Notices
ECU Flash

EcuFlash Versions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #1  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
EcuFlash Versions

I noticed it's pretty annoying trying to search for all the different versions for ECUFlash. I am in need of a certain version and it's such a hassle for me to find what I need and I figured why not start a thread on where people are getting their d/l sources from. Can you guys link to where you are getting these versions from?

EcuFlash 1.28/1.29a/1.30/1.31, (obviously 1.33 is found on openecu.org).

I am specifically looking for version 1.31 and/or 1.30 please.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #2  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
why not just use 1.33?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:01 AM
  #3  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
ya I dont get this, why the heck would you want such an older version?
anyone got windows 3.1 links, maybe this guy wants to change his operating system to the old one to.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:30 AM
  #4  
RyuEvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by lemmonhead
ya I dont get this, why the heck would you want such an older version?
anyone got windows 3.1 links, maybe this guy wants to change his operating system to the old one to.
Maybe because he's having the same problem I had along with many others. 1.33 wouldn't work for me and 1.2x does.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:55 AM
  #5  
Asmodeus6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
I just wiped 1.29 off my computer in favor of 1.33.

Or I would have sent it to you. I have to keep my work laptop and home laptop the same versions because of patches and such. My pocket PC autosyncs my tuning folder between the two so I always have the same stuff wherever I am. Makes life easy.

Sorry man. I haven't had problems with the 1.3X+
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:57 AM
  #6  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
I prefer 1.30 myself. I've got 1.33 on my machine, but all of the mods I've made to my ROM are all messed up in 1.33 even after copying the XML over from 1.30.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #7  
logic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 7
From: Berkeley, CA
To the folks using 1.33 and having problems, I'm curious:
  • What exactly doesn't work?
  • What version of Windows are you running?
(I had a few non-trivial "surprises" when I started using EcuFlash on Vista.)
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 09:48 AM
  #8  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
I prefer 1.30 myself. I've got 1.33 on my machine, but all of the mods I've made to my ROM are all messed up in 1.33 even after copying the XML over from 1.30.


Thank you, and for Mr. Wise *** making the comment on Windows 3.1, go back and sit in the corner. Main 'issue' I've been seeing is the greying out of certain fields (ie. 2-byte fields/Init code/Knock sensor 2-8/leanspoolenable and disable)...the coding is copied correctly as per direction for EcuFlash 1.31+, but what's the reason to this?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 10:15 AM
  #9  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
I prefer 1.30 myself. I've got 1.33 on my machine, but all of the mods I've made to my ROM are all messed up in 1.33 even after copying the XML over from 1.30.
Originally Posted by inco9nito99
Thank you, and for Mr. Wise *** making the comment on Windows 3.1, go back and sit in the corner. Main 'issue' I've been seeing is the greying out of certain fields (ie. 2-byte fields/Init code/Knock sensor 2-8/leanspoolenable and disable)...the coding is copied correctly as per direction for EcuFlash 1.31+, but what's the reason to this?
Yeah, 1.31+ doesnt seem to work well for us kids with ROM mods.

Also, even some regular tables wouldnt show up for me in 1.31+.

inco9nito99, i sent you 1.30 again, hopefully you get it this time. If not, Ill host it somewhere for you and others to DL.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #10  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by inco9nito99
I noticed it's pretty annoying trying to search for all the different versions for ECUFlash. I am in need of a certain version and it's such a hassle for me to find what I need and I figured why not start a thread on where people are getting their d/l sources from. Can you guys link to where you are getting these versions from?

EcuFlash 1.28/1.29a/1.30/1.31, (obviously 1.33 is found on openecu.org).

I am specifically looking for version 1.31 and/or 1.30 please.
The change was between 1.30 and 1.31.

1.28-.30 work well with mods and such. 1.31+ FTL
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #11  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
Thanks bud, but I'm not getting anything in my mail box :-/ I got ahold of 1.30, YGPM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 11:09 AM
  #12  
logic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 7
From: Berkeley, CA
Interesting. I'm running tephra's NLTS/etc ROM, plus a bunch of other changes to accomodate the GM BCS, JDM MAP, and boost-targetted BCS/wastegate control. Things are working fine for me with 1.33 (for an interesting definition of "fine", see below).

I'm still curious, are people having these problems with Vista or with XP? Vista made some pretty radical changes to application-specific configuration files, specifically when you "install for everyone" vs. "install just for me". Changes end up getting written to C:\Users\username\AppData\VirtualStore instead of to the proper installation directory for the application, and I've seen a few misbehaving applications (EcuFlash being the biggest offender so far) that will get the writing portion of the change correct, but will still read the originally-installed versions in "C:\Program Files". (So, in my case, editing 96940011.xml ends up saving my changes to the AppData directory in my home directory, but EcuFlash never sees it; I have to manually copy the file over.) There's a good introduction to the permission-based filesystem virtualization that Microsoft added to Vista here, if anyone's curious.

I'm going to try reinstalling EcuFlash at some point with "install only for this user" as my choice instead, to see if that gets rid of this half-baked VirtualStore crap. Note that I never had this issue with 1.33 on XP. (Or on Linux under Wine. I'd kill for a Linux build of EcuFlash, or at least the source code so I could build it myself...)
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 11:12 AM
  #13  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by inco9nito99
Thanks bud, but I'm not getting anything in my mail box :-/ I got ahold of 1.30, YGPM.
Cool, I tried to send again. Didnt work, so I hosted it. Here's the DL link for anyone that needs it.

http://download.yousendit.com/C43B62D40D86FDF1

Also, here is a .xml file (US IX vers. 15) I made that is very organized. It has 2 byte rpm and load, all the MAP sensor tables, lean spool table, plus load based boost section and psi based boost section.

http://download.yousendit.com/C050BC53180E52B0
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #14  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
I'm using 1.30 and all of my ROM mods work fine.

I see no reason to upgrade unless a new feature that I need is presented.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #15  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
Everything works on 1.30 now
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:46 AM.