Notices
ECU Flash

Want to remove/disable your rear O2 sensor without a CEL? Here's how..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2008, 09:24 PM
  #196  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
...

Anyway, thanks for helping and let me know where I should go from here or if this looks right, as far as you can tell.


Thanks,
Eric
I had a quick look at my 96940011 disassembly, and it looks like you got it. Give it a try with my revised code. Should work as intended.
Old Mar 15, 2008, 09:50 PM
  #197  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
I had a quick look at my 96940011 disassembly, and it looks like you got it. Give it a try with my revised code. Should work as intended.
OK, cool. I will clean it up based off of your revised code and flash my ECU within the next week or so, when I can find some time. I get the cat efficiency cel right away, so I will know if this is working or not pretty quickly.


Thanks again,
Eric

Last edited by l2r99gst; Mar 16, 2008 at 08:44 AM.
Old Mar 17, 2008, 06:12 AM
  #198  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
MR Turco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,233
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Mrfred i used your fix for my buddy's car. So far so good. Thanks!
Old Mar 18, 2008, 04:42 PM
  #199  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
Alright so I tried a 10k/.5w resistor as well as a 12k/1w resistor. Neither worked.

I will test 2x100/10W (in parallel AND series) tonight, I suspect it will work fine, just need to find the combo with the least heat output

Cheers
D.
Old Mar 22, 2008, 02:13 PM
  #200  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
phenem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
any updates on this...?
Old Mar 22, 2008, 02:17 PM
  #201  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (34)
 
mitsuboost30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: pa
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
Alright so I tried a 10k/.5w resistor as well as a 12k/1w resistor. Neither worked.

I will test 2x100/10W (in parallel AND series) tonight, I suspect it will work fine, just need to find the combo with the least heat output

Cheers
D.
Post ASAP please im trying to do this with my 9.. and would like a for sure before i attempt!!!
Old Mar 22, 2008, 05:49 PM
  #202  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
OK, cool. I will clean it up based off of your revised code and flash my ECU within the next week or so, when I can find some time. I get the cat efficiency cel right away, so I will know if this is working or not pretty quickly.


Thanks again,
Eric
OK, I patched my 96940011 ROM and flashed it yesterday. I left my CEL on to see if this patch worked, since the ECU will turn off the CEL itself after three cycles of not finding the conditions which caused the CEL.

My CEL was turned off by the ECU today, so I can confirm that the patch for the 96940011 works. I will go ahead and make a separate thread about the 96940011 patch since this thread is already very long and since 96940011 isn't one of the V5 options at this time and doesn't look like it will ever be due to the space restriction.


Eric
Old Mar 22, 2008, 08:48 PM
  #203  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
FullOutPwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Willard, MO 65781
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another happy customer here... worked like a charm. Thanks for the info on this!
Old Mar 23, 2008, 11:46 AM
  #204  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
OK, I patched my 96940011 ROM and flashed it yesterday. I left my CEL on to see if this patch worked, since the ECU will turn off the CEL itself after three cycles of not finding the conditions which caused the CEL.

My CEL was turned off by the ECU today, so I can confirm that the patch for the 96940011 works. I will go ahead and make a separate thread about the 96940011 patch since this thread is already very long and since 96940011 isn't one of the V5 options at this time and doesn't look like it will ever be due to the space restriction.


Eric
Thanks man, much appreciated
Old Mar 23, 2008, 08:29 PM
  #205  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
phenem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
OK, I patched my 96940011 ROM and flashed it yesterday. I left my CEL on to see if this patch worked, since the ECU will turn off the CEL itself after three cycles of not finding the conditions which caused the CEL.

My CEL was turned off by the ECU today, so I can confirm that the patch for the 96940011 works. I will go ahead and make a separate thread about the 96940011 patch since this thread is already very long and since 96940011 isn't one of the V5 options at this time and doesn't look like it will ever be due to the space restriction.


Eric
Eric,

So what you are saying is that if Tephra has a v5 patch for your ROM id use that and set it to disable the rear o2 and you won't need any resistors? I want to remove my rear o2 sensor completely and put my wideband in its place....

Just wanted to clarify before I flashed my car with the v5 update...

~Zach

Last edited by phenem; Mar 23, 2008 at 08:32 PM.
Old Mar 23, 2008, 08:35 PM
  #206  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
A resistor is still required with this setup. Main difference with the new setup is that it will pass ODB-II inspection (and it frees up another ADC input for things like a WB analog out).
Old Mar 23, 2008, 08:43 PM
  #207  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Also for the guys placing their WB in the rear O2 location...pay EXTRA attention to EVERY gasket and seal located between the engine and the WB sensor. One teensy weensy exhaust leak will throw your WB readings off. Its always best to have a bung welded onto the downpipe for the rear O2 to minimize the possibility of leaks.
Old Mar 23, 2008, 10:17 PM
  #208  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
I found the subroutines where the heater circuit is checked. Now I just have to figure out what the heck is happening in those subroutines. Once I figure out what's happening, I can make a software sim to eliminate the heater CEL without having to add a resistor.
Old Mar 24, 2008, 03:51 AM
  #209  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
great news
Old Mar 24, 2008, 05:01 AM
  #210  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
MR Turco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,233
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
I found the subroutines where the heater circuit is checked. Now I just have to figure out what the heck is happening in those subroutines. Once I figure out what's happening, I can make a software sim to eliminate the heater CEL without having to add a resistor.
Very nice!


Quick Reply: Want to remove/disable your rear O2 sensor without a CEL? Here's how..



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:13 PM.