Ok so I got the car Dyno'ed today! Ya finally. All I can say is wow my estimates are off! I only had 98 WHP when we started we got it up to 109 whp with the Emanage Ultimate. However on the good side I do have 126 Torque when all was said and done! We found the intake flow matches the exhaust flow well. He said it was one of the best he had seen. In all the gains where good, but way to expensive to yield this little! So what does our car ship with for WHP? I tried searching the registry but that part of the site is down. Oh well. I still like it! and it was fun getting here. but I am a bit sad at the low numbers with all the money I spent.

All pulls where in 4th gear on a Dynapack dyno.

 

i've heard everyone say 120 ponies is what we start with stock at the engine. looks like we really lose a bit from the crank to the wheels, eh?

i'm STILL in tears, haha.

 

it is 120 to the fly!

 

Heres a list of dynoed lancers

 

Holy crap, so the complete list of mods that add power are this?:
Intake, throttle body, intake manifold, port and polish head, header, exhaust, lightweight pulley, cam gear and shaft, and emanage.
and that entire list together created 109 whp and 126 tq? That is unbelievable (in a bad way). It makes me really wish I hadn't spent money on anything and just started saving for a turbo. Good to see you got it dynoed.

 

it is pretty pathetic. Thats why the only mods i'm doing are to support my 300hp turbo plan.

 

Ok Adam, put the car on a Mustang Dyno so that it will read some different numbers and make everybody happy. Most people forget that not all dynos are created equal.

 

Haha, 109 hp. Only mods I will do are interior and exterior, exhaust will be considered part of the look as well, I might go turbo when I get bored.

 

it looks like your list of mods is almost exactly the same as mine, minus the emanage. i plan on going full standalone.
nice choice on the JIC's btw. those are always overlooked. but not many people actually know about them, lol. but why drop $1600 on those just for the camber plate when you could have just picked up a cusco or tein one for around $300? unless the teins were dead and in need of replacing?

 

I needed the adjustable stuff... thats why JIC

 

Hard to say for sure. Every dyno is different, so getting a solid number is really impossible.

Buschur Racing dynoed a stock Lancer at 103 whp on a DynoJet dyno back in '01.
I know that a good rough estimate for a stock Lancer on a Mustang dyno would be about 88 whp.

Really, there's no way to know.

 

ok cool thanks for the info. I know there are differences in dynos. Perhaps if I where on a mustang dyno the numbers would be much higher. I have been told this that the dynapack dynos read low, (actually they read the most accurate, but not a discussion for here) also I have been told that others are doing pulls in 3rd this will make it read about 5-8% higher. (drive ratios and such) The guy who did the dyno for me is a really respected dyno tuner in the MA area He told me to ask if people are reporting there ASE interpreted number or actual number. (ASE interprets the number with Barometric pressure and outside temp, this will lead to much higher readings) Thanks for all the input. I have to say he and I talk at great length about doing standalone Vs. PB and we went this way because I need to put the key in the car and make it go in the morning. Also in MA they read off you OBD2 to do emissions. The obd2 does nto work with MA standards under standalone system. This car is my daily driver with just shy of 100K on it...

 

I doubt you'd get more out of a Mustang. They have the same "read low, very accurate" reputation.

If you ran the car on a DynoJet, however, you'd probably see some much higher numbers...

 

Cool man thanks again for the info.... its all about learning as much as I can right now

 

10k you mean?