Nice looking results!

 

Check my post time and his edit time. He edited it after I asked the question

 

your right i just looked at your post and was like did he really just ask that

 

The shop ct uses a 1.2 correction factor. When I was a customer of the shop ct. I was told that their dyno only reads 5-10hp higher, when compared to a uncorected dynojet, when dynoing the same car. But from what i've heard from other sources, is that the shop ct's dyno. Actually reads much higher than a uncorrected dynojet.

 

Who was the tuner of this car, sux the shop lost jr.

 

I have a hard time believing that The Shop CT had any problems with your car and then just let it go. Those guys over there are great guys that stand behind their work 100%. They put out quality work on a consistent basis. Including fixing the screw ups that other shops do. Trust me on that one. Jimmy is one of the most up front and honest guys i've worked with.

 

As i remember you wanted to run 40PSI+ on pump gas LOL.... Jimmy would never let any of his customers blow up there cars. You and i know what happened behind close doors remember something KARMA come's back to bite you in the A$$. BTW who built your evo???. are you also a TUNER now???.

No reason to bash the SHOP.

 

I will not respond to lies. And nonsense questions posted.

 

Not sure which tune your complaining about. The top graph may have a smidge more power, but holy crap is that a ****ty tune. You have either a nasty boost leak, a midget retard set the timing map, or your out of fuel/have alot of dialing in to do still. Look at the curves. One thing people need to learn is HP/TQ numbers means almost nothing. Well it does... But it all comes down to how smooth your graph is. Ive picked up less then 10 HP on some cars, but smoothed the hell out of them and picked up .400 in a 1/4 mile. And im not supporting or hating on either shop. Im just giving my opinion on the actual graphs. Bottom one made a little less power but id put money on it running faster in the quarter. Besides, turn SAE correction on the top graph and i bet the car only makes 560!! Unless they have some SUPER smoothing going on with that bottom graph. I own a dynojet and im only familiar with that software. Not much you can hide with a dynojet, wont let you smooth alot and it CANT lie. What kind of dyno software is the bottom graph?

 

the shop CT graph didnt start the pull until almost 4600rpm.. you cant compare that to a pull starting at 3k rpm.. either way it is alittle laggy i agree, but when comparing look at when the pulls actually started.

nice power for pump gas though, and i hope that shop compensates you to fix your mivec.. if not thats messed up.

 

LOL How's your evo BTW seen it at TOP LEVEL not to long ago. Was your mivec fixed???. Karma buddy. Jimmy always looked out for you and just a simple TUNER HP issue and you flip not cool .

Case closed.

 

Nice power for sure on straight pump

 

I was told the shop tune was unsafe by a few tuners that I talked too. So it dosent matter if you think the shop ct graph was going to make my car faster. Because I was not going to use the tune on my car set for 37 psi on pump gas on my daily driver. The bottom graph on the first page, is from the shop ct's dyno dynamics dyno with smoothing.

 

They had no intention of doing so. I was told by them that my mivec system was working. And because of it not working. I had horrible start up issues and my car stalling while driving around for months as a daily driver.