Notices
ECU Flash

Evo anti-lag ECU disassembly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #286  
taavisev's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Estonia
can someone look at the ROM 88840017?
because i´m not that good in IDA yet...


thanx
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 02:34 PM
  #287  
BarryC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Yes there is a table that hasnt been defined yet. BarryC found it for his VIII, but I dont think anyone has started looking for the IX as of yet. I think he found that the value could only be increased on his an additional -5*...from -5 to -10. It may well be maxxed as far what it will allow.
yep John this table will allow ya set the Max ammount of timing retard and that is -10 deg,
this is for the evo 7 and 8

<table name="Timing Retard Limit" category="Timing" address="173f" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint8"/>

evo 9

<table name="Timing Retard Limit" category="Timing" address="133f" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint8"/>

add these tables to evo 7 base or evo 9 base and set the limit to 255
it will allow -10 deg for those that cant get the timing down that low,
makes a big difference to the pops and bangs.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #288  
taavisev's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Estonia
right now i get -10 if i log it. but if i change this valua 203 to 255 what i get then?

sorry dont have my car to test it
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #289  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
203=10
255/203=1.256
1.256x10 would seem to indicate you could max out at -13 if it runs linear.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 11:50 PM
  #290  
al\lupo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Originally Posted by taavisev
can someone look at the ROM 88840017?
because i´m not that good in IDA yet...


thanx
88840017 uses same addresses of 16; tables are not referenced too.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 12:42 AM
  #291  
al\lupo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
203=10
255/203=1.256
1.256x10 would seem to indicate you could max out at -13 if it runs linear.
No, 203 is the decimal view for hex 0xCB, that is a negative number in two's complement. So 0xCB means -53. In the code this value seems to be manipulated adding 0x2A (42), so the minimum timing value should be -11 also if we are logging -10 as lower value. The timing calc routine is complex, moreover this limit *seems* to be in some kind of knock reaction... could someone with more experience in the timing routine check, please?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 05:14 AM
  #292  
taavisev's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Estonia
another question...
is it possible to hold throttle open like 25% with ecu?
then we need rich the AFR and timingi -35 to 40 thats hard anti lag thats how n class evost working now!
is that possible.
i know that TPS is physically connected but maybe idle engine can to the trick!

then we dont need hardware to do it!
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #293  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by al\lupo
No, 203 is the decimal view for hex 0xCB, that is a negative number in two's complement. So 0xCB means -53. In the code this value seems to be manipulated adding 0x2A (42), so the minimum timing value should be -11 also if we are logging -10 as lower value. The timing calc routine is complex, moreover this limit *seems* to be in some kind of knock reaction... could someone with more experience in the timing routine check, please?
Thank you for the correction...I didnt think I understood it 100%...now I do
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #294  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Have you guys found anti-lag tables in the 88590015 ROM?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #295  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Not yet...other than the ones that JCS highlighted in the beginning..I havent had much time to look into it recently but I am trying to get the project back on the road.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #296  
agron25's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: france
Have you guys found anti-lag tables in the evo IX ID88840016 ?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #297  
kkarim's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Florida / Lebanon
agron25: i have them for the 88840017 rom (i have xml and hex) if you're interested.

i'm sure they are pretty much the same as the 016 version.

pm me your email if you want them.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 12:55 AM
  #298  
al\lupo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Originally Posted by agron25
Have you guys found anti-lag tables in the evo IX ID88840016 ?
I have posted them some pages ago in this thread.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 07:06 AM
  #299  
Dan EvoIV's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham
i have jdm evo 8 MR rom+ def with antilag enabled and working if it helps.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #300  
NineWorks's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: South !
Originally Posted by Dan EvoIV
i have jdm evo 8 MR rom+ def with antilag enabled and working if it helps.
I think this can be of some interest... can you post it here ?

Cheers
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:10 PM.