Notices
Automotosports - Illinois Automotosports is a Chicago based tuner specializing in 4G63T performance. With an in-house fabrication facility and engineers on staff, they will be bringing you the best in Lancer Evolution parts.

Rod Bolts stretching

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 10:13 PM
  #1  
tony gibson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Rod Bolts stretching

So I have heard a few stories about rod bolts stretching and the holes elongating I have 34,000 miles on the odometer and am about to step up to a 3065 turbo and AEM...I am wondering how far I should push the car for track days. The car is setup for this turbo but I am just wondering how long the stock bottom end will hold running 28-30psi only on track days....I have an excellent tuner who will be handling business and he is confident the car will do fine. He is also going to teach me the ropes on the AEM so I can navigate through the software myself( I already have decent tuning knowledge) My daily driving tune will be unagressive...18-20psi. I refuse to get meth injection because I know my right foot will get heavy and the car will get beat on more than if I just stick to pump gas and low boost on the street. Martin, Eric, any info appreciated...thanks


-Tony
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 10:47 PM
  #2  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
I've been running on the 3065 and DSMLink on my Eclipse at ~27psi w/ DIY meth, for almost 3 years now *in sig*. Stock bottom end (none of which is forged -unlike the Evo), with only headstuds/272's/and MLS gasket. With the proper tune the bottom end can hold upwards of 500whp.

for an idea i've been running my setup that has trapped numorous 127-129mph traps. You'll be fine . Keep an eye on the a/f and keep timing reasonable, generally timing is what kills motors given other things are within reason.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #3  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
we hear customers ask us this alot but in all the builds we have done we have never once come across an EVO that has had the stock rod bolts stretch. Is it a bad idea? of course not. I dont think its necessary. By the time your stock rod bolts are stretching your stock rods and pistons are probally taking a beating too.


One thing Martin brought up to me today. Rod bolts really are directly related to RPM. Under compression the striain isnt on the rod bolt but on the piston and rod creating pressure on the crank and rod bearings. Its under the Exhuast stroke where the rod and piston pull against the rod bolt that you will have the strain on the rod bolt. If all you are keeping the cars RPM range within the factory limits (maybe a few hundred rpm higher) you really have nothing to worry about with rod bolts. Save your money for something more important.

Eric

Last edited by AutoMotoSports; Jul 14, 2006 at 07:42 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 07:58 AM
  #4  
puckadog's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Derwood, MD
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
we hear customers ask us this alot but in all the builds we have done we have never once come across an EVO that has had the stock rod bolts stretch. Is it a bad idea? of course not. I dont think its necessary. By the time your stock rod bolts are stretching your stock rods and pistons are probally taking a beating too.


One thing Martin brought up to me today. Rod bolts really are directly related to RPM. Under compression the striain isnt on the rod bolt but on the piston and rod creating pressure on the crank and rod bearings. Its under the Exhuast stroke where the rod and piston pull against the rod bolt that you will have the strain on the rod bolt. If all you are keeping the cars RPM range within the factory limits (maybe a few hundred rpm higher) you really have nothing to worry about with rod bolts. Save your money for something more important.

Eric
Thanks for your observations. info like that is good to have access to - thanks AMS
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 08:13 AM
  #5  
tony gibson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Thanks guys. That makes me feel alot better. As stated before, it will be tuned to make power but we are not trying to break records so it will be tuned on the safe side. The rpm thing makes since and I will not be taking the car past 8200-8500 because of the stock valve train (except 272 HKS) AND bottom end of course.
My goal is a 130 trap and a high 10 second pass on this set up.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 08:35 AM
  #6  
Drifto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 809
Likes: 2
From: Alabaster, AL
To me 8500rpm would be testing the stock hardwares' limits. I wouldn't suggest more 7900 on stock stuff maybe less.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #7  
tony gibson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
My buddy Mark Streeter has an AMS 35r with stock internals and AEM with the same guy tuning his that will tune mine and he goes to 8500. I think as long as your cams are not too agressive you are ok to 8500. He has about 55-60000 miles on the motor and 35-40000 of that is with the 35r.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #8  
IE Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: North Mexico (Inland Empire)
Originally Posted by tony gibson
My buddy Mark Streeter has an AMS 35r with stock internals and AEM with the same guy tuning his that will tune mine and he goes to 8500. I think as long as your cams are not too agressive you are ok to 8500. He has about 55-60000 miles on the motor and 35-40000 of that is with the 35r.
In that case why ask the question if Rod Bolts are needed. Your buddies car answered your question or u thinkin he got a freak beast of a motor or he does not track the car. Just wierd how your last statement of optimism and knowledge contradicts your initial post.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #9  
tony gibson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
And here you answered your own question so "why ask a question like that" lol? See what I mean? Yes I thought he may be getting lucky and have suggested he back it off a tad but thanks for playing bud lol. Besides, I always thought the bottoms were good to 8500 it was just the valve spings, retainers and what not were not good to 8500 if you had anything more aggressive than hks 272 cams. I could be wrong on this, I just want the opinions of people I think are professionls i.e Martin and Eric. Don't need a bash session here just helpful input
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2006 | 05:20 AM
  #10  
Ang Wen Yan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: KL,Malaysia
Originally Posted by Drifto
To me 8500rpm would be testing the stock hardwares' limits. I wouldn't suggest more 7900 on stock stuff maybe less.
Stock is proven to rev to 8.8k with 280 cam!!TTP,Trinababe,EVODave spin the stock motor(Head stud and cam only) with no probelm.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #11  
tony gibson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Thats what I was thinking...very mixed opnions on this subject from what I gather.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tscompusa
Project Cars / Build Threads
138
May 5, 2015 08:30 PM
craigybaby37
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Feb 20, 2012 04:52 PM
tony gibson
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
59
Jun 16, 2010 02:34 PM
arpad
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
12
Feb 15, 2009 11:55 PM
ecuflasher
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
9
Jan 28, 2008 08:45 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:26 PM.