First time at he track...dissapointed in myself
Oct 16, 2006, 08:31 AM
#16
I had the same issue, My limiter killed any launch I could get. And when I tried to launch the clutch simply did not hold (cold car from sitting in the pits for 2 hours 
).
Hey John I have your map I was just wondering he best way to upload it? Thanks.
).Hey John I have your map I was just wondering he best way to upload it? Thanks.
Oct 16, 2006, 04:46 PM
#17
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MitsuEvoIIX
not every1 can run a 13.2 stock kid especially wit an 05 
. P.S. I almost forgot you had the limiter disconnected also
Last edited by SRT-TO-EVO; Oct 16, 2006 at 04:49 PM.
Oct 17, 2006, 02:57 PM
#22
Originally Posted by SRT-TO-EVO
Yeah but with a 1.7 60ft. My 1.9 is only .1 second behind yours in the quarter. With a 1.7 I should be around a 13 flat. So whose car is faster again (stock)? .
P.S. I almost forgot you had the limiter disconnected also
. P.S. I almost forgot you had the limiter disconnected also
So I guess mine is But seriously, that's not too bad. I also came from an SRT-4 and launching an AWD is not as easy as it looks.
Oct 17, 2006, 04:38 PM
#23
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsmfan95
I went 13.1 stock with the stock 5k limiter So I guess mine is
But seriously, that's not too bad. I also came from an SRT-4 and launching an AWD is not as easy as it looks.
So I guess mine is But seriously, that's not too bad. I also came from an SRT-4 and launching an AWD is not as easy as it looks.
Oct 18, 2006, 09:15 AM
#25
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboIX
LOl I thought I was going to see 14s...You got low 13s in a stock EVo. that's good times man, what did you expect low 12s?
Oct 18, 2006, 09:58 AM
#26
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in PA
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey, you didn't do that bad, my first time with 450miles I went a 13.9@99, NOW after 2 months of Practice, and MUCH better Launching I trimmed it to a 13.09@105.50 here's the link to my Thread on it:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=229080
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=229080
Last edited by 11SECEVO; Oct 18, 2006 at 10:22 AM.
Oct 18, 2006, 10:08 AM
#27
Evolved Member
You didn't do bad. As was mentioned, there is no substitute for seat time.
When I was getting 2.0 60' times, I couldn't get better than 12.9.
Now, with a decent clutch and lots a practice, I get 1.6-1.7 and my time is down to 12.35.
It seems that every .1 you can get out of your 60' equates to like .3 at the other end. Maybe more.
When I was getting 2.0 60' times, I couldn't get better than 12.9.
Now, with a decent clutch and lots a practice, I get 1.6-1.7 and my time is down to 12.35.
It seems that every .1 you can get out of your 60' equates to like .3 at the other end. Maybe more.
Oct 18, 2006, 11:29 AM
#28
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikesevo8
You didn't do bad. As was mentioned, there is no substitute for seat time.
When I was getting 2.0 60' times, I couldn't get better than 12.9.
Now, with a decent clutch and lots a practice, I get 1.6-1.7 and my time is down to 12.35.
It seems that every .1 you can get out of your 60' equates to like .3 at the other end. Maybe more.
When I was getting 2.0 60' times, I couldn't get better than 12.9.
Now, with a decent clutch and lots a practice, I get 1.6-1.7 and my time is down to 12.35.
It seems that every .1 you can get out of your 60' equates to like .3 at the other end. Maybe more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post