Notices
ECU Flash

Low Load/Cruise Timing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 05:42 AM
  #16  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I cheat.

I use the EGR advance map to do most of the work, but I will set the timing map "bvase" value at 35-38* and add 8* on the EGR map and let it do what it wants.

Couple it with open loop lean cruise or WB feedback determined lean cruise and voila its better than it was. 25-27 is my normal on the big turbo now with large cams. S1s and my 275s still saw 26ish with a Green.
Could you explain this more John? Sorry I'm not too familiar with the EGR advance map.

How for example, would you tune 3000 rpm / 100 load on the road?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 09:10 AM
  #17  
SyZyGy1394's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 3
From: INDIANA FOO!
Originally Posted by nothere
what makes you think you will hit the same cells driving hard as you will driving soft?
You will still scroll through them, and you also have to smooth them in. Don't want any large differences between cells.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #18  
sponners's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: wales
Originally Posted by SyZyGy1394
Are you saying I should just increase it on my main map? I already know how to do that and smooth it in. It just seems to me that more timing advance in the cruise area makes the car less snappy and smooth as it would be with less timing advance. Like right now I have 2 different maps that I will switch for either long distance driving or for more aggressive driving.
you say it doesn't feel a snappy with more timing advance (cruising)

is this because its over advanced (past MBT)........(you will be able to go way past MBT before it knocks)


this is why I started this thread to find if there are any ways of getting mbt at low load other than on a dyno?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #19  
SyZyGy1394's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 3
From: INDIANA FOO!
Originally Posted by sponners
you say it doesn't feel a snappy with more timing advance (cruising)

is this because its over advanced (past MBT)........(you will be able to go way past MBT before it knocks)


this is why I started this thread to find if there are any ways of getting mbt at low load other than on a dyno?
No, I'm saying it doesn't feel as snappy (like when you are cruising at a low load, and then just mash the pedal) because you have a larger value that you have to smooth down more once you get into the higher load cells. Compared to just having the same cells like 8 less degrees of advance.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 04:05 PM
  #20  
nothere's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue. WA
Originally Posted by SyZyGy1394
No, I'm saying it doesn't feel as snappy (like when you are cruising at a low load, and then just mash the pedal) because you have a larger value that you have to smooth down more once you get into the higher load cells. Compared to just having the same cells like 8 less degrees of advance.
this surprises me. the ecu is pretty fast after all.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #21  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by crcain
Could you explain this more John? Sorry I'm not too familiar with the EGR advance map.

How for example, would you tune 3000 rpm / 100 load on the road?


Remember for me 100 is 100kpa more or less. I am tuning in the 60-80 range for highway driving.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 06:44 AM
  #22  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
I like where you are going with this, but what about those of us whom have disabled and removed all of the EGR stuff? The EGR table isn't called.

I assume we can just advance timing in the low cruise range.

As with N/A cars, can we tune to say 15.7 AFR since we are not in boost?

Cruise tuning is the last piece of my "puzzle". I would like to get more than the 22mpg I get now.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 07:11 AM
  #23  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
Originally Posted by JohnBradley


Remember for me 100 is 100kpa more or less. I am tuning in the 60-80 range for highway driving.

What's the reasoning behind adding the additional advance in the EGR map vs doing it in the main map?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #24  
SyZyGy1394's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 3
From: INDIANA FOO!
Originally Posted by Appauldd
I like where you are going with this, but what about those of us whom have disabled and removed all of the EGR stuff? The EGR table isn't called.
This is what I have been wanting to know.

Originally Posted by wreckleford
What's the reasoning behind adding the additional advance in the EGR map vs doing it in the main map?
I don't know, but for me I noticed just having like 30 instead of 40 degrees of timing advance made the car seem more snappy, as if you just mashed the gas all of a sudden while cruising.

I'm curious as to how the EGR map affects timing. Like how fast does it add it in, and under what circumstances does it start to?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 12:12 PM
  #25  
G20's Avatar
G20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 14
From: Orange County, CA
i was thinking 14.7 for the cruising is the best number but noticed you guys mentioned somewhere between 15.x to 16.x. Where're these numbers came from?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #26  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by G20
i was thinking 14.7 for the cruising is the best number but noticed you guys mentioned somewhere between 15.x to 16.x. Where're these numbers came from?
Because for the best fuel economy, you change the 14.7 to 15.1-15.5 during low load/cruise areas. That give you improved fuel economy.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #27  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Adaptability is why I do it this way. Even though the EGR is deleted I left all my subs on so it will work. Since it works based off knock feedback (apparently) I can get a very good idea of what it likes on both gasoline and E85. I said at the outset I cheat and it works really good vs coolant temp this way as well (I have warmup retard disabled) since most other makes actually add timing when cold not take it away.

I have seen depending on the terrain times when the car will run 47* down the road, but if it gets a little hilly depending on throttle input it likes 42* better. I would rather let it float and maintain my 26mpg (some of this is 16:1 cruise) than mess around with a static value and hope it fits all situations
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jgevox
Cobb AccessPORT
1
May 13, 2016 09:55 AM
jameswwt
ECU Flash
2
Aug 18, 2012 09:09 AM
rrkpitt15
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
4
Sep 16, 2011 09:40 AM
211Ratsbud
ECU Flash
48
Mar 12, 2011 12:01 PM
tephra
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
14
Aug 23, 2010 08:27 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 PM.