Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Interesting Flow Bench Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #1  
evorace's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Interesting Flow Bench Results

I came across this post and thought I would share it.

Flow Bench Results for Various Evolution Intake Manifolds
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 08:27 AM
  #2  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Wow, I thought it had been quiet around here

So Mike@AWD, DynoFlash, and Dave Buschur have all tested the V2 versus a run of the mill Buschur ported and found there was no difference? YIKES
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 09:12 AM
  #3  
dsm25psi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte,NC
Originally Posted by crcain
So Mike@AWD, DynoFlash, and Dave Buschur have all tested the V2 versus a run of the mill Buschur ported and found there was no difference? YIKES
wow
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 11:07 AM
  #4  
evorace's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
I think what the test shows more than anything is that flow benches are more or less useless information when it comes to dealing with flow compounded by pressure.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 08:04 AM
  #5  
twkdcd595's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Very interesting, although I dont know if I would go so far as to say flow benchs are providing useless information... it did not see to say much here though huh.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 11:48 AM
  #6  
Cyloc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Area
DB already posted it on here
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #7  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
evorace, unfortunately I have to agree with you. The flow bench hasn't shown me much other than maybe the total CFM looks to make more power at high RPM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #8  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
I tested the v2 vs standard buschur ported except it was 1 day to the next and it made 712whp w/ Buschur Ported and 711.9whp with v2.. I asked dave if he had ever seen a car not gain power and he said he had not tested it against his stocker ever,.,. I told him he should try it but he said he didnt think the ported stocker could keep up.. I never went back to the ported and stayed on the wilson since i paid for it and it was on the car and didnt seem to hurt anything..
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 12:23 PM
  #9  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
evorace, unfortunately I have to agree with you. The flow bench hasn't shown me much other than maybe the total CFM looks to make more power at high RPM.
also helps to balance the runners as well correct??
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 12:51 PM
  #10  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Yes, Mike is telling you guys the facts. I didn't believe him or Al when they told me the results they found. Big mistake on my part.

No, Mike, balancing the runners appears to have hurt the performance of the intake actually. The one with the worst balance had the best performance from low end to 8,000 rpm.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #11  
Cyloc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Area
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Yes, Mike is telling you guys the facts. I didn't believe him or Al when they told me the results they found. Big mistake on my part.

No, Mike, balancing the runners appears to have hurt the performance of the intake actually. The one with the worst balance had the best performance from low end to 8,000 rpm.
It seems that is almost a good idea to just clean up the casting on the inside of the manifold and port match it. I guess mitsu did not do that bad of a job on the design of the manifold.

Dave....What do you think about having the fins in the plemun, between the runners, cut down? Does making the runners shorter, and the plenum larger really make a large difference?

Last edited by Cyloc; Feb 16, 2009 at 01:01 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #12  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Cutting the dividers down will increase flow on SOME of the runners in the stock manifold but not all of them. In order to increase flow on the #1 runner you have to do some welding on the intake manifold itself. When you are all done with it and you dyno it against the stock intake that is just port matched nicely on both ends and cleaned up the stock one beats all your hard work anyway.

The V2 has the runners cut down to 6.5 inches and the one we cut down went down to about 9". The one we cut down also had the best balance from runner to runner. Both of them got whooped by the stock one with just mild porting done to it.

It's going to be difficult for us to make an intake to outperform the stock one, maybe impossible.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EVOII
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
4
Jun 7, 2016 06:33 AM
speedypeat
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
13
Apr 19, 2010 08:15 AM
HeadGames
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
21
Sep 29, 2009 02:40 PM
HPF Kyle
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
16
Jan 19, 2007 06:00 PM
xspsi4
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
46
Jan 3, 2007 11:45 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:38 AM.