Case Study # 123 - Most Powerful Evo IX (so far) - 375 whp ! exhuast, intake & MBC!!
Originally Posted by EVIL_EVO_VIII
05 Evo owners should not trade for a IX, you can save yourself the hassle and the money and waiting to buy a used Evo IX turbo or a Bushur 20g-9!
im almost happy now that my bro wrecked my car! Graphite gray Mr here i come!
Originally Posted by DCSilvrEvo
WOW thats Pretty Serious... Why cant the MIVEC on the intake take another cam?
Last edited by lil'evil_evo; Dec 8, 2005 at 08:55 AM.
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Glendale AZ
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Shiv is reporting 272 whp on his moon dyno with 91 octane and his reflash
I made 289 whp on 91 octane on a mustang dyno on a stock evo this weekend and 300 whp on a evo with some mods still on 91 octane
The power is there on pump gas also
Here is 91 octane IX - injen intake and 3" exhuast - 20 psi tapering to 17 at red line
I made 289 whp on 91 octane on a mustang dyno on a stock evo this weekend and 300 whp on a evo with some mods still on 91 octane
The power is there on pump gas also
Here is 91 octane IX - injen intake and 3" exhuast - 20 psi tapering to 17 at red line
Im adding ALKY and fixing my boost controller.
I had an 03 evo 8 and do not regret getting the IX.
Last edited by PHX_EVO; Dec 8, 2005 at 09:34 AM.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Why would it hit fuel cut when it's flashed with fuel cut removed? Before I even had a flash, I would run 25psi on race gas tuned with my S-AFC and not hit fuel cut or max out the injectors. Why would the stock injectors be a hindrance here at 24-26psi when they aren't a hindrance on the rest of us with the stock turbo.
This looks great ...... I can see my evovIII depreciate right before my very eyes !!!
I like the looks of the X,,,,, see what kinda power they are putting down, they say 300+ stock.
Now when the X comes out and they offer 0% with a 100k warrenty, I might just take a close look at it, and sell my paid off baby.
Great numbers on the 9........ stock 270whp,,,, Im lucky if I put that down with all the mods I have on my car now........grrrrrrrrr and all the money I have thrown at it.
tbe,hks rs,walbro,mbc, dynoflashed...ect ect ect..........
I like the looks of the X,,,,, see what kinda power they are putting down, they say 300+ stock.
Now when the X comes out and they offer 0% with a 100k warrenty, I might just take a close look at it, and sell my paid off baby.
Great numbers on the 9........ stock 270whp,,,, Im lucky if I put that down with all the mods I have on my car now........grrrrrrrrr and all the money I have thrown at it.
tbe,hks rs,walbro,mbc, dynoflashed...ect ect ect..........
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by Event-Horizon
Btw, a "moon" dyno is a Dynodynamics Dyno.
You have to be careful when comparing numbers from different dyno's. Some dyno's produce HP numbers 20% higher than others.
You have to be careful when comparing numbers from different dyno's. Some dyno's produce HP numbers 20% higher than others.
I recall making 320whp (uncorrected and on pump gas) on Stg 1 EVO VIIIs on that same dyno a few years back. That was a pretty big number but I think the winter conditions had a bit to do with it. Corrected, the dyno results were substantially lower. Advertising uncorrected numbers in the winter and corrected numbers in the summer will cause a lot of confusions since the same car, on the same dyno, will vary in output by over 10%.
-shiv
Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Dec 8, 2005 at 10:17 AM.
I cant help but think the 22 degree wicked cold weather is helping out too. None of these EVO IXs have been dynoed in the hot humid summer weather.
I can honestly say last night driving my car home from school in northern NJ my car felt EXTREMELY more powerful, I almost couldnt stop flooring it all over the place because it felt like I had another 20HP!!!!
Im going to Pruven around 19th thru the 24th we'll see how I do in the cold weather...
I can honestly say last night driving my car home from school in northern NJ my car felt EXTREMELY more powerful, I almost couldnt stop flooring it all over the place because it felt like I had another 20HP!!!!
Im going to Pruven around 19th thru the 24th we'll see how I do in the cold weather...
From the wayback files of March 2003...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...yno#post204131
Originally Posted by BatmanGSX
You guys should ignore Shiv's dyno. Why are his numbers so important? AMS got 258whp out of the EVO and then someone ran a 13.5 with their new stock EVO, those two numbers support eachother. Shiv's dyno numbers don't have any real world data to back it up unlike the AMS numbers.
Also, AMS has put a few cars into the 10s. Has Shiv ever even come close to making that kind of power?
AMS doesn't charge $1000 for tooning session that gets you 5whp either. Who you gonna trust?
Also WTF does Shiv's dyno have to do with this thread? Give it up, the EVO makes more power plain and simple. 180hp on a moon dyno doesn't mean **** when the EVO is running mid 13s. You don't run mid 13s on 180whp. I'll stick with the Earth dyno numbers and leave the moon dynos to Australians and WRX guys.
Also, AMS has put a few cars into the 10s. Has Shiv ever even come close to making that kind of power?
AMS doesn't charge $1000 for tooning session that gets you 5whp either. Who you gonna trust?
Also WTF does Shiv's dyno have to do with this thread? Give it up, the EVO makes more power plain and simple. 180hp on a moon dyno doesn't mean **** when the EVO is running mid 13s. You don't run mid 13s on 180whp. I'll stick with the Earth dyno numbers and leave the moon dynos to Australians and WRX guys.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...yno#post204131
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Guys - it seems they have UPGRADED the fuel pumps in the IX also
The Walbro 255 made less of a difference than usual with the pump upgrade
I would say the stock pump is about a 230 lph now
The TQ is now up to 392 - We are now installing a new boost gauge so we can safely turn the boost up a bit higher to try and achive 400 TQ
The Walbro 255 made less of a difference than usual with the pump upgrade
I would say the stock pump is about a 230 lph now
The TQ is now up to 392 - We are now installing a new boost gauge so we can safely turn the boost up a bit higher to try and achive 400 TQ
Tom
Al...I really like the torque numbers that the IX seems to be consistently putting down. On the Evo VIII wheel torque and wheel horsepower seem to always be right around the same figure until you replace the factory 16g. With the IX it seems like the TQ figures are always slightly higher than the HP figures. I imagine that's another factor in why the IX also FEELS noticeably quicker than the VIII.
I apologize if this has already been discussed, but are the IX's higher torque figures more a result of the new snail, the variable intake cam, or a combo of both? Until now I always thought engine stroke was the overriding factor when it comes to turbocharged cars putting down more TQ than HP, but I believe that's always been the same on the 4G63.
I apologize if this has already been discussed, but are the IX's higher torque figures more a result of the new snail, the variable intake cam, or a combo of both? Until now I always thought engine stroke was the overriding factor when it comes to turbocharged cars putting down more TQ than HP, but I believe that's always been the same on the 4G63.
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer
So it has a bigger turbo, valvetrain capable of making the most of other modifications, and a better fuel pump. So put a slightly bigger turbo, cams, a walbro, some 100 octane, and tune an VIII and what do you get? These numbers.
Tom
Tom
