new best time
new best time
let me know what ya'll think of my time
r/t- .79
60ft- 1.78
1/8 et- 8.00
1/8 mph- 84.19
1/4 et- 12.52
1/4mph- 109.46
car was capable of a 12.3 but due to my crappy reaction times i ran like crap. thanks to al and the great tune and install by matt55 i ran what i did. i was running 25psi of boost on 110oct.. had 3psi to go but ran outta time. let me know what ya'll think.
r/t- .79
60ft- 1.78
1/8 et- 8.00
1/8 mph- 84.19
1/4 et- 12.52
1/4mph- 109.46
car was capable of a 12.3 but due to my crappy reaction times i ran like crap. thanks to al and the great tune and install by matt55 i ran what i did. i was running 25psi of boost on 110oct.. had 3psi to go but ran outta time. let me know what ya'll think.
Last edited by freshevo8; Sep 17, 2005 at 09:55 AM.
thing i dont understand is i think i would be running faster with my cams in there. i dont know how i could drive much better. temps were in the mid 80's but it was very humid and i was sweating like a pig. i'm thinking about goin with an intake to let the car breathe some more instead of just using the k&n drop in. seems like the car is running pretty rich too and a custom tune by Al would help me out i'm sure.
Originally Posted by midwestmonster
Your sixty foots need a little work. With cams, you should easily get low 1.7s or mid to high 1.6s.
and yes 1.6's - 1.7's are possible on the stock clutch.
Trending Topics
I meant that with the cams, I would think they would help you come out of the hole a little faster. You just need some practice launching the car. I wasn't criticizing or anything like that.
Originally Posted by dadriva
Uhhh, maybe I misunderstood your post. What would cams have to do with a 60'?? He should already be able to bang off 1.7's - 1.6's etc... with stock or aftermarket cams.
and yes 1.6's - 1.7's are possible on the stock clutch.
and yes 1.6's - 1.7's are possible on the stock clutch.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



