Installing sensor IN the Cat?
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
postage was a LOT, but I got a tactrix 3 port sent as well.
if I was doing it again you can probably fit the WB into a USPS Small flatrate box, which is 12.95USD...
if I was doing it again you can probably fit the WB into a USPS Small flatrate box, which is 12.95USD...
Otherwise you get creamed.
Last edited by Asmodeus6; Jul 6, 2009 at 02:02 AM.
For me profit from selling stock cat > cost of RTP. The high flow cat was a little more expensive, but its worth it for the environment. Unless you really need to be stock appearing, why wreck something thats perfectly good?
While not ideal, I imagine you will probably be just fine. On the other hand, it isn't very expensive ($30?) or difficult to just weld another bung in the stock exhaust in an ideal location, and won't require a resistor box (guessing you can't turn off the heater check for the X yet)... If it saves you 1 sensor its already worth it, and if your tunes are better its worth even more....
While not ideal, I imagine you will probably be just fine. On the other hand, it isn't very expensive ($30?) or difficult to just weld another bung in the stock exhaust in an ideal location, and won't require a resistor box (guessing you can't turn off the heater check for the X yet)... If it saves you 1 sensor its already worth it, and if your tunes are better its worth even more....
I agree to keep the cat. The Milspec 100 cell is a good way to go.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...available.html
If stock appearance is important you could always weld the stock shielding around the new cat.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...available.html
If stock appearance is important you could always weld the stock shielding around the new cat.
Last edited by chmodlf; Jul 7, 2009 at 06:22 AM.
I have stated before i think there is a large misconception that WBo2 sensors are overly sensitive to heat. My old roommate was running his Uego in his subaru 3" from the turbo with 1700*F EGTs for 30-40k miles. This was with meth and nitro injection. Never had a problem with it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
well that's only 920 degC, which is *just under* their operating temp...
but AFAIK the cat actually produces heat in the way it works - correct me if I am wrong, but I thought when the exhaust is rich/leaner than stoich the cat HEATS up...
So the cat could be higher than EGT's from the engine..
in theory anyways.
but AFAIK the cat actually produces heat in the way it works - correct me if I am wrong, but I thought when the exhaust is rich/leaner than stoich the cat HEATS up...
So the cat could be higher than EGT's from the engine..
in theory anyways.
well that's only 920 degC, which is *just under* their operating temp...
but AFAIK the cat actually produces heat in the way it works - correct me if I am wrong, but I thought when the exhaust is rich/leaner than stoich the cat HEATS up...
So the cat could be higher than EGT's from the engine..
in theory anyways.
but AFAIK the cat actually produces heat in the way it works - correct me if I am wrong, but I thought when the exhaust is rich/leaner than stoich the cat HEATS up...
So the cat could be higher than EGT's from the engine..
in theory anyways.

One thing to add.
I would not put the wideband inside the cat. By the sound of it, the second sensor may be checking for NOx conversion in the front section. Here it would be looking for excess O2 due to the NO being split to N2 and O2. So mounting it here it may read alot leaner than you actually are. Post cat is not so bad because the the extra O2 is mostly used up in the THC and CO conversion. The best option is to just add another O2 sensor bung just before the cat, something any exhaust shop could do for you. It will be far enough away to prevent overheating and close enough to have good response.
Good to hear you got your X :-)
I would not put the wideband inside the cat. By the sound of it, the second sensor may be checking for NOx conversion in the front section. Here it would be looking for excess O2 due to the NO being split to N2 and O2. So mounting it here it may read alot leaner than you actually are. Post cat is not so bad because the the extra O2 is mostly used up in the THC and CO conversion. The best option is to just add another O2 sensor bung just before the cat, something any exhaust shop could do for you. It will be far enough away to prevent overheating and close enough to have good response.
Good to hear you got your X :-)
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
bugger 
so the first couple of logs were fine.
but as soon as I leaned out the map 0.5 AFR my sensor goes funny:

Now the sensor doesn't throw an error - but I found a post by Klaus from Innovate that says a lean condition could mean exhaust too hot... I am assuming the slightly leaner AFR means a higher EGT (anyone comment on this?) thus a higher cat temp...
http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/f...6&postcount=13
I redid the heater cal this morning (sensor out of exhaust) so its definitely not that..

so the first couple of logs were fine.
but as soon as I leaned out the map 0.5 AFR my sensor goes funny:

Now the sensor doesn't throw an error - but I found a post by Klaus from Innovate that says a lean condition could mean exhaust too hot... I am assuming the slightly leaner AFR means a higher EGT (anyone comment on this?) thus a higher cat temp...
Typically an onset of overheat of the sensor will cause steadily leaner readings. This can also be caused by an incorrect heater calibration. During a heater calibration the sensor should be in free air, not mounted in the exhaust. The heater cal schould also be done with a fully charged battery.
Regards,
Klaus
Regards,
Klaus
I redid the heater cal this morning (sensor out of exhaust) so its definitely not that..
Last edited by tephra; Jul 20, 2009 at 07:14 PM.
I think a bigger problem is that cats are not consistent. both due to temperature and age, A new cat might change your reading a lot while an old one is going to change it a lot less as it's efficiency drops off. It sounds very risky to tune even mid-cat In my opinion.
Also,catalyst temps spike when there's lots of fuel and lots of flow, like a turbo car under boost, which is probably why your WBO2 went way lean on you.
Also,catalyst temps spike when there's lots of fuel and lots of flow, like a turbo car under boost, which is probably why your WBO2 went way lean on you.
I'd put the bung in the down pipe.
Right infront of the crossmember is room to stick the sensor on top of the tube. Going to this location, you can point it straight up, preventing condensation from collecting in the sensor. It's also far enough back that the sensor won't overheat.
Other wise, you have to stick it in a horizontal position. This will reduce sensor life. Or you have to put it up on the O2 housing, which will overheat the sensor.
Right infront of the crossmember is room to stick the sensor on top of the tube. Going to this location, you can point it straight up, preventing condensation from collecting in the sensor. It's also far enough back that the sensor won't overheat.
Other wise, you have to stick it in a horizontal position. This will reduce sensor life. Or you have to put it up on the O2 housing, which will overheat the sensor.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
0035427318, 0258006066, 06a906262bc, 25025004, bosch, cat, evo, insidesensors, lc1, lsu42, part, pdf, rear, sensor, walker





