Fp black. 522hp at 25psi.
I dont need to know how eddy current dynos work to know they work wrong. It is simple math. F=MA. If the numbers are wrong for whatever reason they are still wrong. You wont find ANY calculator anywhere that agrees with your dyno for trap speeds and weights with the power your dyno says a car makes.
Why do EVO8's only make 190whp on your dyno? Do you really think that they have 30+% drivetrain losses? I agree eddy current dynos are nicer for tuning and have lots of good features. I dont think they are good at comparing HP numbers because they can be manipulated.
Why do EVO8's only make 190whp on your dyno? Do you really think that they have 30+% drivetrain losses? I agree eddy current dynos are nicer for tuning and have lots of good features. I dont think they are good at comparing HP numbers because they can be manipulated.
apparently you dont understand how a load bearing dyno works... or how a dyno that uses a calculator works...
Please do some more research, we dont need to start a dyno battle thread again.
Our dyno is consistent in it's results.. along with GST... and other such shops that have an Eddy Current Load bearing dyno... that is capable of steady state, controlled ramp rates etc... not just WOT pulls
cb
Please do some more research, we dont need to start a dyno battle thread again.
Our dyno is consistent in it's results.. along with GST... and other such shops that have an Eddy Current Load bearing dyno... that is capable of steady state, controlled ramp rates etc... not just WOT pulls

cb
I dont need to know how eddy current dynos work to know they work wrong. It is simple math. F=MA. If the numbers are wrong for whatever reason they are still wrong. You wont find ANY calculator anywhere that agrees with your dyno for trap speeds and weights with the power your dyno says a car makes.
Why do EVO8's only make 190whp on your dyno? Do you really think that they have 30+% drivetrain losses? I agree eddy current dynos are nicer for tuning and have lots of good features. I dont think they are good at comparing HP numbers because they can be manipulated.
Why do EVO8's only make 190whp on your dyno? Do you really think that they have 30+% drivetrain losses? I agree eddy current dynos are nicer for tuning and have lots of good features. I dont think they are good at comparing HP numbers because they can be manipulated.
Why are you trying to compare Dyno's to Dyno's?
I dont need to know how eddy current dynos work to know they work wrong. It is simple math. F=MA. If the numbers are wrong for whatever reason they are still wrong. You wont find ANY calculator anywhere that agrees with your dyno for trap speeds and weights with the power your dyno says a car makes.
Why do EVO8's only make 190whp on your dyno? Do you really think that they have 30+% drivetrain losses? I agree eddy current dynos are nicer for tuning and have lots of good features. I dont think they are good at comparing HP numbers because they can be manipulated.
Why do EVO8's only make 190whp on your dyno? Do you really think that they have 30+% drivetrain losses? I agree eddy current dynos are nicer for tuning and have lots of good features. I dont think they are good at comparing HP numbers because they can be manipulated.
sorry!
I am not I am showing there are known quantities such as power to weight and that acceleration for X amount of power is easily figured out. I would like a dyno that is closer to real world HP numbers. Dynojets offer the most realistic and repeatable numbers that work with HP/ET calculators and engine dynos. So since they all work together and they work with the math that defines HP I would say that is the best #. You do realize that HP is DEFINED and not some voodoo magic number right?
I am not butt hurt at all. I would call out unrealistically high numbers just as quickly. I have never dynoed there and I never plan too. I know what my car weighs and I know what it runs at the track and I am perfectly happy with it.
Then why are you even posting about his Dyno? Are you venting? Did you walk in and see your girl getting the work done to here by someone who had higher Dyno numbers? I'm just asking?
I highlighted the part where he asked me to explain in case you missed it. I would like someone who likes super low reading dynos to tell me how a 271hp EVO8 "really" only makes 180-190whp? Do you guys think all the manufacturers are complicit in making false power claims or do you think there is 30+% drivetrain loss? Any answers guys? All I hear is "take it to the track" and "low numbers are more fun to dupe people into races". How about some concrete answers?
The point of this thread is a claimed power on pump gas and a single walbro fuel pump. If we cant establish wether the numbers we are arguing about are valid then there is nothing gained by discussing it.
Cheers!
I dont see the point of you trying to insult me. I never addressed you and by your respnses you werent worth it anyhow. The reason I am responding is because of this:
I highlighted the part where he asked me to explain in case you missed it. I would like someone who likes super low reading dynos to tell me how a 271hp EVO8 "really" only makes 180-190whp? Do you guys think all the manufacturers are complicit in making false power claims or do you think there is 30+% drivetrain loss? Any answers guys? All I hear is "take it to the track" and "low numbers are more fun to dupe people into races". How about some concrete answers?
The point of this thread is a claimed power on pump gas and a single walbro fuel pump. If we cant establish wether the numbers we are arguing about are valid then there is nothing gained by discussing it.
Cheers!
I highlighted the part where he asked me to explain in case you missed it. I would like someone who likes super low reading dynos to tell me how a 271hp EVO8 "really" only makes 180-190whp? Do you guys think all the manufacturers are complicit in making false power claims or do you think there is 30+% drivetrain loss? Any answers guys? All I hear is "take it to the track" and "low numbers are more fun to dupe people into races". How about some concrete answers?
The point of this thread is a claimed power on pump gas and a single walbro fuel pump. If we cant establish wether the numbers we are arguing about are valid then there is nothing gained by discussing it.
Cheers!
Hmmm. FPBlack comparison on our dyno-
I have done 490 at 29 on pump, but that was with a V5, S2s, built 2.0 motor, etc. We did 525@28psi on 92 octane with all the same mods on a built 2.4 as well. Knowing what it took to make 613@25psi on Mikey's E85 2.4 monster I really have to find it hard to believe this was legit on the operators end of the dyno session. What does a bone stock Evo, with the same correction factor your car used, make on this dyno?
aaron
I have done 490 at 29 on pump, but that was with a V5, S2s, built 2.0 motor, etc. We did 525@28psi on 92 octane with all the same mods on a built 2.4 as well. Knowing what it took to make 613@25psi on Mikey's E85 2.4 monster I really have to find it hard to believe this was legit on the operators end of the dyno session. What does a bone stock Evo, with the same correction factor your car used, make on this dyno?
aaron
We all know the Fp Black doesn't do jack @ 25psi !
Bob needs to clean up some stuff under the hood and put some real parts on..
Then we'll go for 35psi on pump.
It normally takes a double pumper and 1000cc injectors for that power range.
1200cc injectors and single pump won't even do it.
I haven't even gotten through the first page of this yet - i know there are a lot more questions and maybe people calling BS ( I would )
When the car is fixed up and retuned Bobby will post results, then visit another local dyno
1200cc injectors and single pump won't even do it.
I haven't even gotten through the first page of this yet - i know there are a lot more questions and maybe people calling BS ( I would )
When the car is fixed up and retuned Bobby will post results, then visit another local dyno
Last edited by ViscontiFlash; Oct 28, 2010 at 06:24 AM.


