Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

5XXwhp+ member of the E85 Army...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #31  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
e85 needs to be run leaner. 14s for cruise is too rich. spark plug will be way too cold heat range. Brad Brooks running e85 and runs18/1 at cruise with no miss fire and 93oct like gas mileage. this is the reason for your slight miss fires.
I'm actually leaning towards his DLI and/or wiring.

I've run my personal evo at 17afr cruise and also normal stoich and no misfires either way. Of course the 17 afr gets better mileage.

10+ other evos tuned on E85 at normal stoich cruise with no misfires.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #32  
Wicked E's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Question...

Do you recommend the APS twin vent BOV after experiencing it on this vehicle?

-E
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 09:06 PM
  #33  
keepwishing03's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: boise,id
nice numbers
Reply
Old May 30, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #34  
dsevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 971
Likes: 1
From: Kailua, HI
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
85% IDC at 7960rpm @32psi boost via Evoscan, stock fuel pressure.

The FIC 1450's are great injectors. Flow 15XXcc and work on 91 pump gas just fine. Very impressed with these, and that is coming from a person that was less than impressed on other FIC offerings.
Will the FIC 1450's tune as well as the RC 1000's on 91? I was told to get RC1 1000's since I'm keeping the stock computer and they're easy to tune, but you've had some nice results on the 1450's, and I'm worried the 1000's are too small for my 2.2L HTA82 setup. I'm in so cal, but I'm seriously considering taking a road trip to the bay area.

Also, is your dyno low reading like most MD's? If so those are some awesome #'s given its a cast manifold and .63 housing. Either way impressive #'s.

Last edited by dsevo; May 30, 2009 at 11:03 AM.
Reply
Old May 30, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #35  
9sectalon's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Nice setup !
Reply
Old May 30, 2009 | 11:06 PM
  #36  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by dsevo
Will the FIC 1450's tune as well as the RC 1000's on 91? I was told to get RC1 1000's since I'm keeping the stock computer and they're easy to tune, but you've had some nice results on the 1450's, and I'm worried the 1000's are too small for my 2.2L HTA82 setup. I'm in so cal, but I'm seriously considering taking a road trip to the bay area.

Also, is your dyno low reading like most MD's? If so those are some awesome #'s given its a cast manifold and .63 housing. Either way impressive #'s.
The RC1k's run like stock injectors. The FIC's are a bit harder to tune but they can run pretty good.

Our mustang is a normal reading mustang. I believe this car would hit 600 with a larger housing and no other changes.
Reply
Old May 31, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #37  
SickSilverNLow's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 0
From: OREGON
awesome numbers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GST Motorsports
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
61
May 20, 2012 06:34 PM
L888Apex
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
4
Jan 18, 2010 07:22 PM
GST Motorsports
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
18
Nov 9, 2009 08:00 PM
GST Motorsports
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
29
Mar 14, 2009 09:58 AM
razorlab
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
32
Nov 8, 2008 08:57 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:38 PM.