Notices
ECU Flash

Logs attached for new mods -- anyone w/DLL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #1  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Logs attached for new mods -- anyone w/DLL?

I decided to try a couple of new mods today. Didn't touch the tune. I've got three EvoScan v.99 logs, each with one 3rd gear WOT pass on level ground. I'm hoping someone can can plot the HP/TQ curves for comparison purposes. The baseline was done a week ago, but the temps were about the same as today. The run with the test pipe and the run with the test pipe and FMIC were done on the same day and the air temps on the logs look close. It was a little cooler out though when I did the runs with the FMIC, but not dramatically cooler (maybe 5-10 degrees).

Here they are:

BASELINE w/Random cat and stock FMIC

BASELINE w/test pipe and stock FMIC

BASELINE w/test pipe and bigger FMIC

I turned down the boost controller just slightly with the test pipe to keep the peak boost the same (22 psi). I didn't need to touch the boost controller for the FMIC.

Any help would be appreciated. I know that the tune is too lean in places and it needs some work. That's next. For now, I just wanted to see the comparison without touching the tune.

Thanks!
RichJ
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
Tuner@Swift's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Can you repost them with the column headers still in place, preferably in an actual excel spreadsheet (save as .zip)? I don't mind doing it, but I'd lke to do it with minimal work on my part
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #3  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
zipped Excel file attached now

Hopefully, this works. I put them into one spreadsheet as three different tabs. The column headings are in there too.

Thanks!
Attached Files
File Type: zip
EVO8LTW_3_logs.zip (15.8 KB, 17 views)

Last edited by EVO8LTW; Jul 21, 2007 at 06:45 PM. Reason: added file
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #4  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
I thought that spreadsheets.google.com was pretty cool so I had to try it
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #5  
Tuner@Swift's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
What are your mods? Are you still on the stock turbo?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #6  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Originally Posted by mixmastermatt
What are your mods? Are you still on the stock turbo?
For power stuff: HKS 264/272, WR8 turbo, ported manifold/turbine, tubular O2, Buschur turboback, Buschur UICP, Niseil LICP, EBC, Full Race FMIC (added today), 93 oct
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #7  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
your car weigh less than average RS? I would guess about 320 on mustang dyno for log #3 for a typical evo weight
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 07:12 PM
  #8  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
It has a minibattery, 16 lb. wheels, aluminum coilovers and no spare in the trunk. Other than that, it's pretty standard with the bumper beams, full interior, etc.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #9  
Tuner@Swift's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
OK, your graphs were way high for a stock turbo, but look about right for what you have. Here is what I got:

Run 1:

Run 2:

Run 3:
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #10  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Thanks!!! I'm a bit surprised to see the difference in the FMIC, especially up top. I didn't think it would make much difference. I paid very little for it, so I figured it was worth a try, but it appears to be worth it. The test pipe really made a difference in the mid-range.

Hopefully I can run a little more timing with the TP to get better spool-up. I've always felt my car was really laggy for a stock-type turbo. It feels fine in the car, but it just looks laggy on paper.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #11  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
your car weigh less than average RS? I would guess about 320 on mustang dyno for log #3 for a typical evo weight
Good call. My 04 RS weighs significantly less than the 3500 lb (with driver) number that is often used to calculate power. The curb weight stock was 3025 and many simple mods drop it further.

EDIT: mine is just a tad over 3100 with me in it.
EDIT2: corrected curb weight from original press release.

d

Last edited by donour; Jul 21, 2007 at 07:56 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:51 PM.