Good to see you sticking with it.

A- another boost leak test may be in order according to your dyno sheets.
B- re-adjust your 2 step to "hit" after peak torque-- you are falling out of your powerband on the launch>> The dashboard vids are great!
C- Practice practice practice,,, there's 3-4mph lost between your right hand to your left foot!!! .... j/k

Keep at it!! I enjoyed the footage.

 

All comments well noted! Especially No. 3!

From my logs it does not seem that there is a boost leak. The AEM map sensor i think its pretty accurate. It holds boost almost flat. What i might check is the afrs since the first saturday out the car was running mid to high 10s and now it was running high 10s. Maybe the IAT compensation needs some work...

 

The other line on the dyno sheet is TQ, not boost...

Kouzman, good stuff.. Once you get it all together it will put up 132-134mph traps like poloicebergs 6262 car.. You guys are making almost the same power.

Junior

 

congrats, keep up the good work. Getting better. Just need the seat time.

 

"Holy Sarcasm Batman!!"... LMAO on that one


Fs635 dyno sheet,,,





Fs635 vs hta86 just for comparison,,,




Kouzman's boost leak,,,




Since there's no "Control X" feature that moves the curve over to the left like the other 2 sheets, my guess is you should start looking for the bugs.

Compare the graphs as they cross the 200hp/rpm mark and let me know what you think!



Good to see you still have a great sense of humor! >>> See ya next week!

 

Still dont see what you are getting at. .. I see a 155mph car's graph vs a pumpgas 130mph car.. Whats the comparison??

My guess is the car is working just fine. His HP and TQ are the same as another customers car that traps 134 on 93.. So with some driving the MPH will come up. If you think that a car @ 3400lbs with 26-27psi trapping 132+ on 93 has issues, I can only guess your car is or was performing much better then this one under the same conditions.

See you this weekend

Junior

 

Whoa Zorro,,, put down your sword!!

Post up "the other customer's" graph so we can compare tq at 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, and 6000.

I was mearly using the other graphs since they are the same turbo on 2.0 motors. If you can please share a different vehicle with no bugs with the same combo, maybe you'll clearly see that your over to the right about 500-1000rpm.

ps.

We all know dyno sheets don't rule the world, but they are sure fun to look at.

Edit:
Even though a 6262, this graph is from the same dyno with you behind the keyboard right?

5250rpm has almost 150hp more.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ml#post7002632

Are the fs635's that much laggier?

 

I had the same questions on the slower spool up.. But I found out on this particular pull the header was cold, causing the loss of a few hundred rpm on spool up. Plus what ever the cams are\ degred in you can see this car pulls to the MOON! So that will slow spool up some too.