Ok that is working. What a pita to go through every one. Why is it like this?

 

Wierd. I didn't mean for it to be like that. It doesn't happen that way for me. If I select "beginner", I see what you posted, and if I select "Developer", then I get everything except the stuff I mentioned before.

 

mrfred, did anyone send an updated 96530006? With some of us 05 owners switching it would be nice to have a good xml in the release.

 

at the moment mrfred has only done evo9base.xml... not 7/8

if you want copy mrfreds evo9base into an evo8base.xml and go from there

 

I've got a evo7base.xml file partly done as part of some work I'm doing for an Evo 7 owner. I could post it up this weekend, but it would take too long to make all the individual ROM xml files, so none of the Evo 7/8 stuff would go to Colby until two ECUFlash versions later.

 

If you remove the word "level=" from the table definition the won't grey out.

its level not scaling

 

Here are 88840016 and 17.

mrfred, are you sure about ThrottlePercentage8 scaling? I get some strange values in Open Loop Throttle #1 and #2 (at 6000 RPM I get -13%).

 

Yes, its too bad it looks like that because it is the most accurate scaling. When the throttle is closed, the TPS is at about 13% of its range. For some reason, Mitsu engineers ignore that.

 

BTW, thanks! As soon as I get whatever tephra wants to send off, I'm submitting all these to Colby.

 

Hi mrfred, did you get my email with my Evo 7 xmls? Just wanted to know how they turned out.

MB

 

Hi MB,

Sorry but didn't have a chance to look at any Evo 7/8 stuff for this. Too busy with customer stuff and my own projects. I'll take a look soon.

 

Ok, no problem. Though I can't be 100% certain that there are no errors, they are better then those shipped with previous versions of ECUflash.

I've seen all sorts of maps defined but when you disassemble them you find no evidence of them doing what the definition describes. Take for example static rev limit, its in lots of deff files but the area shown has nothing to do with any rev limit.

Anyhow, if you like, please pass them on to Colby.

MB

 

Finally got around to finishing 88580013 and 88580014.

One comment I have is "turbo boost jdm" perhaps should be called "Turbo Boost TwinBCS" as it's not specific to JDM and JDM ppl might get confusled

otherwise good work everyone

 

ok ... so I starting working on the same project for evo7base + 94170015 before I knew about this thread.

so when I get home I'll read all through this. Hopefully some of the changes I have made won't clash too much with this. Especially with the user level ... I had an idea I'll float. If anyone is interested, I posted the start of my effort to the wiki thread at https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...&postcount=127

I will say, I hope the structure of the base and rom file has been cleaned up. there is a lot of stuff that seems to be going into the rom file that only needs to be defined in the base file. keeping the structure definition in the base file and only the address definitions in the ROM file make for much cleaner definitions that are also easier to trouble shoot.

 

Has there been any resolve with the 1.38 release on this topic ?