Notices
ECU Flash

Virtual Dyno - Standalone Software

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 11:57 AM
  #1486  
dawnduran's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
Hum ... Im working on one ...
I Asked before Download.
Sorry.

How can i make a New Car to the List?
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 11:09 PM
  #1487  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
Is it a custom car or a stock cars specs?
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 11:37 PM
  #1488  
dawnduran's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Its a Nissan Pulsar GTiR with custom specs and a Mitsubishi Galant 2.5 V6 NA (160hp)
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 07:58 PM
  #1489  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
you can create custom XML files and put them in the customcars folder in the data folder right now. If I ever get to finish the custom car editor itll save them right to the custom car folder for ya.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 09:05 AM
  #1490  
busky2k's Avatar
Newbie
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Australia
I'm noticing consistently lower results with VD 1.1.9 and no fiddling with the smoothing gets me the same results as 1.1.8. Runs are anywhere from 5 to 10kw lower, however the occasional log is spot on. I know only the smoothing has changed but I want to revert back to 1.1.8 to double check again. Can I grab a copy of the old version?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 10:14 AM
  #1491  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by busky2k
I'm noticing consistently lower results with VD 1.1.9 and no fiddling with the smoothing gets me the same results as 1.1.8. Runs are anywhere from 5 to 10kw lower, however the occasional log is spot on. I know only the smoothing has changed but I want to revert back to 1.1.8 to double check again. Can I grab a copy of the old version?
1.1.9 is more accurate, even though it reads low. Its better to have it accurate, then inflated.

Also, as you know the smoothing changed. If you used 3 in 1.1.8, then you use 2 in 1.1.9.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 07:00 PM
  #1492  
busky2k's Avatar
Newbie
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Yeah not too worried about the absolute numbers but it just seems weird to work with runs that have different power figures from before since I label my CSVs according to their peak power eg "276kw.csv". I used 3 smoothing in v1.1.8 although trying 1 or 2 in v1.1.9 doesn't line up. Either way, just a heads up for those who haven't noticed...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 08:25 PM
  #1493  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
the power calculations havent changed since 1.0.0.1
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 08:34 PM
  #1494  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
the power calculations havent changed since 1.0.0.1
True, but the smoothing algorithm has changed and 1.1.9 did read slightly lower. Regardless, I feel it made the program more accurate.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 08:44 PM
  #1495  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by Boosted Tuning
True, but the smoothing algorithm has changed and 1.1.9 did read slightly lower. Regardless, I feel it made the program more accurate.
I agree
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 05:49 AM
  #1496  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
The smoothing algorithm changed for the side of correctness ... it was just flat wrong before.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 04:30 PM
  #1497  
Tmosser's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 158
Likes: 1
From: CA
Does this work with mitsulogger?

How exactly do you set it up/use? I cant get it to work.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 09:20 PM
  #1498  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by Tmosser
Does this work with mitsulogger?

How exactly do you set it up/use? I cant get it to work.
LOL, actually I dont think it does support mitsulogger. No one really uses it. If you send Brad a mitsulogger log, he could probably impalement it. His email is prob somewhere in this thread.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 05:53 AM
  #1499  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
actually my email isnt in the thread to keep crawlers from finding it. I can PM you my email address if you want. If you want it just PM me and Ill respond.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 08:26 AM
  #1500  
Tmosser's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 158
Likes: 1
From: CA
Well i removed and re installed it. It worked and uploaded a mitsulogger log and it showed my power/tq it just said evoscan on the side of the table brad, if you want to verify it shoot me your email and ill send you a log.

Do you have to have internet connection when uploading a log to vd? I notice when you start up it tests for internet.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:30 PM.