Notices
ECU Flash

Load for timing? (evo8)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2011 | 10:59 PM
  #1  
Thoe99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Load for timing? (evo8)

On the EvoX's, there's a separate load for timing and mivec, as well as fuel. Is there a separate load for the Evo8's timing? I'm on rom 94170715.

The reason I ask is because as I'm tuning, the knock-free logs are showing (ie: 5 degrees at 4500rpms, load 270), and when I look that up in the rom timing table, it's actually (ie: 7 degrees) at that data-logged cell. It doesn't show 5 degrees until load 290.

I know I have a boost leak at the throttle body shaft seals, so I'm suspecting this could be throwing me off.
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 06:35 PM
  #2  
Thoe99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
anyone?
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 08:06 PM
  #3  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Most likely its the air temp vs timing comp table pulling timing due to high air temps.
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 08:06 PM
  #4  
widge's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 478
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Its the Timing trims mate,

Air intake temp etc all contribute to what the car is actually going to run, just because its target timing is 7 doesnt mean it will hit it

Whoops must have posted at the same time, but as above lol
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 08:34 PM
  #5  
Thoe99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Thanks for pointing me somewhere. Is it common to modify those tables? I suspect on my rom, it's called "Ignition Trim vs Air Temp"?

Attached Thumbnails Load for timing? (evo8)-ignitiontrim.jpg  
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #6  
Thoe99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
So what I'm seeing is that it's better to tune in the cold (45-68 degrees ideally) and then the other temps will run safer because it auto-retards the tune?

Or...tune it in the hot weather and then overshoot my targets so that in 45-68 degree weather, it will be spot on? (which is what seems to be what I'm having to do)
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 10:07 PM
  #7  
prowakeskater's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
I would tune right now and disregard the retard timing, because no matter what, your values now should have the effect of overshooting when the temps drop.

That way, when you retune in colder temps, you can compare the differences, and set the trims accordingly

Unless someone has a definitive value for the correct amount of trim to set... which im not going to bet on


but dont listen to me, I just started this. Just wanted to contribute some logic
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 10:37 PM
  #8  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Most will lower the "93" and "122" values by 1.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 08:14 AM
  #9  
Thoe99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Thanks, I regularly keep checks on my tune, so I just thought it made no sense for me to artificially overshoot my tunes just to get the timing correct, esp. if I'm in hot and humid Orlando weather year round.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 08:23 AM
  #10  
Thoe99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by prowakeskater
I would tune right now and disregard the retard timing, because no matter what, your values now should have the effect of overshooting when the temps drop.

That way, when you retune in colder temps, you can compare the differences, and set the trims accordingly

Unless someone has a definitive value for the correct amount of trim to set... which im not going to bet on


but dont listen to me, I just started this. Just wanted to contribute some logic
What you said is already happening. I tune during the day, knock-free, and then by nightfall, I start knocking on the same tune. It's very annoying. So I wanna tune these trims back so it works in the same day.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 09:53 PM
  #11  
Thoe99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by Thoe99
Thanks for pointing me somewhere. Is it common to modify those tables? I suspect on my rom, it's called "Ignition Trim vs Air Temp"?

What does the 'Air Temp' in this table refer to? Air intake temp (at manifold)?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 10:16 PM
  #12  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by Thoe99
What does the 'Air Temp' in this table refer to? Air intake temp (at manifold)?
Air intake temp at the MAF, where the sensor is located.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
211Ratsbud
ECU Flash
82
Jan 17, 2022 03:01 AM
redSLed
ECU Flash
7
Jan 9, 2017 05:22 PM
stunt2
ECU Flash
10
Dec 25, 2012 10:27 AM
steven121
ECU Flash
3
Sep 12, 2012 06:46 PM
fuzzychi
ECU Flash
7
Jul 21, 2010 08:56 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:17 AM.