Low Load/Cruise Timing?
I cheat.
I use the EGR advance map to do most of the work, but I will set the timing map "bvase" value at 35-38* and add 8* on the EGR map and let it do what it wants.
Couple it with open loop lean cruise or WB feedback determined lean cruise and voila its better than it was. 25-27 is my normal on the big turbo now with large cams. S1s and my 275s still saw 26ish with a Green.
I use the EGR advance map to do most of the work, but I will set the timing map "bvase" value at 35-38* and add 8* on the EGR map and let it do what it wants.
Couple it with open loop lean cruise or WB feedback determined lean cruise and voila its better than it was. 25-27 is my normal on the big turbo now with large cams. S1s and my 275s still saw 26ish with a Green.
How for example, would you tune 3000 rpm / 100 load on the road?
Are you saying I should just increase it on my main map? I already know how to do that and smooth it in. It just seems to me that more timing advance in the cruise area makes the car less snappy and smooth as it would be with less timing advance. Like right now I have 2 different maps that I will switch for either long distance driving or for more aggressive driving.
is this because its over advanced (past MBT)........(you will be able to go way past MBT before it knocks)
this is why I started this thread to find if there are any ways of getting mbt at low load other than on a dyno?
you say it doesn't feel a snappy with more timing advance (cruising)
is this because its over advanced (past MBT)........(you will be able to go way past MBT before it knocks)
this is why I started this thread to find if there are any ways of getting mbt at low load other than on a dyno?
is this because its over advanced (past MBT)........(you will be able to go way past MBT before it knocks)
this is why I started this thread to find if there are any ways of getting mbt at low load other than on a dyno?
No, I'm saying it doesn't feel as snappy (like when you are cruising at a low load, and then just mash the pedal) because you have a larger value that you have to smooth down more once you get into the higher load cells. Compared to just having the same cells like 8 less degrees of advance.
I like where you are going with this, but what about those of us whom have disabled and removed all of the EGR stuff? The EGR table isn't called.
I assume we can just advance timing in the low cruise range.
As with N/A cars, can we tune to say 15.7 AFR since we are not in boost?
Cruise tuning is the last piece of my "puzzle". I would like to get more than the 22mpg I get now.
I assume we can just advance timing in the low cruise range.
As with N/A cars, can we tune to say 15.7 AFR since we are not in boost?
Cruise tuning is the last piece of my "puzzle". I would like to get more than the 22mpg I get now.
I'm curious as to how the EGR map affects timing. Like how fast does it add it in, and under what circumstances does it start to?
Because for the best fuel economy, you change the 14.7 to 15.1-15.5 during low load/cruise areas. That give you improved fuel economy.
Adaptability is why I do it this way. Even though the EGR is deleted I left all my subs on so it will work. Since it works based off knock feedback (apparently) I can get a very good idea of what it likes on both gasoline and E85. I said at the outset I cheat and it works really good vs coolant temp this way as well (I have warmup retard disabled) since most other makes actually add timing when cold not take it away.
I have seen depending on the terrain times when the car will run 47* down the road, but if it gets a little hilly depending on throttle input it likes 42* better. I would rather let it float and maintain my 26mpg (some of this is 16:1 cruise) than mess around with a static value and hope it fits all situations
I have seen depending on the terrain times when the car will run 47* down the road, but if it gets a little hilly depending on throttle input it likes 42* better. I would rather let it float and maintain my 26mpg (some of this is 16:1 cruise) than mess around with a static value and hope it fits all situations
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
211Ratsbud
ECU Flash
48
Mar 12, 2011 12:01 PM
tephra
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
14
Aug 23, 2010 08:27 AM












