Bosch 044, Aeromotive Stealth 340, Deatschwerks DW300, Walbro 255lph Fuel Pump Test
#19
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
maybe it's not recommended by walbro but people have been doing it forever. I'd also like to see a twin walbro kit in the comparison since it's the most popular 500+awhp solution
#24
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...pump-test.html
The plot showing the flow rates is missing, but updated plots are listed later in the thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ml#post4345625
#25
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't even know that Full blown made a 340lph pump.. Anyone want to send me one to test?
As for the twin pump flow testing, that was all done a long time ago on a different test rig but the information is out there.
As for the twin pump flow testing, that was all done a long time ago on a different test rig but the information is out there.
#26
iTrader: (10)
Great info--THANK YOU for sharing! I still don't understand why the eff Aeromotive reversed the polarity on the pump--for making a Walbro-255-esque replacement this seems like a foolish mistake.
I have been very happy with my uber-quiet DW300 on my X, never whines like my walbro did on all of my previous cars. It wasn't enough for my setup though and in planning I thought it would be.
Just curious, can your testing rig run at higher than 14v? I have a BAP on my DW300 and curious how all of these pumps perform at higher voltage against each other....
I have been very happy with my uber-quiet DW300 on my X, never whines like my walbro did on all of my previous cars. It wasn't enough for my setup though and in planning I thought it would be.
Just curious, can your testing rig run at higher than 14v? I have a BAP on my DW300 and curious how all of these pumps perform at higher voltage against each other....
#27
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the newer Aeromotive 340 pumps I believe they switched the polarity back to normal. But don't quote me on that.
My rig can go higher than 14v but its all taken apart and wont be setup again until a new generation of pumps comes along to be tested.
My rig can go higher than 14v but its all taken apart and wont be setup again until a new generation of pumps comes along to be tested.
Great info--THANK YOU for sharing! I still don't understand why the eff Aeromotive reversed the polarity on the pump--for making a Walbro-255-esque replacement this seems like a foolish mistake.
I have been very happy with my uber-quiet DW300 on my X, never whines like my walbro did on all of my previous cars. It wasn't enough for my setup though and in planning I thought it would be.
Just curious, can your testing rig run at higher than 14v? I have a BAP on my DW300 and curious how all of these pumps perform at higher voltage against each other....
I have been very happy with my uber-quiet DW300 on my X, never whines like my walbro did on all of my previous cars. It wasn't enough for my setup though and in planning I thought it would be.
Just curious, can your testing rig run at higher than 14v? I have a BAP on my DW300 and curious how all of these pumps perform at higher voltage against each other....
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...flow-test.html
I'll post a link if Scott is ok with the photochop.
While it does much better than a single pump at low to mid pressures, if you are running mad boost it's barely equal to the Aeromotive 340. This was dual INTERNAL pumps which usually start bleeding pressure at 80+ psi where as dual EXTERNAL pumps would hold better on the top end. I guess at that point you could run a Dual Bosch or something but I can definitely see why people have one pump cycle off at lower pressures with a hobbs boost switch or MAF airflow signal on dual pump setups.
I like the idea of sticking with a single pump if possible, the thought of one pump failing in a twin setup makes me cringe. At least if it fails on a single pump (barring partial failure) the car will just stop moving.
Last edited by Hiboost; Aug 8, 2011 at 09:51 AM.
#29
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im a big fan of single pump systems also for the exact same reason. As far as posting up a graph keep in mind its kind of the same idea as comparing different shops dyno numbers. There are always variables that will make them slightly different. But go ahead I am always up for more information!
Not to sidetrack in an AMS forum area, but I did a quickie plot for a Dual Walbro in MS Paint using the data in this other thread for comparison.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...flow-test.html
I'll post a link if Scott is ok with the photochop.
While it does much better than a single pump at low to mid pressures, if you are running mad boost it's barely equal to the Aeromotive 340. I guess at that point you could run a Dual Bosch or something. I can definitely see why people have one pump cycle off at lower pressures with a hobbs boost switch or MAF airflow signal on dual pump setups.
I like the idea of sticking with a single pump if possible, the thought of one pump failing in a twin setup makes me cringe. At least if it fails on a single pump (barring partial failure) the car will just stop moving.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...flow-test.html
I'll post a link if Scott is ok with the photochop.
While it does much better than a single pump at low to mid pressures, if you are running mad boost it's barely equal to the Aeromotive 340. I guess at that point you could run a Dual Bosch or something. I can definitely see why people have one pump cycle off at lower pressures with a hobbs boost switch or MAF airflow signal on dual pump setups.
I like the idea of sticking with a single pump if possible, the thought of one pump failing in a twin setup makes me cringe. At least if it fails on a single pump (barring partial failure) the car will just stop moving.
#30
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Im a big fan of single pump systems also for the exact same reason. As far as posting up a graph keep in mind its kind of the same idea as comparing different shops dyno numbers. There are always variables that will make them slightly different. But go ahead I am always up for more information!
My previous Evo X had Dual Walbro externals feeding off a fuel surge tank so they likely flowed slightly better from 80psi+ due to no bypass valve on the internal pumps opening up on a double pumper setup. Since boost won't be going over 32-35 psi anyway it probably doesn't really factor in.
So like Scott said, take the direct comparisons with a grain of salt since they were gathered with two different setups and I just eyeballed the data plots for the Dual Walbro internal setup based on the data from the other shop in their chart. Still, it might give you a rough idea of what a dual pump setup can do, seems like a dual Bosch would be similar on the bottem end but deliver more up top. Most people would be comparing the 70-80 psi area since that is 27-37 psi boost from the turbo (assuming 43 psi base fuel pressure).
Last edited by Hiboost; Aug 8, 2011 at 11:39 PM.