We will see when the guy gets his build completed and back on the dyno.

 

No car has ever broken 500whp here on our dyno on 93 and 25psi except our TA car...

It simply doesn't happen, usually takes 30+psi on a big turbo and some fuel!

Id be more than happy to dyno it, if needed.

cb

 

Chad thier is something wrong with your Dyno! It breaks my heart everytime I get dynoed and tuned their! 5 times within the last year! I'm one heartbroken ****! Lmao! I'm takeing my car when it's finished to the op's magic pony Dyno and I'm gonna crush the t3 turbo horsepower record!!! Yeah boyee!

 

Simple.. 522 is so much nicer of a number the 422..

Make sure you do not include the CF on the sheet. Hate people to call you out

 

The key is you have to do it on pump to beat my record

and brents car made 722

cb

 

Dyno Number dont mean sh*t.. Go to the track n see what you trap... 522whp should be 126-130mph trap

 

if u dont even know who they are, then how did you know they were talking about DG?............. no big deal just a intersesting comment, im bored ha!

 

^^^hahaaha busted

 

I asked him in PM and mentioned it. OP just get virtual dyno and do a 3rd gear pull and post it up, or send me your 3rd gear log and we will put an end to this 522 @ 25psi talk.. I'm guessing you're around 415-420 on there. You're getting all this crap because of the thread name and we all know it cant be done unless you have an full blown setup to support it on 93.

Also the power isn't even that impressive, look at the graph, it doesn't hit 500 on the graph until 7k rpm, so its barely touching it.. so you're barely touching 400whp with a turbo that has the capability to flow 68lb/min. just give me a 3rd gear log from EvoScan and we can get you a more accurate read out, not an inflated dyno number.

 

What if hes going down hill? I can send you a log saying a stock evo has 600whp going down a 20% slope

 

and i can tell when its going down hill. airflow never lies (if its being logged) I guess I have to much trust in people. I dont think he will do it down hill tho. what gain does he have by doing that? he can say he has 600whp all he wants but if its only a 400whp car the laughs on him when he gets slaughtered by a real 600whp vehicle.

also i can put 2 + 2 together. if the timing doesnt add up with the fuel being used and afr isnt on, then i can pretty much call bs right away.

 

When supercharged z06's dyno less than a stock Z06 and a car that dynoed 522 on your dyno vdr's 650+ there is a problem. It is consistently low. When a stock evo puts down 80whp less than it is rated at from the factory you know it is messed up. There is not 30% drivetrain loss and mitsu didnt over rate the Evo. thats why i think your dyno is spitting out incorrect #'s.

 

apparently you dont understand how a load bearing dyno works... or how a dyno that uses a calculator works...

Please do some more research, we dont need to start a dyno battle thread again.

Our dyno is consistent in it's results.. along with GST... and other such shops that have an Eddy Current Load bearing dyno... that is capable of steady state, controlled ramp rates etc... not just WOT pulls

cb

 

My car didnt vdr 650 with that 522 dyno tune. I had to change a lot of things. FMIC, timing, afr, and a crucial setting in the ecu which was allowing timing to be pulled based on air temps. When I dynoed 522 there virtual dyno only showed 498~ DYNOJET. Believe it or not but IVEYTUNES dynojet at 1.0 CF reads extremely close to cbrd's mustang.

EDIT: My 522 numbers on the CBRD dyno were 541 on virtual dyno with dynojet settings not 498. The 655 was my own road tuning after replacing FMIC and modifying ECU to stop pull timing.

 

and our dyno reads virtually identical to BR and GST!

cb