E85 tuning notes
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Now that winter is pretty much over and I've had a chance to drive around in warmer conditions again, I can comment on how E85 performs in winter. First of all, I pretty much stayed off boost for most of winter because I thought that I had a clogged fuel filter that was lowering fuel rail pressure.
However, I did plenty of daily driving during the winter. With the right "cranking enrichment" and ignition timing values, the car starts fine in the coldest temps that I experienced (20 deg F). As far as actually driving the car, what I didn't realized until the temps warmed up is how much less responsive E85 makes the engine in cold weather. I could tell during the winter that the car was ******* a bit, and I figured it was due to E85 not atomizing well in cold weather, but it wasn't until the air temps warmed up that I realized how much it was *******. In warmer weather, the car could accelerate reasonably well while keeping the car off boost, and I could lug the motor around at 1800-2000 rpm no problem. However, in cold weather, I had to get a bit into boost (maybe 3 psi) to get reasonable acceleration and the motor wasn't happy being lugged around below 2000 rpm.
The same sort of thing happens with gasoline, but not nearly as much. I'd say gasoline would be more responsive during daily driving down to about 35 F, and then after that, it would start getting less responsive. It feels like E85 starts getting less responsive below about 50F.
However, I did plenty of daily driving during the winter. With the right "cranking enrichment" and ignition timing values, the car starts fine in the coldest temps that I experienced (20 deg F). As far as actually driving the car, what I didn't realized until the temps warmed up is how much less responsive E85 makes the engine in cold weather. I could tell during the winter that the car was ******* a bit, and I figured it was due to E85 not atomizing well in cold weather, but it wasn't until the air temps warmed up that I realized how much it was *******. In warmer weather, the car could accelerate reasonably well while keeping the car off boost, and I could lug the motor around at 1800-2000 rpm no problem. However, in cold weather, I had to get a bit into boost (maybe 3 psi) to get reasonable acceleration and the motor wasn't happy being lugged around below 2000 rpm.
The same sort of thing happens with gasoline, but not nearly as much. I'd say gasoline would be more responsive during daily driving down to about 35 F, and then after that, it would start getting less responsive. It feels like E85 starts getting less responsive below about 50F.
My Eclipse on E85 always starts and idles just fine without ever touching the throttle, even when it's below zero. I hope that doesn't change with the Evo 8 ECU I just installed. When I put it in, all I did was disable the immobilizer and it started right up, and it was still pretty chilly outside. After a couple minutes of running it wanted to die though and I noticed it being lean, especially lean for still not being warmed up at all. It turns out that the injector size was set at like 780 or something. I set the injector size(I need it @ less than 500 for my 750's on E85), and changed the MAS scaling to a 2g DSM, and it now idles better than it ever did on the 95 DSM ecu. I'm very much looking forward to retuning it after I fix my broken Fidanza 4.3 6-puck. Hopefully I can beat my 414hp/459 torque with the much better logging capabilities and the ebay tubular o2 housing I'm going to install.
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I've started a small retuning session after having an O2 housing installed and having the exhaust manifold and hotside ported. I've been slowly pushing up the boost about 1 psi and leaning out to around 12.2:1. There is one occasion in my two most recent logs where the ECU registers a few knock counts and the AFR goes momentarily lean. Since E85 knocks less at leaner AFRs, I'm wondering if this is a classic sign of spark blowout or misfire.
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
After fixing several boost leaks and installing a cone filter, I picked up 1 mpg. I'm now up to 17.3 mpg during daily driving that includes a bit of spool time. If highway mileage has gone up 1 mpg too, I might actually be able to make it to Portland (230 miles) on one tank of gas.
what would be a good starting point to tune with rc750cc? i'm doing all the reading i can right now and i was told before i start i should obviously drain the tank and lower the latency values for the injectors? what's a good starting value?
Last edited by ohhgyeahfasho; Oct 16, 2009 at 12:19 AM.
I'm pretty sure it burns slower, it has an octane rating of 105 which would indicate a slower burn..But from the short amount of time I have spent tuning with it, I can tune close to my 116 octane ig. map..The cooling properties go a long way with this stuff..I am running a pretty substantial amount more timing on E85 then I was on pump gas..I have also found that running it richer allows more timing for me, so I am tuned to about 11.3-11.4 now wheras I was hitting knock on the same ign map running ~11.7..Of course your results may vary
Also, make sure you runn all of the gasoline out of your car before tuning, you first two tankfulls are probably only about E65-e70..
Also, make sure you runn all of the gasoline out of your car before tuning, you first two tankfulls are probably only about E65-e70..
MRFRED, I'm assuming that you only adjusted the 4 coolest settings: -25, 0, 18, & 44F. Is this correct? Do you recall the original settings? I'm just curious about how much you increased the enrichment.
Thanks,
Jim
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...l-options.html
The catch is that if you are running a 9417XXXX ROM, the new tables have not yet been defined for your ROM.
Yes, I would probably change values in that temperature range. However, that table is now a bit outdated, please read this thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...l-options.html
The catch is that if you are running a 9417XXXX ROM, the new tables have not yet been defined for your ROM.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...l-options.html
The catch is that if you are running a 9417XXXX ROM, the new tables have not yet been defined for your ROM.
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR



