AMS tests the New Forced Performance HTA37R!
Apr 10, 2008, 08:33 AM
#17
Did AMS put out a dyno graph like this for the HTA 35R?
Was it like this test with only thing changing being the turbo?
Would be nice to get a bit more info about the test like AFR, boost pressure, and intake air temp.
Was it like this test with only thing changing being the turbo?
Would be nice to get a bit more info about the test like AFR, boost pressure, and intake air temp.
Apr 10, 2008, 08:34 AM
#18
Apr 10, 2008, 08:35 AM
#20
I think 9sec9 was referring to the area from 5-6k, where the HTA is behind the normal 37r. But, I think that can be contributed to boost control at that point in time. That's why he was asking about boost plots for both runs.
Edit: He beat me to it...posted while I was making this post.
Edit: He beat me to it...posted while I was making this post.
Guys this is not our turbo and boost was kept the same through both runs.
When Martin and Chris get some free time they will drop in here and post up there thoughts.
Eric
Apr 10, 2008, 08:35 AM
#21
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 900 pounds lighter than a X.
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was this HTA 37 r on the FP-turbine housing??? I spoke with Robert he had said that the Garrett .82 3 inch T-3outlet's were not available yet.
Last edited by U2SLO; Apr 10, 2008 at 08:50 AM.
Apr 10, 2008, 08:38 AM
#24
I agree. Yes I think the HTA 35r is a better turbo to a normal 35r, but it's not so significant to warrant all the excitement.
People have conflated Buschur's awesome results lately with the HTA. Trust me Buschur would still be making sick power without the HTA. And spool on an HTA if you read Buschur's posts on what spool is, you'd realize it is not night and day difference. I didn't feel the difference when swapping.
+1 on this question.
People have conflated Buschur's awesome results lately with the HTA. Trust me Buschur would still be making sick power without the HTA. And spool on an HTA if you read Buschur's posts on what spool is, you'd realize it is not night and day difference. I didn't feel the difference when swapping.
+1 on this question.
Apr 10, 2008, 08:50 AM
#26
Eric, I don't think anyone would gripe about making more power, especially if it's with basically the same turbo. I would take the HTA over the standard any day, with those results. My only question was for fact finding. When I say spoolup, I usually talk in terms of EVERYTHING it takes to modify the results. Usually boost is the most significant, but timing, AFR etc have an effect too. Not preaching to the choir, just wondering what the parameters were.
Apr 10, 2008, 08:55 AM
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Thornton CO
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless the test car posts some significant results after playing around with the set up, I don't see why anyone would pay the extra money for the HTA over the standard 37R. Guess the HTA isnt the savior of all things turbo afterall, just some applications
Apr 10, 2008, 09:03 AM
#30
One thing has to be kept in mind. THIS IS NOT A REFLECTION, I REPEAT, NOT A REFLECTION IN ANY WAY on ANY VENDOR....PERIOD. This AMS 37R test and previous tests on the HTA35R were by different tuners using different methods and parameters to achieve their results. This HAS to be considered when trying to arrive at final POTENTIAL whp levels of this turbo. Most tuners could arrive at higher numbers if they chose to, but as Eric said, this test was for as close as possible to the same parameters, 37R to HTA37R. Just thought that was worth saying at this point. Your results may vary.