Ceazar's 465whp Evo 8!
Ceazar's 465whp Evo 8!
Ceazar and I have been talking a few months over the phone on a specific setup I thought would make this car fast yet have good street manners. Well Today we got the car all tuned and ready to go with 465whp/400wtq on 93 Octane. We are utilizing an aem ems for engine management combined with a custom turbo kit sporting an hta35r and full race tubular exhaust manifold.

Evo 8 Mods:
Hta35r w/ full race manifold
precision 1,000 c.c Injectors
Aem Ems
Cosworth Cams
Arp Head Studs
Buschur Ported Intake Manifold
Buschur Ported Throttle Body
Full TBE
4" IC w/ Piping
Custom Intake
Stock Bottom End
26/27psi 93 Octane
Dyno Sheet: (1.2 CF)

26/27psi 93 Octane
Car runs smooth as silk! Ceazar will be picking up his car Tomorrow, he is in for a treat since his last setup was with the stock evo 8 turbo...This should put a smile on his face from ear to ear!

Evo 8 Mods:
Hta35r w/ full race manifold
precision 1,000 c.c Injectors
Aem Ems
Cosworth Cams
Arp Head Studs
Buschur Ported Intake Manifold
Buschur Ported Throttle Body
Full TBE
4" IC w/ Piping
Custom Intake
Stock Bottom End
26/27psi 93 Octane
Dyno Sheet: (1.2 CF)

26/27psi 93 Octane
Car runs smooth as silk! Ceazar will be picking up his car Tomorrow, he is in for a treat since his last setup was with the stock evo 8 turbo...This should put a smile on his face from ear to ear!
I would expect a bit more from that turbo at that boost pressure especially with the intake manifold and throttle body. Maybe closer to 500 on 1.2?
When I had my 3065 63ar on the stock bottom end, stock im, stock tb on AEM the car was making 372awhp on same brand dyno at 25psi. with an HTA and 1-2psi more plus the intake mods I would expect closer to 400 if not more on 1.0cf. Maybe the mivec? I don't know...
In any event the car should be crazy fast especially compared to the stock turbo. Enjoy!!!
When I had my 3065 63ar on the stock bottom end, stock im, stock tb on AEM the car was making 372awhp on same brand dyno at 25psi. with an HTA and 1-2psi more plus the intake mods I would expect closer to 400 if not more on 1.0cf. Maybe the mivec? I don't know...
In any event the car should be crazy fast especially compared to the stock turbo. Enjoy!!!
Trending Topics
I would expect a bit more from that turbo at that boost pressure especially with the intake manifold and throttle body. Maybe closer to 500 on 1.2?
When I had my 3065 63ar on the stock bottom end, stock im, stock tb on AEM the car was making 372awhp on same brand dyno at 25psi. with an HTA and 1-2psi more plus the intake mods I would expect closer to 400 if not more on 1.0cf. Maybe the mivec? I don't know...
In any event the car should be crazy fast especially compared to the stock turbo. Enjoy!!!
When I had my 3065 63ar on the stock bottom end, stock im, stock tb on AEM the car was making 372awhp on same brand dyno at 25psi. with an HTA and 1-2psi more plus the intake mods I would expect closer to 400 if not more on 1.0cf. Maybe the mivec? I don't know...
In any event the car should be crazy fast especially compared to the stock turbo. Enjoy!!!
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: South Beach, FL / Miami, FL / Pt. St. Lucie, FL / NYC
I would expect a bit more from that turbo at that boost pressure especially with the intake manifold and throttle body. Maybe closer to 500 on 1.2?
When I had my 3065 63ar on the stock bottom end, stock im, stock tb on AEM the car was making 372awhp on same brand dyno at 25psi. with an HTA and 1-2psi more plus the intake mods I would expect closer to 400 if not more on 1.0cf. Maybe the mivec? I don't know...
In any event the car should be crazy fast especially compared to the stock turbo. Enjoy!!!
When I had my 3065 63ar on the stock bottom end, stock im, stock tb on AEM the car was making 372awhp on same brand dyno at 25psi. with an HTA and 1-2psi more plus the intake mods I would expect closer to 400 if not more on 1.0cf. Maybe the mivec? I don't know...
In any event the car should be crazy fast especially compared to the stock turbo. Enjoy!!!
Hello
How shoud I understand the 465whp/400wtq? The power is on the wheel which is on the crank is about 20% more ? Or it is calculated on crank ?
In Europe on dynodynamics show crank power..
How shoud I understand the 465whp/400wtq? The power is on the wheel which is on the crank is about 20% more ? Or it is calculated on crank ?
In Europe on dynodynamics show crank power..
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: South Beach, FL / Miami, FL / Pt. St. Lucie, FL / NYC
crank hp is actually higher then wheel hp. 465/400 was done at a 1.2 CF which is very close to dynojet #'s
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: South Beach, FL / Miami, FL / Pt. St. Lucie, FL / NYC



