A bunch of load calculation related maps

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 6, 2014 | 01:39 PM

#61

itzwolf

Evolved Member

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 1,193

Likes: 2

From: Florida

Had a little time today so gave the 3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged digging a go. I haven't tried any of these so as always proceed with caution and hopefully tephra wouldn't mind confirming.

Enjoy!

52680024:

Code:

<table name="3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged 0xC78A -> 0xC6DE" category="Misc" address="62a2a" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>

55570006:

Code:

<table name="3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged 0xC79E -> 0xC6F2" category="Misc" address="62c84" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>

56890013:

Code:

<table name="3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged 0xC7CE -> 0xC722" category="Misc" address="63474" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>

58010005:

Code:

<table name="3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged 0xC7D6 -> 0xC72A" category="Misc" address="634b2" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>

59580004:

Code:

<table name="3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged 0xC7DA -> 0xC72E" category="Misc" address="63446" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>

May 21, 2014 | 05:48 PM

#62

RS200Z

Evolving Member

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 150

Likes: 0

From: Singapore

Quote:

Originally Posted by tephra

so i tested the patch tonight, it works perfectly..

as you can see tps changes are still detected below 200 load (about 15 psi in this graphic)

but above that nothing

(this is with 1 and 1 in the tps increase/decrease fields)

David, I have been testing the TPS Liftoff to Baro patch for the past couple of days. I uses 180 for my TPS Liftoff Max Load. I noticed that when the patch is enabled, during light load, highway cruising the AFR goes lean at times and the car felt pulled back. When the patch is disabled, all seems well again.
Are you experiencing this as well?

May 21, 2014 | 08:42 PM

#63

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 67

From: Melbourne, Australia

can you send me the 2 ROM's? I havn't had any problems with my setup...

May 22, 2014 | 08:08 PM

#64

RS200Z

Evolving Member

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 150

Likes: 0

From: Singapore

Quote:

Originally Posted by tephra

can you send me the 2 ROM's? I havn't had any problems with my setup...

PM sent!

Jun 3, 2014 | 07:37 AM

#65

xFonts

Newbie

Joined: Aug 2013

Posts: 17

Likes: 0

From: Plymouth, MN

Would the 3xMAP current readout patch be better with get scaling right or would it be too touchy?

Also for the TPS LiftOff patch have weird effects if you put anything above 0.4% in the Load Multplier End table?

Jul 23, 2014 | 01:52 AM

#66

BerserkerX

Evolving Member

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 271

Likes: 0

From: Utah

Have these been defined for 59590004 or not yet?

Jul 23, 2014 | 04:12 AM

#67

Drkramm

Newbie

Joined: Oct 2012

Posts: 64

Likes: 0

From: pa

Anyone got 56890009 ?

Feb 8, 2015 | 11:29 AM

#68

chetrickerman

Evolved Member

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 575

Likes: 1

From: Colorado Springs

Quote:

Originally Posted by itzwolf

55570006:

Code:

<table name="3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged 0xC79E -> 0xC6F2" category="Misc" address="62c84" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>

In this one, are you sure its 0xC6F2?

I am getting 0xC6F4

May 23, 2015 | 07:07 AM

#69

chetrickerman

Evolved Member

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 575

Likes: 1

From: Colorado Springs

Quote:

Originally Posted by itzwolf

55570006:

Code:

<table name="3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged 0xC79E -> 0xC6F2" category="Misc" address="62c84" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>

In this one, are you sure its 0xC6F2?

I am getting 0xC6F4

Tephra, can you confirm?

Mar 1, 2019 | 01:10 PM

#70

sleandro

Newbie

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 20

Likes: 1

From: curitiba, pr, brazil

Yeah, I'm 4 years late...

Can anyone please help me find the tables bellow in my 56950008 with tephramod v3?

ECT Compensation for Load
MAF IAT Compensation for Load
Baro Compensation for Load
Load multiplier when TPS increased by %
Load multiplier end when TPS decreased by % (hysteresis)
Load multiplier when TPS Increasing - MAP High Load Multi
Load multiplier when TPS steady - MAF/MAP Low Load Multi
Load multiplier - TPS steady Decay Rate
Load Increase/Decrease threshold" category="Load" address="53ca6" type="1D" scaling="Loadify_x50"/>
Load Increase/Decrease divider (ie 1 is biggest)" category="Load" address="530e8" type="1D" scaling="uint16"/>
Load Increase/Decrease multiplier (ie 1 is smallest) #1" category="Load" address="530e4" type="1D" scaling="uint16"/>
Load Increase/Decrease multiplier (ie 1 is smallest) #2" category="Load" address="530e6" type="1D" scaling="uint16"/>
Load RampUP Rate
Load RampDOWN Rate
Load Ramp Rate #1 (Load > 75)
Load Ramp Rate #2
Load Ramp Rate #3
Load Ramp Rate #4

TPS Liftoff Baro to Load patch #1
TPS Liftoff Baro to Load patch #2
TPS Liftoff Max Load patch

3xMAP tables use actual MAP, not averaged