Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Confused.

Old Jul 3, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #1  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
Confused.

Ok im comparing AMS dyno's here with what the RA can make with bolt-ons.
One dyno says 259hp and 246tq

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/6577946-post17.html

and then the other says 266hp and 303tq

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7005867-post1.html


these are just with bolt-ons, but yet one dyno has 40 more tq?

I am a little confused. maybe someone can clear this up.

Last edited by GiLizILL; Jul 3, 2009 at 09:59 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 10:59 AM
  #2  
C H's Avatar
C H
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, MB
Looks like the second dyno is 305 HP and the 266 HP was the baseline before the EVO X turbo.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 11:09 AM
  #3  
DatRAzn's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 7
From: Michigan
In the second dyno, Chris is showing the RA numbers with the X turbo installed. And for comparasion, he put on a MR's chart with similar bolt-ons. So the 266hp/303tq grah is the RA, and the other is the MR.

The first dyno graph was before the X turbo was installed i believe. Look at the dates, first graph was from JAN. second one is from APR.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 02:54 PM
  #4  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
but if you read the post about the ra evox turbo, it says its comparing it between stock turbo and then an evo x turbo
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:54 PM.