sorry to be off topic but does the 2.6b7 work with lc-1 ? if yes are you using vista?
I got a new tablet and 2.6 been giving me fits with vista and lc-1 and 2.6 b6 and b7

 

add this

GaugeMin="10.0" GaugeMax="17" ChartMin="10.0" ChartMax="17"

to your data.xml in your External WideBand item. Also make sure that the Wideband item is high up on the list.

Evoscan uses the first instance of Guage/Chart min/max to form the righthand axis...

2.6b7 only thou

 

oldevodude - i dont use vista. Also I log the LC1 through analogue ECU input... so I dont need to worry about the BS serial problems

 

I added it and the scaling shows up on the right but the WB line is a vertical line.

My ZT2 displays from 8.0 to 21.0 could that be the issue?

 

picture?

 

 

was 8 seconds long enough to get a signal from the wideband?

just load one of your old logs...

 

I am loading an older log. If set gauge min to anything other than 0 I get a vertical line for the WB

Yes 8 seconds was enough. This was a WOT pull log. I turn on EvoScan a few seconds before I pull, then turn it off. Been doing it this way for a long time.

 

The point of the matter is that my AFR is just the same with Lean Spool on or off. After spool. mid 12s tapering to low 11s

 

Thanks m8

 

Applaud - well normally ppl see a 1pt difference in AFR with LS enabled.

Are you sure your rpm start/stop are still stock?

What version of evoscan?

 

will this code work for all scales if adjusted to suit for each channel ?
can there be multiple y axis's like in logworks?

 

I'm wondering if merely tuning the AFR target table would show benefits with the factory timers. On the Lean Spool AFRMap, is the base AFR values used any where else but in that table?

The factory table leans out all the table values pretty substaintially. I'm wondering if I can just rescale the BaseAFR values to better match my open loop table, then program the target AFR to lean out just the midrange AFRs? The original table looked something like (just rough numbers off the top of my head):
14.7->14.7
13.0->13.0
11.7->13.0
10.7->12.0
10.0->11.0
9.2->10.2

I'd like to do something like this:
14.7->14.7
13.0->13.0
12.5->13.0
12.0->12.5
11.0->11.0
9.2->9.2

Thus the car should lean out about a half point in the spool up areas where the target AFR is leaner then about 11.5:1, but not affect WOT.

 

Yep! I never touched any of the lean spool values.

EvoScan V 2.6b7

If lean spool uses any EGR functions, this may be why I never saw any difference as my EGR is blocked.

 

I see lean spool in action yet my car doesn't have EGR even from the factory.