Notices
ECU Flash

35r and EvoFlash. Lets see what happens...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 09:08 AM
  #61  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
yeah everyone has said that, and I was disappointed with it because I found an exhaust leak at the O2 housing (the turndown from the turbine to the downpipe on the buschur GT35r)
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #62  
Spooldyou's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
From: Boston,MA
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
I'm using an HKS DLI-II, BPR9ES plugs gapped at .026 Its breaking up bad, if I gapped down to .022 it goes away..

The problem is the coils at that point.. But there are weird issues using a COP setup depending on what you use for a CDI.. I decided to rebuild my setup using an HKS-DLI-II plug and play harness, to a 300m COP setup, and using a Nology 2 channel Igniter between the DLI and COP ..

The reason the it works with the DLI-II is because your boosting the voltage to the coils, but triggering the transistor as it would be stock stock..

FWIW the Nology Igniter is basically a relabeled DSM/chrysler igniter but the wiring harness is easier to get for it (since you can buy it on their site.)


So, let me get this right. your Using the Following in this order

hks dl II --> nology 2 ingniter --> 300m CP

I understand the way you set it up, Still getting alittle confused. Mind explaining alittle more. PM me if you could.


Originally Posted by KOEvo
Interesting thread as i thought AEM was really the only way to go with a tubo upgrade, though i has seen 1 person do the EcuFlash thing with reenforced MAF before this thread. It's good to know so many others are taking this path, and i'm eager to see where it takes us, and how much power will be made.

I had AEM EMS factored into my budget for my setup, but this thread may save me quite a significant amount of money.
I guess there are a good amount of people that are already on the stock ecu making a good amount of power.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:46 AM
  #63  
A418t81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, Al
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
I'm getting about 20psi at about 3800rpm..

I see about 15-17psi at about 3400rpm..

I'm trying to do this from memory because I don't have any of my logs here, but the turbo in daily driving with the 280 cams hasn't been too laggy in my daily driving I really don't notice it.. Once your at around 3000rpm the boost hits pretty fast..
You sure about that? I've seen Buschur post that his kits spool up the fastest he's tested on his dyno but even those were well into the 4k rpm range (4400 IIRC).

My setup produces (all numbers are in 3rd) exactly 1 psi at 3k rpm, about 10-12 at 4k and is all in by 4700-ish. Hard to tell exactly because anything over 4500 becomes warp speed. Cool thing is that below 2k where even the stock turbo is asleep, my car now has significantly more power. I take the exact same route home each day and there's a long, steeply graded hill that I run up in 5th at 40 mph with the AC on. With the stock turbo it would bog and eventually I would have to downshift even w/ the turbo making a couple psi of boost. Now with the 35R, it only requires about 3/4 throttle to perform the same feat in 5th with no downshifting and of course it isn't making any boost.

My car is downright nasty on 22 psi, it was worth every penny and rpm of lag
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #64  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
the only 'real' way to tell boost/RPM is with a map sensor. looking at a boost gauge & tach at the same time can be very deceiving.

I've been debaiting wheather or not to install the 35r kit I have sitting around. After much thought and research I've decided to bite the bullet and just install everything this weekend. Looks like I'll be in the stock ECU/35r catagory after all.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #65  
PessimiStick's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by AlwaysinBoost
the 35r kit I have sitting around.
Wish I was that lucky!! =D
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 12:12 PM
  #66  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
Originally Posted by PessimiStick
Wish I was that lucky!! =D
you can buy it from so I don't install it... I have an add in the classified section.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #67  
EvOcHaRgeR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, AK
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
I'm getting about 20psi at about 3800rpm..

I see about 15-17psi at about 3400rpm..

I'm trying to do this from memory because I don't have any of my logs here, but the turbo in daily driving with the 280 cams hasn't been too laggy in my daily driving I really don't notice it.. Once your at around 3000rpm the boost hits pretty fast..
Dam that's impressive spool up! So your probably full boost by 4000-4200 huh? I seeing 20psi at around 4500-5000rpm or later and I have HKS DLI 2 but with BPR7ES gapped to .20, however I have cam gears set to -2/0. Its probably the tune I have that is causing all the major lag......
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #68  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
I have the boost limited to about 20psi now, but I would think full boost would hit around 4500rpm as most have experienced.. After going back over my logs the levels were about 300rpm later than I originally claimed.. But thats still pretty good compared to what many are experiencing..
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #69  
Jean's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 387
Likes: 1
From: Miami
Im glad to see that the stock ecu can handle 500+ hp. The Gt35 users about how much power have you made at like 15 psi?
I know its a very vauge and open question, i am just curious to get a ball park number nothing exact.
Thanks
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #70  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
at 15psi the turbo really doesnt feel any better than stock.. It feels nice, but the 35r really didnt wake the car up until it was about 19-20psi..

I wish I had numbers to indicate the power levels but most of my work has been while road tuning.

All I can say is 15psi the car felt quick, but alot like stock only slower to spool..
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 04:10 PM
  #71  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
at what point does sucking in the stock honeycomb become a problem?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 07:54 PM
  #72  
fynetune's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
at 15psi the turbo really doesnt feel any better than stock.. It feels nice, but the 35r really didnt wake the car up until it was about 19-20psi..

I wish I had numbers to indicate the power levels but most of my work has been while road tuning.

All I can say is 15psi the car felt quick, but alot like stock only slower to spool..
nice what psi are you at now?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #73  
Jean's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 387
Likes: 1
From: Miami
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
at 15psi the turbo really doesnt feel any better than stock.. It feels nice, but the 35r really didnt wake the car up until it was about 19-20psi..

I wish I had numbers to indicate the power levels but most of my work has been while road tuning.

All I can say is 15psi the car felt quick, but alot like stock only slower to spool..

Thanks i just wanted to get an idea since i want to use the stock ecu with the PT6776R (gt35).
With the ecu Flash and the Evo scan how acurate has it actually allowed you to log and tune at much higher HP #'s and boost?
Did you tune it yourself?

I got an extra 50 or so at the wheels with the ecu flash but that was raising the boost through the stock ecu. Only mods were 3" exhaust and intake.

However thanks for answering my question.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #74  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
I tune my own.. The load calculations are fairly accurate so you can find where in your map you need to modify..

However the built in load calc, Airflow reading, are both clipped well under where we would be getting readings..

I use an ECU+ to do a majority of the logging, I suppliment the data with Evoscan logs to look for Load Site, Knock Sum (correlate with the knock sensor voltage), and other values that are only represented within the ECU itself.

Logging in ECU+ is much better than anything any ECU Logger can give you at the moment, with the exception of Knock Sum and calculating load from some of its data..

I am tuning the car myself, only any hardcore tuning is on hold because I'm working on another project taking most of my time, But I have tuned for 21psi and on pump gas with very conservative timing and very rich, the car is already getting a bit too quick to street tune in third gear.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 07:27 AM
  #75  
Jean's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 387
Likes: 1
From: Miami
Thanks
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.