Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

FP Black Q16 635hp/640tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #76  
RockmanX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 4
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by tscompusa
one or the other, more so the moroso ams pan im sure.


what about the pan you found on the website HPF. would that be better then the ams pan also on that site they stated they are willing to custom make a pan if needed as well.

Last edited by RockmanX; Nov 3, 2009 at 09:22 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 09:29 AM
  #77  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by RockmanX
what about the pan you found on the website HPF. would that be better then the ams pan also on that site they stated they are willing to custom make a pan if needed as well.
Im not sure, because MOROSO made the ams pan.. so they will probably just say get the ams pan.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 09:38 AM
  #78  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance
Well, if you are pulling that hard, you are getting some air if you run a stock oil pickup and pan. And I dont think you would see the pressure drop and flutter on a mech gauge, especially an expensive liquid filled one since the mechanical damping is pretty great. A high sampling rate electric sensor however shows it very clearly.
No I am sure you wouldnt see this on a mechanical gauge. And looked at your log closer the oil pressure is dipping from 90psi to ~60psi but only for a few micro seconds. it dips to 50psi for maybe two micro seconds. I am just not seeing were this is a problem really. I dont think any bearing anywhere would be affected by these small dips of pressure.

Moving the pickup to rear is not a good idea. Thats just gonna move the problem to hard breaking instead of high deceleration. In factory form the car is far more likley to decelerate hard to 1g than it would be to accelerate to .7g so that is likely why the placement is where it is. Plus I dont see an accumulator even helping. Its just a mechanical device like a spring loaded plate. If a mechanical gauge doesnt show the pressure loss neither is an accumulator.

dry starting is far more damaging to engine bearings. when an engine first starts there is no oil pressure for as much as 2-4 seconds, especially bad after an oil change.

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Nov 3, 2009 at 09:49 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 09:44 AM
  #79  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
The pressure drop on the graph is in seconds, not micro seconds.

Your thought process on the g's and effect on oil pressure don't match mine. First off I don't hit the brakes hard enough to see 1g very often, that's a panic stop. I do however flog the hell out of the car quit often. Also, during a hard launch the engine is at high RPM or climbing in RPM, during hard braking more than likely the clutch is in at the engine rpm is close to idle, you could have 2 psi of oil pressure at that point and it would hurt nothing.

I'll give you an example. When I was building Shepherd's engines he was having a lot of rod bearing problems. We figured out that he was decelerating on the engine and pulling the chute, so 11,000 rpm, huge negative G's and 0 oil pressure. The problem was fixed by simply throwing the clutch in.

Moving the pick up the back with some baffling is in fact a huge step in fixing the problem.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #80  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
9sec9, would you post the datalog from page one with the vehicle speed on it?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 10:03 AM
  #81  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
whoever needs the pan send me an email at tscompusa@gmail.com I can get them for $580 shipped im almost positive. (AMS Moroso Pan)
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 10:09 AM
  #82  
metalsaber's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 2
From: The Sticks
Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance
It is a g force thing. If your forward acceleration exceeds .6g, then you can have this problem with the stock oil pan.

You can exceed .6g during acceleration whenever your trq gets pretty high, say anyhting over about 500ftlb trq can get you into this sort of acceleration realm. Additionally, being UNDER .6g accel and hitting a bump in the road has done the same thing in my logs.

Not turbo specific, but rather power specific related problem.
Thanks for the clarification. Since I have no real intentions of hitting a 500ftlb torque range, I should be safe.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 10:14 AM
  #83  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
oops my mistake. I read the graph wrong for sure. But even at three tenths of a second pressure dip I would question if its even an issue. I am certain my car has been at these high levels of g-force for quite some time. And I havent seen any kinda a bearing damage or turbo failure from it. Ans all the turbos on the car were fed from cylinder head. I just donnt see where a momentary dip to 50psi is a problem.

Dave if it were a problem I would think it very bad business of you to sell go fast parts full well knowing all the fast cars would suffer engine losses after buying your high priced parts. And you admittedly have no desire to sell a fix for it. very strange business indeed.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 11:19 AM
  #84  
Tex@FP's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Mckinney, Tx
The problem isn't just that the pressure dips, the pressure dips because the pickup is uncovered. Which means it sucks air.

Aerated oil @ 50-60psi ≠ non-aerated oil @ 50-60psi
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #85  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
The graphs is in minutes and seconds, the oil pressure on the log drops out at about 5.9 seconds and doesn't get stable again until about 7.6 seconds. In between it tries to recover and falls off again multiple times.

94awdcoupe, our parts aren't "high priced". I don't see the point in you turning this into a pissing contest. You read the log wrong twice. I am not interested in offering a pan because I've only seen damage I can connect to oil pressure on an EVO once or twice, I said I built a few pans custom at no charge. Check the fastest EVO's times and which engines are in most of those cars, NONE of them on the list have a modified oil pan in them and they stay together just fine. IF it were an issue that I felt the engines needed to have the pan to stay together I'd certainly be all over it. I am simply in this thread backing up what Robert said that there is problems with oil pressure under high g's.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #86  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
The graphs is in minutes and seconds, the oil pressure on the log drops out at about 5.9 seconds and doesn't get stable again until about 7.6 seconds. In between it tries to recover and falls off again multiple times.

94awdcoupe, our parts aren't "high priced". I don't see the point in you turning this into a pissing contest. You read the log wrong twice. I am not interested in offering a pan because I've only seen damage I can connect to oil pressure on an EVO once or twice, I said I built a few pans custom at no charge. Check the fastest EVO's times and which engines are in most of those cars, NONE of them on the list have a modified oil pan in them and they stay together just fine. IF it were an issue that I felt the engines needed to have the pan to stay together I'd certainly be all over it. I am simply in this thread backing up what Robert said that there is problems with oil pressure under high g's.
I agree 100%. Your prices are far from high. Look at AMS prices compared to Buschurs, and is there a difference AMS should charge that much extra for their engines over buschurs? No....... are they worth more? No.... Buschurs prices are good for the most important parts he offers which is why his business will keep doing better and better. If anyones prices SHOULD be higher its Buschurs.. he has way more engine build experience then anyone at AMS im sure. Look what he said above, he used to build sheps motors for christ sakes.....
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #87  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by Tex@FP
The problem isn't just that the pressure dips, the pressure dips because the pickup is uncovered. Which means it sucks air.

Aerated oil @ 50-60psi ≠ non-aerated oil @ 50-60psi
I get that it is aerated. But its 90 psi oil pressure that drops to 60psi because its aerated. Its still 60psi film strength. 60psi = 60 psi whether its oil, water, air , or gas.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #88  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
what about this? http://www.shop.kigglyracing.com/pro...8&categoryId=1
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 01:19 PM
  #89  
skochur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Morris County, NJ
^pm me about the ams oil pan...
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 02:44 PM
  #90  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by skochur
^pm me about the ams oil pan...
from info i gathered so far you dont need it unless you're doing autocross.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 PM.