep the overboost code off for in person zchip tuning at our facility but we cannot guarantee just yet that mail away zchips won't get it.

If you flip the key to off and back on real quick, it resets the idle and if you do it 4 x it resets the code.

It is not limited to the Ralliarts as the rest of the Evo X family gets the code as well.

Even with other tuning methods the overboost code can come on periodically. We are working with the ECU code to try and find a way to disable the code altogether, but in the meantime its a temporary nuissance.

 

I dropped IDriveRA's video into editing software for finer control of timing on the 0-60 run. I came up with 5.46 seconds, give or take.

 

This is assuming that the capture and upload rate remained the same as the actual event.

 

New graphs and numbers info added to this post!

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/6528931-post2.html

 

Best I can do with what I have. Anybody is welcome to find a more accurate method.

 

Can someone time or get a vid of their stock RA from 0-60? please.

 

it think the RA is more interesting from 30 mph. when you dont need a launch.

 

I think the RA is fairly quick from about 10 MPH to about 70 MPH. After that it starts to run out of steam (boost). It hesistates slightly at takeoff but as soon as you can get to 3k RPM it will take off pretty nicely.