Who is running or ran the SD-only patch?
I currently have it on 2 cars, Brent and Alpha X. Seems to work pretty flawless other than having to leave the MAF plugged in. Not the end of the world but it would be cleaner if it could go away. Hid it out of the airstream for the time being.
I remember reading that Tephra said that the ECU seems to use the lower of the MAF vs MAP values. He said you could just put in really high MAF values then it would default to the MAP values. Did you do that or something else?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
ok, so its not the widespread adoption that I was guessing. I sure like the idea of not having to mess with two air metering systems, so I'm still curious about trying it out.
I have mine set-up like Murlo, MAP only after 110 load.
The only downside is that it dumps fuel like crazy when you lift over 110 load. This is because load decays much slower with MAP than MAF.
The only downside is that it dumps fuel like crazy when you lift over 110 load. This is because load decays much slower with MAP than MAF.
I run my car in SD, have done for ages.
I tried aligning the MAP and MAF very closely aswell for a while. it really didn't run any better for all the effort it took! I just wanted to see if it helped with SST stuff.
but all the cars i tune, i do the same as some of the other guys - run the MAF up until the 100-140ish load area and then MAP from there.
Once on boost i'm always running MAP though.
I tried aligning the MAP and MAF very closely aswell for a while. it really didn't run any better for all the effort it took! I just wanted to see if it helped with SST stuff.
but all the cars i tune, i do the same as some of the other guys - run the MAF up until the 100-140ish load area and then MAP from there.
Once on boost i'm always running MAP though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







