2.4l fueling????
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
2.4l fueling????
So, we just assembled a 2.4 with evo head. Engine runs great with -3.75 on each cam gear. Problem is that is seems to want a ridiculous amount of fuel. I have precision 1200 injectors. Car is also on speed density. The injectors are currently scaled at 780. We dumped fuel everywhere and is not going rich like I would think that it would. The car is currently being broken in so no logs to provide per se. Question is does the 2.4 really move so much more air that it really needs all this fuel? BTW Fuel system is brand new walbro plus external bosch, FPR was tested and good. Good fuel pressure. turbo is 6262
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
It is almost unbelievable. I spent the day trying to chase down a fuel problem that apparently is not there. I thought to myself " there is no way, something most be wrong in my fuel system" Now that I know the fuel system is all good, I guess I will keeping adding fuel and let her rip once she hits 500 miles or so. I wonder what the cfm's look like for this engine compared to a 2.0???
Well before I tell you all it is was the motor moves that much more air, have you checked the pump to make sure its not bypassing or doing anything wierd? Both the NB and WB sensors are known good?
SD will change how everything is setup but if you have a MAPVE and RPMVE table more or less like I am doing these days, scaling for 1200s should be somewhere between 975 and 1044. Headwork and cams?
As far as CFM, there are calculators to give you a rough idea of percentage of increased airflow based on displacement (it wont just be 20%) vs what the head is doing.
SD will change how everything is setup but if you have a MAPVE and RPMVE table more or less like I am doing these days, scaling for 1200s should be somewhere between 975 and 1044. Headwork and cams?
As far as CFM, there are calculators to give you a rough idea of percentage of increased airflow based on displacement (it wont just be 20%) vs what the head is doing.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
Well before I tell you all it is was the motor moves that much more air, have you checked the pump to make sure its not bypassing or doing anything wierd? Both the NB and WB sensors are known good?
SD will change how everything is setup but if you have a MAPVE and RPMVE table more or less like I am doing these days, scaling for 1200s should be somewhere between 975 and 1044. Headwork and cams?
As far as CFM, there are calculators to give you a rough idea of percentage of increased airflow based on displacement (it wont just be 20%) vs what the head is doing.
SD will change how everything is setup but if you have a MAPVE and RPMVE table more or less like I am doing these days, scaling for 1200s should be somewhere between 975 and 1044. Headwork and cams?
As far as CFM, there are calculators to give you a rough idea of percentage of increased airflow based on displacement (it wont just be 20%) vs what the head is doing.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut / Massachusetts U.S.A
Trending Topics
Wow, I hope I will make ruffly that kind of power with my up and coming set up. Will I Mr.Bradley? Mods and what is being done to my car in my sig. I am also going to have 2 maps. One for 93 oct and another for Q16. I am going to be running PTE 1200cc injectors.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SilverEvoX
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
6
Nov 10, 2011 06:12 PM








