Correcting an E85 Tune
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, Arizona, USA
This is the only quote I could find so far that includes elevation. Not sure what the direct effect of elevation is, however. Maybe my load is not that far off. I do have the BR intake, but it is supposed to be one of the few intakes that does not mess up MAF readings.
Anyone else care to post their E85 boost, load and elevation? Maybe I'll start a separate thread.
Last edited by Jim in Tucson; May 31, 2010 at 06:30 AM.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ml#post7234999
This is the only quote I could find so far that includes elevation. Not sure what the direct effect of elevation is, however. Maybe my load is not that far off. I do have the BR intake, but it is supposed to be one of the few intakes that does not mess up MAF readings.
Anyone else care to post their E85 boost, load and elevation? Maybe I'll start a separate thread.

This is the only quote I could find so far that includes elevation. Not sure what the direct effect of elevation is, however. Maybe my load is not that far off. I do have the BR intake, but it is supposed to be one of the few intakes that does not mess up MAF readings.
Anyone else care to post their E85 boost, load and elevation? Maybe I'll start a separate thread.

My car is in about 3 million pieces right now. When it is back together, I'll go out and collect a lot with all three load values at once.
d
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Hey all,
I live at 5500ft elevation. running an FP green, 30Psi.
RAW load was about 350 -360 if I remember correctly (was over a year ago) and then realised that my map timing figures (at 340 load) where very different to the actual logged figures in evoscan.
Changed to load + baro + temp and now they are within 1 deg, meaning my logged load and actual are very close (about 10% on the load)
Since going baro + temp compensation I see a load of about 280. which to me makes sense of 2 bar (30psi) plus the atmospheric pressure of 0.83 bar = 2.83 bar absolute = 280 load. I also go into boost at about 85-90% load so that makes me think it true too.
maybe my theory is wrong , but my maps are accurate on my logging.
I generally hit peak load at about 3700 in 2nd, 3300 in 3rd, 3000 in 4th and sub 3000 in 5th and 6th.
dyno peak tq = 3400rpm
running 12.8-13 in spool, dropping to 11.9-12.1 for the rest of the range.
Mike
I live at 5500ft elevation. running an FP green, 30Psi.
RAW load was about 350 -360 if I remember correctly (was over a year ago) and then realised that my map timing figures (at 340 load) where very different to the actual logged figures in evoscan.
Changed to load + baro + temp and now they are within 1 deg, meaning my logged load and actual are very close (about 10% on the load)
Since going baro + temp compensation I see a load of about 280. which to me makes sense of 2 bar (30psi) plus the atmospheric pressure of 0.83 bar = 2.83 bar absolute = 280 load. I also go into boost at about 85-90% load so that makes me think it true too.
maybe my theory is wrong , but my maps are accurate on my logging.
I generally hit peak load at about 3700 in 2nd, 3300 in 3rd, 3000 in 4th and sub 3000 in 5th and 6th.
dyno peak tq = 3400rpm
running 12.8-13 in spool, dropping to 11.9-12.1 for the rest of the range.
Mike
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mitsu.kid.02
Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
217
May 25, 2016 10:47 AM





