Notices
ECU Flash

difference between load based boost control and direct boost control

Old Jan 10, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #1  
daisaw1219's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey/Philly
difference between load based boost control and direct boost control

Hi what are the differences between the two? Is one better then the other. I plan on using the GM 3port and a JDM MAP sensor combo, which would be better for me to use and easier to setup. From what ive read, the direct boost control is set at a target and auto adjust to keep at the target psi but the load based allows for finer adjustments through the RPM range. Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #2  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by daisaw1219
Hi what are the differences between the two? Is one better then the other. I plan on using the GM 3port and a JDM MAP sensor combo, which would be better for me to use and easier to setup. From what ive read, the direct boost control is set at a target and auto adjust to keep at the target psi but the load based allows for finer adjustments through the RPM range. Thanks
Load-based boost control will raise/lower boost to reach a target load, whereas direct boost control will raise/lower boost to reach a target boost level.

The relationship between load and boost changes slightly with weather conditions, so using load-based boost control will result in the boost being a little different depending on weather.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 10:49 AM
  #3  
not2slo128's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Which one would better stop the boost spikes on a quick-spooling turbo?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 01:44 PM
  #4  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 1
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by not2slo128
Which one would better stop the boost spikes on a quick-spooling turbo?
Proper tuning of all the boost tables available would work to lessen the boost spikes with either control method.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #5  
not2slo128's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Which one do you personally prefer/recommend?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 11:09 AM
  #6  
h101171's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Originally Posted by not2slo128
Which one do you personally prefer/recommend?
I prefer the stock load control system, because the power-differences with the boost control systems between winter and sommer is to big. This is the big advantage with the load control . You are having sommer and winter as well the the same power.

Last edited by h101171; Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #7  
not2slo128's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: NYC
if what you say about inter-season stability is true, then shouldn't the ECU raise boost in the summer and lower in the winter to maintain a constant load?

I have found my car to do the opposite using the stock load controlled implementation.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 09:44 PM
  #8  
XR6T's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
The stock ecu doesn't use raw 2byte load to control boost. It uses a different load variable that has corrections for temp and pressure added. In this way during warmer weather the stock boost variable can be up to 20 load less than the raw 2byte, meaning the ecu will add wastgate in an attempt to reach the load targets that have not changed.

At least I think thats how it works.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 07:00 AM
  #9  
NineWorks's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: South !
Originally Posted by XR6T
The stock ecu doesn't use raw 2byte load to control boost. It uses a different load variable that has corrections for temp and pressure added. In this way during warmer weather the stock boost variable can be up to 20 load less than the raw 2byte, meaning the ecu will add wastgate in an attempt to reach the load targets that have not changed.

At least I think thats how it works.
On the EDM ROM versions, I don't think there are any pressure corrections as the ECU is not fitted with any MAP sensor.
As far as I can observe, the boost is load controlled... and it is quite higher during cold winter conditions.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
raulhp
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
8
Feb 10, 2011 05:18 PM
Kami Speed
EvoX 'For Sale' Electronics / Lighting / Audio
9
Feb 20, 2010 03:55 PM
LaXGSR
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
4
Jun 8, 2009 12:50 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:10 AM.