AMS tests the New Forced Performance HTA37R!
My hopes were that this turbo would make more than a 67p trim t3.. I made 735whp on my 67p trim and all the way to redline it held power compared to how this runs out of breath up top.. im going to go back and compare spool, even though my motor is a 2.0L not a 2.3L..
Mike, isn't the 2.0 vs the 2.3 a major factor when comparing the 'running' out of breath issue? The 2.3 just doesn't spin like the 2.0 up top. I know you know that, but since I haven't had the 2.3, I'm asking as much as stateing a point.
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
We are going to do another test in the next couple of weeks on Martins personal car. with a 37R to HTA37R comparison. Martins car is also set to read back pressure and we can do extensive logging so you guys and see where the numbers are coming from 
This test was something we had the opportunity to do while the car was here. The real reason its here is to get our drag plenum VSR, some better cams and make some more power... I will post those results when we get them as well
Eric

This test was something we had the opportunity to do while the car was here. The real reason its here is to get our drag plenum VSR, some better cams and make some more power... I will post those results when we get them as well

Eric
Eric, if this type of test had not been done, there would have been posts wondering why you 'changed' the settings, boost, timing, AFR's, etc. This was a great comparo for the first test results. Good job.
Yeah i realize the 2.3 doesnt spin up as high but i just want to see how broad the powerband is compared to my 67p graph.. even with the 2.3 not spinning as high it spools sooner so the powerband should be close..
I bet if you were to do two runs back to back with the same turbo, you will find very similar inconstancies.
Like I had posted in my initial post. If you have an AMS 37R now I dont know if it would be worth the gain but when shopping for a larger turbo from a smaller one. An extra 20 whp for $500 is pretty damn good HP to Dollar ratio. Hell I would take that all day long LOL
Eric
Eric
If I were in the market for 700+hp there is not question, I'd pick the HTA based on the results from this test. . .
Spot on! How many people complained about the cost of an EVO Green only to gain 20-40whp. Now there are hundreds of them out there! And that is $1000-$1500 for 20-40whp.
If I were in the market for 700+hp there is not question, I'd pick the HTA based on the results from this test. . .
If I were in the market for 700+hp there is not question, I'd pick the HTA based on the results from this test. . .
Spot on! How many people complained about the cost of an EVO Green only to gain 20-40whp. Now there are hundreds of them out there! And that is $1000-$1500 for 20-40whp.
If I were in the market for 700+hp there is not question, I'd pick the HTA based on the results from this test. . .
If I were in the market for 700+hp there is not question, I'd pick the HTA based on the results from this test. . .
i think there is a misconception about the HTA's. seems to me they def make more usable power but the spool is a tad slower. i mean as to be expected because it flows more air, but thats the whole talk about these HTA's.
Maybe the 37r. DB's initial test results with the HTA35r .82 showed that it picked up a lot more power in the mid range while showing minimal power gains up top over the normal 35r.


