Control Over Boost Seileniod
I am not trying to flame, just want to ask a question. Here you say testing has shown some boost taper, especially in 3rd, but then you argue it will hit 20 and stay there just a few posts later. Which is it?
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
It works realy good - hits about 18.5 - 19 falling to 17 in 3rd gear and 20 flat falling to 19 in 4th and 5th
I have done it on at least 15 evos now with no problems so I would say the testing phase is over
I have done it on at least 15 evos now with no problems so I would say the testing phase is over
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Exactly.
There is no fluxuation in boost - it hits the target and stays there - normal evo boost taper to red line of 1.5 - 2 psi as you reach the red line
There is no fluxuation in boost - it hits the target and stays there - normal evo boost taper to red line of 1.5 - 2 psi as you reach the red line
No, that is not what he is saying. Al says in the 2nd quote that a normal evo will taper 1.5 to 2psi as you reach redline, but his new flash will not taper. In the first quote he admits the new flash tapers in 3rd gear, but not as much in 4th and 5th. Which is it?
Read these posts for your answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nebolic
questio? If the boost is set and controlled by the ECU how come it still tapers? Just curious cause if the ECU is controlling the boost and you tell it to boost 20psi, shouldn't it technically stay at 20psi without tapering since the ECU is wanting it to boost 20psi?
Nebo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynoflash
Even with MBC all evos taper boost slightly on top due to the fact that the stock turbo has a hard time holding high boost to red line
Quote:
Originally Posted by nebolic
questio? If the boost is set and controlled by the ECU how come it still tapers? Just curious cause if the ECU is controlling the boost and you tell it to boost 20psi, shouldn't it technically stay at 20psi without tapering since the ECU is wanting it to boost 20psi?
Nebo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynoflash
Even with MBC all evos taper boost slightly on top due to the fact that the stock turbo has a hard time holding high boost to red line
Last edited by expatevo; Mar 10, 2005 at 07:40 AM.
An MBC opens the waste-gate at a set pressure point, regardless of rpm. As rpm rise, there are inefficiencies in your boost system that become more noticeable, so your boost pressure drops, even though the MBC still sees the exact same pressure as before. That's why an MBC still tapers as much as 2 psi.
Only an EBC can compensate for this dynamic behaviour by emulating an MBC with a spring that becomes "stiffer" as the rpms climb, so the boost curve is truly flat. An EBC is nothing but a computer connected to an electronically actuated boost solenoid.
From the factory setup, your ECU acts as the EBC controlling the stock boost solenoid. It adjust the "spring stiffness" of the solenoid based on such factors as gas quality, weather conditions (colder air is denser), and rpm levels.
Ideally, if you can fully control the software logic in the ECU code that controls the boost solenoid, you can not only change the peak value of the boost curve, but also its shape to anything you want - taper, rise, flat, whatever.
As a result one key advantage of an EBC vs. an MBC is that you can set boost to build faster (keeping the solenoid fully closed at low rpm), without getting massive boost spikes at mid rpm, and no taper at high rpm. Typical EBC curves show a slight "overshoot" in the beginning, and then become flat about 0.5 psi lower than the peak through the remaining rpm band, all the way to redline.
Only an EBC can compensate for this dynamic behaviour by emulating an MBC with a spring that becomes "stiffer" as the rpms climb, so the boost curve is truly flat. An EBC is nothing but a computer connected to an electronically actuated boost solenoid.
From the factory setup, your ECU acts as the EBC controlling the stock boost solenoid. It adjust the "spring stiffness" of the solenoid based on such factors as gas quality, weather conditions (colder air is denser), and rpm levels.
Ideally, if you can fully control the software logic in the ECU code that controls the boost solenoid, you can not only change the peak value of the boost curve, but also its shape to anything you want - taper, rise, flat, whatever.
As a result one key advantage of an EBC vs. an MBC is that you can set boost to build faster (keeping the solenoid fully closed at low rpm), without getting massive boost spikes at mid rpm, and no taper at high rpm. Typical EBC curves show a slight "overshoot" in the beginning, and then become flat about 0.5 psi lower than the peak through the remaining rpm band, all the way to redline.
Originally Posted by MadMsheen
Al, have you tried this on an MR? Since the MRs run 20.3 stock, I wonder if it is possible to take it to 21 psi. I plan on getting a flash in the near future, and would rather have the boost flash than the MBC.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Taking my words out of context and attempting to imply there is a contradiction is not something I would expect from you.
It is just that you have said two different things and I am obviously confused, hence why I am asking for clarification from you. I am not a tuner, I don't pretend to be one and I never will be one. But I am a consumer, and as a consumer I would love to be informed about the details inherent in your products. I just want to know if you have control or CONTROL and changing out a boost pill would imply that you just have (lower cased) control.
Originally Posted by jansolo
Sorry Al, don't mean to come off sounding like a dick.
It is just that you have said two different things and I am obviously confused, hence why I am asking for clarification from you.
I am not a tuner, I don't pretend to be one and I never will be one. But I am a consumer, and as a consumer I would love to be informed about the details inherent in your products. I just want to know if you have control or CONTROL and changing out a boost pill would imply that you just have (lower cased) control.

It is just that you have said two different things and I am obviously confused, hence why I am asking for clarification from you. I am not a tuner, I don't pretend to be one and I never will be one. But I am a consumer, and as a consumer I would love to be informed about the details inherent in your products. I just want to know if you have control or CONTROL and changing out a boost pill would imply that you just have (lower cased) control.
In order to help understand the boost control on the EVO, I would like to show you what the map looks like.
Could any of you capable of hosting pictures contact me via e-mail and I will send you screen shots of the Boost control maps.
ben@ecutek.com
Cheers !
Ben
EcuTeK North America
Could any of you capable of hosting pictures contact me via e-mail and I will send you screen shots of the Boost control maps.
ben@ecutek.com
Cheers !
Ben
EcuTeK North America
Originally Posted by Ben - EcuTeK
In order to help understand the boost control on the EVO, I would like to show you what the map looks like.
Could any of you capable of hosting pictures contact me via e-mail and I will send you screen shots of the Boost control maps.
ben@ecutek.com
Cheers !
Ben
EcuTeK North America
Could any of you capable of hosting pictures contact me via e-mail and I will send you screen shots of the Boost control maps.
ben@ecutek.com
Cheers !
Ben
EcuTeK North America
I have included the desired boost map and the turbo dynamics map.
The dynamics is a "boost error" map, so if the boost gets higher or lower
than the desired boost level it will add or remove WG duty accordingly.
We did not invent those; they have always been in the ECU...
I will also go back on the thread and explain more in details if there is a
demand.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information
Regards
Ben Dagenais
The dynamics is a "boost error" map, so if the boost gets higher or lower
than the desired boost level it will add or remove WG duty accordingly.
We did not invent those; they have always been in the ECU...
I will also go back on the thread and explain more in details if there is a
demand.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information
Regards
Ben Dagenais

Originally Posted by voidhawk
Ben - thanks for the data! With access to these types of parameters, can you control the boost curve shape (e.g. taper) by simply changing the desired boost map points?
It is also very depending on the exhaust fitted on the car, cated or not, muffler configuration (baffle), collector,...
You can see that on the desired boost map there is a taper originally, it could be possible that the turbo (physically) might not be capable to hold that boost at high RPMs.
BTW, thanks for posting the pics Void!
Hope this clarify a bit more,
Cheers !
Ben
EcuTeK North America


