Evolved Member
Quote:
*sigh*Originally Posted by PA-silver03evo
And this was on a mustang dyno! Nice.
This is why I hate boasting numbers from the CFT dyno. People think it reads lower than a Dynojet...
Evolved Member
Quote:
This is why I hate boasting numbers from the CFT dyno. People think it reads lower than a Dynojet...
Im gona agree with you on this one Warrtalon. I saw a post of someone on boost creeps, they had dynoed their car at Titan which is a DYNOJET, they went to CFT to dyno the car and the hp diference was VERY minimal, numbers between both dynos were very close.Originally Posted by Warrtalon
*sigh*This is why I hate boasting numbers from the CFT dyno. People think it reads lower than a Dynojet...
Evolved Member
Quote:
This is why I hate boasting numbers from the CFT dyno. People think it reads lower than a Dynojet...
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
*sigh*This is why I hate boasting numbers from the CFT dyno. People think it reads lower than a Dynojet...

Evolved Member
For thouse that are wondering what this car looks like i will post pics later on today.
Good job eddie hard work pays off man.
Good job eddie hard work pays off man.
Account Disabled
Quote:
He is using AEM standalone.Originally Posted by smp3000
Aren't you the guy with the microtech?
EVIL_EVO_VIII vbmenu_register("postmenu_2492040", true);
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando,FL
Drives: 2005 EB EVO VIII GSR
Online
Oct 28, 2005, 08:21 AM #19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
*sigh*
This is why I hate boasting numbers from the CFT dyno. People think it reads lower than a Dynojet...
Im gona agree with you on this one Warrtalon. I saw a post of someone on boost creeps, they had dynoed their car at Titan which is a DYNOJET, they went to CFT to dyno the car and the hp diference was VERY minimal, numbers between both dynos were very close.
EVIL_EVO_VIII vbmenu_register("postmenu_2362923", true);
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando,FL
Drives: 2005 EB EVO VIII GSR
Offline
Sep 18, 2005, 08:40 PM #202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Ok, so let's say the CFT Mustang Dyno is calibrated like it should be. That means MarksEvo, or whatever, is making more power than Bushcur's White Evo w/20g that ran 11.3s. Hmm, something tells me NO! He didn't even have alky injection and was on 93oct. Gimme a break! How do you explain this discrepancy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVIL_EVO_VIII
i have said, the Dyno at CFT IS VERY ACCURATE and is one of the lowest reading dynos. An Evo making 335whp with cams is a good number and i dont think its inflated at all. Jose was running close to low 11's and almost hitting the 120mph mark with 95 degree weather run after run. If the guy making 335whp and doesnt run low 1/4 then obviously is driver, simple as that.As stated before also, Rolo at CFT is a great tuner and no doubt about it, so is John@ Jester, hes been tunning dsm for years and years that u probably dont even come close to it. The cars at their shop are great examples of it
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando,FL
Drives: 2005 EB EVO VIII GSR
Online
Oct 28, 2005, 08:21 AM #19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
*sigh*
This is why I hate boasting numbers from the CFT dyno. People think it reads lower than a Dynojet...
Im gona agree with you on this one Warrtalon. I saw a post of someone on boost creeps, they had dynoed their car at Titan which is a DYNOJET, they went to CFT to dyno the car and the hp diference was VERY minimal, numbers between both dynos were very close.
EVIL_EVO_VIII vbmenu_register("postmenu_2362923", true);
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando,FL
Drives: 2005 EB EVO VIII GSR
Offline
Sep 18, 2005, 08:40 PM #202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Ok, so let's say the CFT Mustang Dyno is calibrated like it should be. That means MarksEvo, or whatever, is making more power than Bushcur's White Evo w/20g that ran 11.3s. Hmm, something tells me NO! He didn't even have alky injection and was on 93oct. Gimme a break! How do you explain this discrepancy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVIL_EVO_VIII
i have said, the Dyno at CFT IS VERY ACCURATE and is one of the lowest reading dynos. An Evo making 335whp with cams is a good number and i dont think its inflated at all. Jose was running close to low 11's and almost hitting the 120mph mark with 95 degree weather run after run. If the guy making 335whp and doesnt run low 1/4 then obviously is driver, simple as that.As stated before also, Rolo at CFT is a great tuner and no doubt about it, so is John@ Jester, hes been tunning dsm for years and years that u probably dont even come close to it. The cars at their shop are great examples of it
Quote:
Thanks guy's the car is fine; we hope to get in to the 10's on the 1st test run and looking for Mph Originally Posted by InfraRed
nothing too serious i hope. i really wanna see what it can really do.
Quote:
Yes but now we are”AEM" thanks to CFT!! Originally Posted by smp3000
Aren't you the guy with the microtech?
Evolved Member
craziest part about this is it was achieved on a mustang dyno...
Evolved Member
torque like wow!
nice job.could u give some more info on the other mods that you have?
thanks
nice job.could u give some more info on the other mods that you have?
thanks
