someone help me understand.... 11.8 @119mph??
Oct 25, 2006, 09:44 PM
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
someone help me understand.... 11.8 @119mph??
heres my slip my others are very similar no more than a tenth off
rt- .003
60'- 1.67
330'- 4.953
660'- 7.656
mph- 90.04
1000'- 9.960
1/4- 11.883
mph- 119.02
stock turbo w/ all normal bolt ons
Now why am i only running an 11.8..... with my trap and my 60' i think i sould be much lower.
thanks for any input
rt- .003
60'- 1.67
330'- 4.953
660'- 7.656
mph- 90.04
1000'- 9.960
1/4- 11.883
mph- 119.02
stock turbo w/ all normal bolt ons
Now why am i only running an 11.8..... with my trap and my 60' i think i sould be much lower.
thanks for any input
Oct 25, 2006, 09:59 PM
#4
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my mods are just the basic bolt ons
stock turbo
ebay o2
272's
intake
3 in exhaust no cat
forge dv
greddy ebc
100oct tune ecutek 22psi -safe tune for track days-
nothing too special
tires are 255/17 on ra-1 on te37's
I know the 60 is good it just seems like i should be more toward mid to low 11's
stock turbo
ebay o2
272's
intake
3 in exhaust no cat
forge dv
greddy ebc
100oct tune ecutek 22psi -safe tune for track days-
nothing too special
tires are 255/17 on ra-1 on te37's
I know the 60 is good it just seems like i should be more toward mid to low 11's
Oct 25, 2006, 10:04 PM
#5
Evolving Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Inland Empire (Running Springs)
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
your car is a top end monster 29 in the back half is great. your 1/8 is where you are losing maybe .1. I ran 11.99 at 114 and a 12.0 @ 115 if i had the top end you have I would guess an 11.7. I don't think your ime is off much. Nice work on the stock turbo
Trending Topics
Oct 25, 2006, 10:37 PM
#9
Yeah, you're right. Your launch and mph were good enough for an 11.5 with that mph, but the 11.8 is kind of disturbing. It seems you have an extremely slow 1-2 and 2-3 shift, then your top end just makes up for that. Here are my splits on my 12.000 @ 113 run, and you will see what I mean:
60' - 1.66
330' - 4.92
660' - 7.63 @ 90.87
1000' - 10.001
1320' - 12.000 @ 113
You were slower to the 1/8th (barely) with a very similar 1/8th mph, but then you raped me on the back half and pulled away by over a tenth. I'm not sure why your mph was weak in the 1/8th relative to your 1/4mph, but I can say that the 1/8th mph is much more likely at 22psi than the 1/4mph trap. It is hard for a gt35r to pick up 29mph in the back half on 22psi much less doing it on a stock turbo with a conservative tune. I'm actually not sure how you make 380whp on an VIII with conservative boost and tuning. That's impressive.
How much (if any) weight reduction have you done to the RS? That may help explain things. They only weigh 68lbs less than an MR when stock, so that's less than a .1s/1mph difference.
60' - 1.66
330' - 4.92
660' - 7.63 @ 90.87
1000' - 10.001
1320' - 12.000 @ 113
You were slower to the 1/8th (barely) with a very similar 1/8th mph, but then you raped me on the back half and pulled away by over a tenth. I'm not sure why your mph was weak in the 1/8th relative to your 1/4mph, but I can say that the 1/8th mph is much more likely at 22psi than the 1/4mph trap. It is hard for a gt35r to pick up 29mph in the back half on 22psi much less doing it on a stock turbo with a conservative tune. I'm actually not sure how you make 380whp on an VIII with conservative boost and tuning. That's impressive.
How much (if any) weight reduction have you done to the RS? That may help explain things. They only weigh 68lbs less than an MR when stock, so that's less than a .1s/1mph difference.
Oct 25, 2006, 10:57 PM
#10
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I on the run posted above i actually shifted pretty aggressively i still lifted between shifts but 1-2 shift chirped and all my other shifts were strong. i didnt lift on the 3-4 shift.
my rs is full weight the main reductions are spare, coilovers and exhaust other wise nothing extreme
My car has always been a strong car i beat the stock turbo record at my shop by almost 30 hp, we actully turned the boost up to 23psi and made 396whp and 368wtq but my run was at 380whp 360wtq.
also my dyno number were on a dynapack at SRM which reads identical to Groupe-s mustang dyno(just for forum reference) i made 320/300 at srm and 319/300 at groupe-s
I did a back to back eairler this year.
thanks again for everyones input
my rs is full weight the main reductions are spare, coilovers and exhaust other wise nothing extreme
My car has always been a strong car i beat the stock turbo record at my shop by almost 30 hp, we actully turned the boost up to 23psi and made 396whp and 368wtq but my run was at 380whp 360wtq.
also my dyno number were on a dynapack at SRM which reads identical to Groupe-s mustang dyno(just for forum reference) i made 320/300 at srm and 319/300 at groupe-s
I did a back to back eairler this year.
thanks again for everyones input
Last edited by jbfoco; Oct 25, 2006 at 11:00 PM.
Oct 26, 2006, 07:40 AM
#13
That is def. a back end monster. Like what Saywhen and Warr said you fast enough for 11.5-6s. But I agree with Warr you 1-2, 2-3 might need to be faster or at a diff. rpm.
Is that 22 peak boost? Or 25 peak then holding at 22 to 7k? I.e. when I go to 25 peak on 100oct it is 22 at redline.
Is that 22 peak boost? Or 25 peak then holding at 22 to 7k? I.e. when I go to 25 peak on 100oct it is 22 at redline.
