Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

Best Hi Boost Controller That Helps Prevent Taper(Stock Turbo)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #16  
ROGERV's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by Jim in Tucson
Are you saying when boost is set at 30 it tapers to 24.5psi and when set at 27 it tapers to 23psi? Sorry, but I'm easy confused.

no it tapers to 24.5 at 7k and 23 at 8k on both boost settings. I now only run the 30psi boost setting.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #17  
andrewzaragoza's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 2
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by mrfred
I think you are too used to thinking in terms of MBCs and the cheaper EBCs. The better (more expensive) EBCs allow setting target boost settings at several points across the rpm range. The stock ECU boost control algorithm has the same feature. With this feature, "peak" boost is nearly irrelevant to the boost acheivable at high rpm. With my ECU-based boost control, whether I set the boost to 15 or 27 psi at 4000 rpm, I can still hit 22 psi at 7000 rpm (My boost level at 7000 rpm is relatively anemic because I'm still using the stock BCS and an HFC).
yes i plan to try out the ecu based boost control using gm 3 port to achieve higher boost at high rpm. what do you recommend the usual load based or is it worth it to get a map sensor and do the psi based?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #18  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by andrewzaragoza
yes i plan to try out the ecu based boost control using gm 3 port to achieve higher boost at high rpm. what do you recommend the usual load based or is it worth it to get a map sensor and do the psi based?
I think its more personal preference as to what makes sense. I used to think that strict control over boost was needed to keep from blowing a HG or doing something worse, but its my current philosophy is that what really matters is keeping knock under control and keeping AFR is in a safe range. With that said, I like psi-based control.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #19  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
Are all of you using stock actuators? I have tuned a car with a Green using a Forge 20psi actuator and it will hold 30psi all the way to Redlien using a Profec Type S boost controller.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #20  
andrewzaragoza's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 2
From: DFW, TX
yes still on IX actuator. green should be able to hold more boost up top.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 04:58 PM
  #21  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by mrfred
I think its more personal preference as to what makes sense. I used to think that strict control over boost was needed to keep from blowing a HG or doing something worse, but its my current philosophy is that what really matters is keeping knock under control and keeping AFR is in a safe range. With that said, I like psi-based control.

Knock, knock, knock, did I mention knock? Knock will lift heads and push headgaskets. Its all about cylinder pressure. Sure boost increases it, a little. Sure altering timing can increase torque and raise cylinder pressures, but only a little bit. However detonation pulses really stress those head bolts. I've lifted more heads than I care to mention. In every case the knock sum was over 20, sometimes in the 30's. One time I even had the KS maxed out and that took all but 2 seconds (without timing pull) to lift a seriously cool set of headbolts. I've had many lean spells over the years and that never lifted a head. The same is true of overboosting (without big knock on race gas), never lifted a head.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #22  
nothere's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue. WA
If you are still looking for a ebc that will hold psi and get there in a hurry, I was very pleased in that regard with a turboboost 2. I need the function of boost not coming on strong at low throttle, so I am going to go "McFred/ Tephra" stock.

So I have a very well priced ebc&s fs.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 09:27 AM
  #23  
PeteyTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 10
From: Philadelphia
I hated the profec spec b..It was like the stock turbo was too quick for it and it always had a hard time, the mbc gives me a much better puch on spoolup.. The spec B would also make the car surge if I turned it up to high because of BOV leaking..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Appauldd
ECU Flash
138
Feb 15, 2017 07:05 AM
19fred82
Evo General
16
Jun 14, 2011 06:39 PM
09Ralli
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
15
Feb 18, 2010 02:19 PM
althemean
AEM EMS
22
Apr 28, 2009 02:24 PM
ibarkovic
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
26
Jan 16, 2009 07:03 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 AM.