Notices

Bumper Laws Harmonized with US

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2008, 07:16 PM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
robyn402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rontam90
question: anyone know the reason behind lotus elises not being admissible for import to canada? is it due to the bumper requirements or another reason?

some used 06 elises are going for low 30's with about 5000 miles
i've see 3 elises every summer in edmonton
Old Jul 4, 2008, 07:26 PM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ambystom01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 15,629
Likes: 0
Received 75 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by Reba
well from what ive read my understanding is that its admissable
im gonna go look for one this week, ill tell u if it gets impounded lol
I have no idea if I'm reading the info right but to me it looks like they're still black listed. It doesn't appear to be a retroactive law but rather only applicable to cars made from 2007 onwards which certainly makes the new evo applicable but not the older models.
Old Jul 4, 2008, 07:30 PM
  #33  
Newbie
 
rontam90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Previous evos (8, 9) are now admissible, along with the Toyota MR-S.

Im still sad that the elises are not
Old Jul 4, 2008, 07:35 PM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ambystom01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 15,629
Likes: 0
Received 75 Likes on 68 Posts
Where is the proof of this? I can't find any of this on the RIV site.
Old Jul 4, 2008, 07:46 PM
  #35  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Reba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ADMISSIBLE
2000 Galant & Eclipse>

1993 TO 2008 All models except those listed in the inadmissible column. If the vehicle was built AFTER September 1st, 2007. [EIS] (see notes)

2009
All models


inadmissable coloumn is empty, and EIS states that cars after 2007 must have an immobilizer

http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/impor...MITSUBISHI.htm
Old Jul 4, 2008, 07:52 PM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ambystom01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 15,629
Likes: 0
Received 75 Likes on 68 Posts
Ah k, I was reading that as meaning that Galants and Eclipses from 1993-2008 were fine but for other cars 2007 was the limit.
Old Jul 4, 2008, 09:18 PM
  #37  
Newbie
 
evo.ca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oakville
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time to look for an Evo X!!!!!
Old Jul 5, 2008, 10:34 AM
  #38  
Evolving Member
 
enjoku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or even an Evo 9 MR
Old Jul 6, 2008, 08:04 AM
  #39  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
kxwhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chauvin, AB
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^x2!

now just have to find an insurance company
Old Jul 6, 2008, 12:00 PM
  #40  
Newbie
 
BlaqueGhost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
since the bumper laws are harmonized with th US does that open international trade as well? Specifically from Japan... if so, . It would make sense if the only thing that wasn't at par with Canada was the bumper
Old Jul 6, 2008, 01:07 PM
  #41  
Former Sponsor
 
evo_soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the land between lancer and evo
Posts: 2,362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
haha ya but its going to take law suits to get the Canadian arm of the auto companies to honour warranty service.

currently they are dragging their feet.
Old Jul 6, 2008, 08:00 PM
  #42  
Newbie
 
evo.ca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oakville
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evo_soul
haha ya but its going to take law suits to get the Canadian arm of the auto companies to honour warranty service.

currently they are dragging their feet.
No warranty coverage on any Mitsubishi cars, but if the saving are enough to off set the warranty issues it might not be a bad option.
Old Jul 6, 2008, 08:04 PM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ambystom01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 15,629
Likes: 0
Received 75 Likes on 68 Posts
You will have warranty coverage it just won't be through Mitsubishi Canada.
Old Jul 7, 2008, 06:38 AM
  #44  
Newbie
 
evo.ca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oakville
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ambystom01
You will have warranty coverage it just won't be through Mitsubishi Canada.
What do you mean by that??
Old Jul 7, 2008, 06:58 AM
  #45  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
06_RALLI///ART's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^meaning you will have to go back to the US for any warranty issues

im already in search for my WW Viii MR



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:29 PM.