Notices
ECU Flash

Speed Density Help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 03:49 PM
  #31  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
BTW I just noticed your playing the Maf scaling instead of smoothing thats not good :P

I think they call the table in your rom maf compensation and its scaling should be in percentage 128.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 04:15 PM
  #32  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
ok so adjust load not kPa but that makes it richer which is the problem. and roadspike i am on 88591715 the ix rom, do u have a 3d rom for that rom??
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 04:27 PM
  #33  
Creamo3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Skylineracer
ok so adjust load not kPa but that makes it richer which is the problem. and roadspike i am on 88591715 the ix rom, do u have a 3d rom for that rom??
Increasing load makes it richer and decreasing leaner. If your STFT are + for a specific area you'll either want to decrease load or decrease RPM VE. If your STFT are - then you'll want to increase those areas. Same thing applies for RPM VE

Have you read this thread on setting it up?:https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ched-roms.html
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #34  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Skylineracer
ok so adjust load not kPa but that makes it richer which is the problem. and roadspike i am on 88591715 the ix rom, do u have a 3d rom for that rom??
Not yet thats coming out soon.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 04:59 PM
  #35  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
Originally Posted by Creamo3
Increasing load makes it richer and decreasing leaner. If your STFT are + for a specific area you'll either want to decrease load or decrease RPM VE. If your STFT are - then you'll want to increase those areas. Same thing applies for RPM VE

Have you read this thread on setting it up?:https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ched-roms.html
yeah i read that i just was unclear about the map vs ve table

Originally Posted by RoadSpike
Not yet thats coming out soon.
well i guess i'll have to wait when it comes out i'll most definitely try it!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 01:18 AM
  #36  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Skylineracer
yeah i read that i just was unclear about the map vs ve table



well i guess i'll have to wait when it comes out i'll most definitely try it!
Sent you an email with the rom if you want to try it. It like the others excepts you have the xmls from the other tephra roms.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 06:58 AM
  #37  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
to no clutter ur sd 2.0 thread i'll ask this here. Which i think from skimming that tread i am right.

i have to change just the scaling for map sensor kPa table (omni4bar to klavico 3.5bar), and that will make the map sensor kPa scaling correct for kPa to load and 3d tables? Then after changing the scaling i should make the map volts side 1:1 with the kPa side for the map sensor kPa table?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 08:57 AM
  #38  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Skylineracer
to no clutter ur sd 2.0 thread i'll ask this here. Which i think from skimming that tread i am right.

i have to change just the scaling for map sensor kPa table (omni4bar to klavico 3.5bar), and that will make the map sensor kPa scaling correct for kPa to load and 3d tables? Then after changing the scaling i should make the map volts side 1:1 with the kPa side for the map sensor kPa table?
Yep thats exactly how it should be done
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 10:37 AM
  #39  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
well did that and it was so rich i could barely drive it out of its parking spot. so should i mess with the left side of the map sensor kPa table
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 10:43 AM
  #40  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Skylineracer
well did that and it was so rich i could barely drive it out of its parking spot. so should i mess with the left side of the map sensor kPa table
Indeed you should thats why its there lol
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 10:48 AM
  #41  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
Originally Posted by RoadSpike
Indeed you should thats why its there lol
don't mock me i am just finally starting to get this

so after i get it close to what the afr it should be then does the fine tunning happen in the 3d table?

also should load be logged in 1byte or 2byte??
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 11:00 AM
  #42  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Skylineracer
don't mock me i am just finally starting to get this

so after i get it close to what the afr it should be then does the fine tunning happen in the 3d table?

also should load be logged in 1byte or 2byte??
Awww what fun is that i can't even mock my test people now

Its a tephra rom so 1byte only I don't think 2byte is setup at all.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 11:04 AM
  #43  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
Originally Posted by RoadSpike
Awww what fun is that i can't even mock my test people now

Its a tephra rom so 1byte only I don't think 2byte is setup at all.
it is when u mess with the mut tables, so should i stick to 1 or 2 byte? if tephra has it as 1 by default i will assume 1
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 11:13 AM
  #44  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Skylineracer
it is when u mess with the mut tables, so should i stick to 1 or 2 byte? if tephra has it as 1 by default i will assume 1
I would have left the mut tables alone and used 1byte to log
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #45  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
Originally Posted by RoadSpike
I would have left the mut tables alone and used 1byte to log
ok then i'll go back to 1 byte
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:35 AM.