Tephra Rom ignoring "Closed-Loop, Min Coolant Temp"?
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA
Tephra Rom ignoring "Closed-Loop, Min Coolant Temp"?
Hey guys,
I seem to have a problem in my Tephra Rom that causes it to ignore this parameter.
It doesn't seem to matter what the value is.
I know it's not working because if I use the Open-Loop load and throttle thresholds instead, I can force open-loop at startup.
Rom=88590715
Address=14aa
Scaling:
Name=Temp
Format=%.0f
units=Fahrenheit
(9/5)*(x-40)+32
(5/9)*(x-32)+40
Data Type=uint16
Any ideas?
I seem to have a problem in my Tephra Rom that causes it to ignore this parameter.
It doesn't seem to matter what the value is.
I know it's not working because if I use the Open-Loop load and throttle thresholds instead, I can force open-loop at startup.
Rom=88590715
Address=14aa
Scaling:
Name=Temp
Format=%.0f
units=Fahrenheit
(9/5)*(x-40)+32
(5/9)*(x-32)+40
Data Type=uint16
Any ideas?
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA
what sort of value were you thinking of using?
20*C to 35*C is the optimum range for this parameter.
Higher and you can run needlessly rich, lower and you start screwing with your fuel trim learned value (needlessly).
Note also there is a Post-Startup Closed-Loop Delay table (or two) that factors into the closed loop function.
20*C to 35*C is the optimum range for this parameter.
Higher and you can run needlessly rich, lower and you start screwing with your fuel trim learned value (needlessly).
Note also there is a Post-Startup Closed-Loop Delay table (or two) that factors into the closed loop function.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA
what sort of value were you thinking of using?
20*C to 35*C is the optimum range for this parameter.
Higher and you can run needlessly rich, lower and you start screwing with your fuel trim learned value (needlessly).
Note also there is a Post-Startup Closed-Loop Delay table (or two) that factors into the closed loop function.
20*C to 35*C is the optimum range for this parameter.
Higher and you can run needlessly rich, lower and you start screwing with your fuel trim learned value (needlessly).
Note also there is a Post-Startup Closed-Loop Delay table (or two) that factors into the closed loop function.
Car starts and runs fine for the first 20 secs and then starts leaning out anytime the Coolant temp is below 60f... once coolant temps rise the car runs perfect. .. literally a 2 to 3 minute inconvenience in my daily commute. not that big of a deal really.
Could you provide the defs for the two tables you mention?
Last edited by tsitalon1; Sep 16, 2014 at 09:31 AM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA
Just to clarify, are you talking about the Post-Cranking IPW Enrichment Adder tables?
I'm on 93 currently but the Kelford' s seem to cause an unstable idle when cold.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA



