Notices
Drag Racing Find out the best way to launch and see what kind of times other people are posting. No posting of street racing related stories!

13.0 What ya think?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #16  
Silver06evo9mr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
gotta love the 9...
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #17  
AirNKAir5's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
My friend ran a 12.9... the other day with just an exhaust on the IX, he is a good driver, so if you take out the subs and spare tire, u will break 12's with the way u r driving now.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #18  
520hpsti's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: portage, MI / STL, MO
damn i hate you MR drivers!!

haha just playing, sweet times!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #19  
EVOMIZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 1
From: CT
not bad for a catback only
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #20  
NIevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 4
From: Hayden, ID
Work on the 60ft's and take out some weight and you will be well into the 12's.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #21  
EvoRecordSetter's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Like Jeff said, considering I ran a 12.30@107.99 today, the only thing he needs for 12s is to learn to drive.

How amazing is it, though, that he traps 107+ with just a cat-back that really doesn't help anyway on an otherwise stock IX, poor driving, and extra weight while I sometimes only trap 107.xx with all my mods, 26psi, cams and alky, haha. IXs at sea level > Warr.
+1 IX's are SOOO STRONG!!

your car is very strong to trap at 107 with cat-back now you need to drive it better! no one should expect a 12.3@ 107 like war said, but at 107 you should expect to see mid-high 12's all day. you got a time slip? i bet your 60 foot was 1.8 or so, and you didnt shift that fast?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #22  
Silver06evo9mr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
yea i shifted fast, and as it said in the begining i had a 1.888 on my best 60ft and 1.9 the rest. With a 1.75 should i see 12.5 ish? that sounds a little crazy with only a tenth better 60ft. and i ran 13.0 3 times in a row so i figured my car couldnt do that much better, maybe a 12.8 12.9 with that 1.75 60 ft. Thanks for all the compliments tho!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #23  
Danny23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
From: orange county NY
cut a 1.7ish 60 ft and your definetly in the 12,s
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:50 PM
  #24  
Rich_1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
hmm i wonder what a IX RS could run.... if an MR with all that weight can do 13.0 or less......
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #25  
Silver06evo9mr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Sorry kinda hard to see, here is the slip, Left side
Attached Thumbnails 13.0 What ya think?-track-009.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 02:10 PM
  #26  
Rnm's Avatar
Rnm
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Nice trap speed.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #27  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
You can run a 12 with a slightly better launch. 107 is very good trap speed!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 02:18 PM
  #28  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Actually, you may have thought you shifted fast, but your timeslip indicates otherwise. Even with a 1.8-1.9 60', you would have been in the 12s with such a high trap speed if you were shifting fast. I again reference my 12.30 @ 107.99 from yesterday. That's a 1.72 60', but extremely fast shifting. Don't try to get 12.30, but you should definitely try for 12.8, even on an average 60' in the 1.8s.

Rich_1, the MR only weighs 70lbs more than an RS, which roughly equates to .07s in the 1/4-mile. Proplery driven, a IX RS can run 12.7 stock in good conditions.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #29  
Rich_1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Rich_1, the MR only weighs 70lbs more than an RS, which roughly equates to .07s in the 1/4-mile. Proplery driven, a IX RS can run 12.7 stock in good conditions.[/QUOTE]


i never knew the weight diffrence between the MR and the RS i always thought it was quite a bit more then 70 lbs tho...
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #30  
Silver06evo9mr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Actually, you may have thought you shifted fast, but your timeslip indicates otherwise. Even with a 1.8-1.9 60', you would have been in the 12s with such a high trap speed if you were shifting fast. I again reference my 12.30 @ 107.99 from yesterday. That's a 1.72 60', but extremely fast shifting. Don't try to get 12.30, but you should definitely try for 12.8, even on an average 60' in the 1.8s.

Rich_1, the MR only weighs 70lbs more than an RS, which roughly equates to .07s in the 1/4-mile. Proplery driven, a IX RS can run 12.7 stock in good conditions.

Besides the obvious answer to "what is extremely fast shifting" how can i drive "better". Should i just slam the gears real fast, and shift at redline? Is not letting off the gas a good thing to do while shifting? Give me details. I know im makin this really difficult, im just not an extremely good Track driver, ive only been about 5 times.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 AM.