Notices

Stage 1 2012 GSR felt slower than stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2013 | 01:54 PM
  #31  
raidokoiv's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: est
Originally Posted by 3000GT-GTO
Have anyone experienced or felt stage 1 map was actually slower than stock?
Ever since the flash I have always felt the car was much weaker or less torque around 3500 rpm, and today while i was on the highway going WOT on third gear car just felt like it wasn't pulling like before. So I immediately exit off ramp and enters gas station
UNINSTALLED AP or Unmarried, and Bingo TORQUE is strong again like first day I got the car.

Through out the entire week, i have been using AP to monitor Live Knock everyday
so every time i am going WOT I checked for Knock Sum on AP.

I have tried all 3 maps ACN, 91, 93 Octane and all result less torque or weaker acceleration.

I wanted know if anyone with 2012 using stage 1 map experience the same as I do.


PS I am using 2012 Beta V201 Maps
I am boosting 24-26 PSI on stage 1 maps
Car is bone STOCK no modification
I have same year GSR,stock with kn drop in. I recently got an ap.Cobb suggested the use of v401 93 and i tried.
Same problem i feel turbo lag, less torque or weaker acceleration compared to stock map.
I am boosting 24-25.5 PSI

Last edited by raidokoiv; Aug 3, 2013 at 01:58 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2013 | 11:24 AM
  #32  
raidokoiv's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: est
AP uninstalled and car lives again.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2013 | 07:08 AM
  #33  
MRak's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I installed my AP on my 2013 MR last night and did NOT have the same experience as you guys did with the stage 1 reflash. I didn't feel any lag at all. If anything, the car has a lot less lag, which can kind of give the impression of less power because you dont get that surge that you have stock. Anyhow, I cant imagine the MR having such a different response to the reflash so I wonder why the difference in results...? It didnt make the car a monster by any stretch but I defintely noticed some gains.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2013 | 12:42 AM
  #34  
raidokoiv's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: est
Today i feel the map works fine,it seems ecu learned something, Latest v401 93. First I drove before half a hour and then i made a three 3rd gear pulls, flat out, 2000 to redline as suggested by cobb. I attached datalog. AP screen shows knock sum 0/2 and 0/1 ,dont know what this mean.
sorry but i do not know how to upload csv file
http://www.upload.ee/files/3500788/3...talog.csv.html
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2013 | 02:52 PM
  #35  
Kendogg's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Interesting. I had a 2012 but didnt use the cobb ap. I did use the ap for my 2013 and stage 1 stock evo felt a world of different over the stock tune

edit*** Now this may just be in my mind but a stock Evo is less then impressive IMO. But my 2013 stock felt quicker then my 2012 stock. Again, I have no proof of power comparisons. Just what I felt

Last edited by Kendogg; Aug 17, 2013 at 02:54 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2013evolution
Cobb AccessPORT
1
May 2, 2016 05:16 PM
alfredoaal
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
18
Oct 26, 2015 01:43 PM
alexn103
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
1
Aug 13, 2015 02:23 PM
Dmarianodesign
09+ Lancer Ralliart General
14
Jun 21, 2014 08:44 AM
The_Police
Cobb AccessPORT
1
May 26, 2014 07:12 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:17 PM.